JCB logo
Accuri Cytometers
  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents

Published 9 May 2005. doi:10.1083/jcb1693iti4
The Rockefeller University Press, 0021-9525 $8.00
JCB, Volume 169, Number 3, 375-375
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF, 1058K)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Services
Right arrow Email this article
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new content in the JCB
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tuma, R. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Tuma, R. S.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

In This Issue

Evidence for AMPAR association


Characterization of AMPA receptors (AMPARs) purified from wild-type mice and from a mouse strain carrying an epitope-tagged version of the GluR2 subunit shows that AMPARs interact with only a subset of proteins previously thought to associate with the receptors, report Fukata et al. (page 399).

Changes in the number of AMPARs alter how well synapses conduct currents in the brain and are thought to control memory storage. A large number of proteins have been found to associate with AMPARs by in vitro assays, such as two-hybrid screens or coexpression in cell lines, but evidence for functional interaction is limited.

When Fukata et al. purified AMPAR components from brain extracts of transgenic mice expressing the epitope-tagged GluR2, only BiP, a common ER chaperone, and transmembrane AMPAR regulatory proteins (TARPs) came down in a quantitative manner. Because BiP and TARPs were in distinct AMPAR complexes, the researchers hypothesized that BiP–GluR2 may be an immature transitory complex.

Why didn't the other known AMPAR proteins come down? The authors think that only a few of the previously identified proteins associate with the majority of AMPARs in brain cells. The other proteins might interact with the receptors in a small subset of cells or under specific conditions. And the new work is consistent with emerging genetic data showing that, when these other proteins are removed, there are limited effects as compared with the phenotype of the stargazer mouse, a TARP mutant that lacks functional AMPARs in a common neural cell type in the brain. {iti_end}



Rabiya S. Tuma

rabiya{at}nasw.org


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?

Related Article

Molecular constituents of neuronal AMPA receptors
Yuko Fukata, Anastassios V. Tzingounis, Jonathan C. Trinidad, Masaki Fukata, Alma L. Burlingame, Roger A. Nicoll, and David S. Bredt
J. Cell Biol. 2005 169: 399-404. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF, 1058K)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Services
Right arrow Email this article
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new content in the JCB
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tuma, R. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Tuma, R. S.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?


  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents