JCB logo
amgmicro.com
  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents

Published online 2 May 2005. doi:10.1083/jcb1693rr3
The Rockefeller University Press, 0021-9525 $8.00
JCB, Volume 169, Number 3, 377-377
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF, 312K)
Right arrow PPT slides of all figures
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Services
Right arrow Email this article
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new content in the JCB
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by LeBrasseur, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by LeBrasseur, N.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Research Roundup

Separating receptor and ligand



EphA (green) and ephrinA (red) membrane localization does not overlap.

PFAFF/AAAS

Axonal pathfinding in motor neurons depends on surrounding guidance cues, including the membrane-bound ephrinA ligands, which repel growth cones that express EphA receptors. But many of those same growth cones also contain their own ephrinA. Now, Till Marquardt, Ryuichi Shirasaki, Samuel Pfaff, and colleagues (Salk Institute, La Jolla, CA) show how EphA ignores self-ephrinA during growth cone guidance.The authors find that ephrinA ligands that are on the same cell as a EphA receptor do not interfere with that receptor's ability to sense ligands on other cells. The interference is avoided by segregating receptor and ligand to different submembrane domains. EphrinA ligands, which are GPI-linked, colocalized with a lipid raft marker. EphA receptors, on the other hand, were found in nearby but distinct (presumably nonraft) domains. Forced mixing of the two, by expressing a transmembrane version of the ligand, made neurons blind to ephrinA ligands outside the cell.

When external EphA receptors bind to ephrinAs, the latter are also known to signal back into their own cell, but they elicit growth cone expansion rather than collapse. As with EphA receptors, this effect depended on the separation of EphA and ephrinA. Both EphrinA and EphA can thus act as guidance receptors on the same growth cone, with opposite results.

Decreased sensitivity to external ligand or receptors might be achieved naturally by regulated colocalization. The resulting desensitization might allow, for example, several axons that express both EphA and ephrinA to grow out as a bundle without repelling each other. {rr_end}

Reference:

Marquardt, T., et al. 2005. Cell. 121:127–139.[CrossRef][Medline]



Nicole LeBrasseur

lebrasn{at}rockefeller.edu


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF, 312K)
Right arrow PPT slides of all figures
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Services
Right arrow Email this article
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new content in the JCB
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by LeBrasseur, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by LeBrasseur, N.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?


  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents