JCB logo
amgmicro.com
  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents

Published online 4 April 2005. doi:10.1083/jcb1691rr2
The Rockefeller University Press, 0021-9525 $8.00
JCB, Volume 169, Number 1, 16-16
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF, 687K)
Right arrow PPT slides of all figures
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Services
Right arrow Email this article
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new content in the JCB
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by LeBrasseur, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by LeBrasseur, N.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Research Roundup

Folding in a crowd



Crowding molecules (gray spheres) force a WW domain into compaction.

THIRUMALAI/NAS

Proteins fold better in a crowd, as predicted by a biophysical model from Margaret Cheung, Dmitri Klimov, and D. Thirumalai (University of Maryland, College Park, MD).

Interactions between a protein and large nearby molecules produce repulsive forces at distances that can be as large as the protein itself. The group modeled the energetic effects of these interactions on folding of a WW domain and found that it folds faster and has a more stable folded state in a crowded environment. The more spread out the protein, the more likely it is to experience unfavorable interactions with macromolecules. Compaction, in contrast, promotes its isolation.

Folding rates reach a maximum when 10% of the solution volume is taken up by other large molecules, but even at high densities the folding rates were still well above that in dilute solution. Approximately 40% of a bacterial cell is occupied by macromolecules. Thirumalai suggests that crowding effects may relieve some of the evolutionary pressure to produce rapidly folding sequences. "An optimal design may not be necessary," he says. "Maybe in fact moderately well-designed amino acid sequences are good enough."

The influence of crowding was also mimicked by folding proteins in a confined spherical space. These calculations were simpler than those done using crowding agents. Confinement may thus prove useful for future studies, including determining whether so-called natively unfolded proteins are actually at least partially structured in vivo. {rr_end}

Reference:

Cheung, M.S., et al. 2005. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 102:4753–4758.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



Nicole LeBrasseur

lebrasn{at}rockefeller.edu


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF, 687K)
Right arrow PPT slides of all figures
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Services
Right arrow Email this article
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new content in the JCB
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by LeBrasseur, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by LeBrasseur, N.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?


  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents