JCB logo
R&D Systems: New Poster Available
  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents

Published online 28 November 2005. doi:10.1083/jcb1715rr3
The Rockefeller University Press, 0021-9525 $8.00
JCB, Volume 171, Number 5, 757-757
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF, 633K)
Right arrow PPT slides of all figures
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Services
Right arrow Email this article
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new content in the JCB
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wells, W. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Wells, W. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Research Roundup

Squeezing dendritic necks



Over time (left to right), individual dendrites allow the escape of proteins (green) quickly (top), slowly (middle), or hardly at all (bottom).

SABATINI/NAS

Active dendritic spines isolate themselves from the outside world, say Brenda Bloodgood and Bernando Sabatini (Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA). The spine necks become a diffusion barrier, which may facilitate the localized build-up of changes needed for synaptic plasticity.

Bloodgood and Sabatini were "playing around" with a sensitive and photoactivatable fluorophore when they noticed that some dendritic spines seemed to be decoupled from the rest of the dendrite. Fluorophore activated inside these spines was slow to leak out, and fluorophore activated outside was slow to diffuse in. Large changes in this diffusion barrier occurred spontaneously in organotypic slice cultures, with more blockage being induced by drugs that favor excitatory transmission.

Sure enough, diffusion restriction was induced in individual dendrites by pairing two excitatory signals from pre-synaptic and post-synaptic sources.The clampdown at the dendrite neck may involve cross-linking of an actin mesh, or blockage by mitochondria or smooth endoplasmic reticulum. Either way, says Sabatini, "if a spine can hold onto [molecules such as] active kinases, this will have a big impact on signal integration." An isolated spine may be able to retain activated messengers until the next electrical spike arrives to boost the signal further. And truly isolated spines may also be able to act as independent electrical units that store or boost sub-spike electrical inputs. {rr_end}

Reference:

Bloodgood, B.L., and B.L. Sabatini. 2005. Science. 310:866–869.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



William A. Wells

wellsw{at}rockefeller.edu


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF, 633K)
Right arrow PPT slides of all figures
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Services
Right arrow Email this article
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new content in the JCB
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wells, W. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Wells, W. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?


  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents