JCB logo
R&D Systems: New Poster Available
  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents

Published online 28 December 2004. doi:10.1083/jcb1681rr3
The Rockefeller University Press, 0021-9525 $8.00
JCB, Volume 168, Number 1, 11-11
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF, 403K)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Services
Right arrow Email this article
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new content in the JCB
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wells, W. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Wells, W. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Research Roundup

Exclusion is spreading


Allelic exclusion simplifies the problem of immune recognition. It ensures that each B cell makes antibodies that recognize only one target because, once the DNA of a single immunoglobulin allele has rearranged to form a functional gene, the other allele is prevented from rearranging. Now Esther Roldán, Jane Skok (University College London, UK), and colleagues find that allele exclusion may rely on putting different parts of the unrearranged gene too far from each other to allow rearrangement.

Rearrangement is only possible in such huge loci because of DNA contraction and (as shown here) looping that juxtaposes distant DNA sites. Skok and colleagues now show that successful rearrangement is immediately followed by decontraction of the unrearranged allele. Proximal variable (V) regions are still within reach of the rearrangement apparatus, but the products of these rearrangements are disfavored later because they pair poorly with immunoglobulin light chains and usually fail to induce positive selection of cells.

There is a backup mechanism for allele exclusion. Coincident with decontraction, the unrearranged allele is also recruited to repressive centromeric domains. But Skok says she thinks decontraction "is the most important factor. Decontraction seems to be irreversible and immediate, whereas recruitment is reversible." {rr_end}

Reference:

Roldán, E., et al. 2004. Nat. Immunol. doi:10.1038/ni1150.



William A. Wells

wellsw{at}rockefeller.edu


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF, 403K)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Services
Right arrow Email this article
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new content in the JCB
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wells, W. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Wells, W. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?


  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents