JCB logo
R&D Systems: New Poster Available
  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents

Published online 12 December 2005. doi:10.1083/jcb1716rr5
The Rockefeller University Press, 0021-9525 $8.00
JCB, Volume 171, Number 6, 915-915
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF, 355K)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Services
Right arrow Email this article
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new content in the JCB
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tuma, R. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Tuma, R. S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Research Roundup

History's influence on actin


An imposed load on an actin network leads to exuberant growth when the pressure is released, say Sapun Parekh, Ovijit Chaudhuri, Julie Theriot, and Daniel Fletcher (University of California, Berkeley, CA). Thus, history matters when it comes to actin growth dynamics.

Parekh et al. slowly increased the load pushing against a polymerizing actin network and measured network growth velocity along the way. Velocity remained constant for a while and then slowed as the load approached a stall-inducing maximum.

The authors then returned the system to a lighter load and found that the network grew much faster—even faster than it did previously at this lighter load. A sudden burst of polymerization like that might help a migrating cell push quickly through a weak spot in the surrounding tissue.

To explain how multiple velocities can exist for a given force, Fletcher suggests, "maybe the network is adapting to different loads." Force-mediated activation of Arp2/3, for instance, would increase branching. "With higher load," he explains, "you'd get a net addition in the number of filaments that are pushing the load. When the load is reduced, you now have many more filaments to push the smaller load." Still to be explained, however, is why the higher growth rate under the lightened load was long lasting, i.e., why Arp2/3 activity did not lessen and thereby reduce the number of filaments over time. {rr_end}

Reference:

Parekh, S.H., et al. 2005. Nat. Cell Biol. 7:1219–1223.



Rabiya S. Tuma

rabiya{at}nasw.org


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF, 355K)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Services
Right arrow Email this article
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new content in the JCB
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tuma, R. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Tuma, R. S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?


  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents