JCB logo
R&D Systems: New Poster Available
  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents

Published online 28 November 2005. doi:10.1083/jcb1715rr4
The Rockefeller University Press, 0021-9525 $8.00
JCB, Volume 171, Number 5, 757-757
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF, 633K)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Services
Right arrow Email this article
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new content in the JCB
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wells, W. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Wells, W. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Research Roundup

Staying smart with age


S ome rats, and humans, are better than others at keeping their brains fresh and nimble with age. Hey-Kyoung Lee, Sun Seek Min, Michela Gallagher, and Alfredo Kirkwood (Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD) now find that old rats stay smart by switching from one way of modifying synapses to another.

Gallagher has noted before that a subset of older rats maintain learning abilities equivalent to those of young rats. Learning involves the modification of synaptic strength: connections are strengthened via long-term potentiation (LTP) and weakened via long-term depression (LTD). When thinking of learning, says Kirkwood, "most people put the emphasis on LTP, but I have an appreciation for what makes things weaker." When forming a new memory, "making [connections] stronger and making them weaker must be equally balanced."

LTD comes in two flavors, one dependent on and another independent of NMDA receptors (NMDARs). The Baltimore group found that NMDAR-LTD declined with age, but there was no difference between old rats that were either smart or befuddled. But the old and smart rats showed far more non–NMDAR-LTD than either the young rats or the old and befuddled rats.

Thus it appears that some aging rats successfully switch from NMDAR-LTD to non–NMDAR-LTD. This switch is a smart strategy, because NMDAR-LTD can cause excitotoxicity, so decoupling from NMDARs with age "could be a way of managing excitotoxicity," says Kirkwood. Once the non-NMDAR pathway is better characterized, it may make a better target than the NMDAR pathway for enhancing brain functioning in the elderly. {rr_end}

Reference:

Lee, H.-K., et al. 2005. Nat. Neurosci. doi:10.1038/nn1586.



William A. Wells

wellsw{at}rockefeller.edu


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF, 633K)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Services
Right arrow Email this article
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new content in the JCB
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wells, W. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Wells, W. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?


  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents