JCB logo
amgmicro.com
  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents

Published online 31 October 2005. doi:10.1083/jcb1713rr5
The Rockefeller University Press, 0021-9525 $8.00
JCB, Volume 171, Number 3, 407-407
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF, 799K)
Right arrow PPT slides of all figures
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Services
Right arrow Email this article
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new content in the JCB
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wells, W. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Wells, W. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Research Roundup

Is it DNA or protein?



Binding to RPA is similar for both p53 (left) and ssDNA (right).

BOCHKAREV/NAS

Single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) and protein can mimic each other, according to Elena Bochkareva, Lilia Kaustov, Cheryl Arrowsmith, Alexey Bochkarev (University of Toronto, Canada), and colleagues. They find structural evidence that ssDNA and a helix from p53 both bind to replication protein A (RPA) in the same position and the same manner—with negative groups poking out and aromatic groups buried in a cleft.

The binding may allow p53 to titrate ssDNA during its response to DNA damage. Before damage, p53 is bound to RPA and thus prevented from acting as a transcriptional activator. When RPA first responds to the ssDNA exposed by DNA damage, it has additional domains that are better specialized for binding ssDNA, so p53 probably comes along for the ride. This exposes p53 to two signals about damage intensity: local kinases and ssDNA itself. The Canadian group shows that ssDNA can compete with p53 for binding to the same site on RPA. Released p53 should be free to activate transcription.

Yet more regulation comes from the phosphorylation of another subunit of RPA. This modified form of RPA is even better than ssDNA at displacing p53 from RPA, although the phosphorylation takes a while to accumulate. A combination of these regulators must somehow communicate the amount of DNA damage to p53 so it can help the cell to choose between apoptosis and the induction of DNA repair. {rr_end}

Reference:

Bochkareva, E., et al. 2005. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 102:15412–15417.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



William A. Wells

wellsw{at}rockefeller.edu


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF, 799K)
Right arrow PPT slides of all figures
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Services
Right arrow Email this article
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new content in the JCB
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wells, W. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Wells, W. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?


  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents