JCB logo
Accuri Cytometers
  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents

Published online 27 December 2005. doi:10.1083/jcb1721iti5
The Rockefeller University Press, 0021-9525 $8.00
JCB, Volume 172, Number 1, 3-3
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF, 340K)
Right arrow PPT slides of all figures
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Services
Right arrow Email this article
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new content in the JCB
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by LeBrasseur, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by LeBrasseur, N.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

In This Issue

Kar'ted to plus ends



Just two peaks of tubulin (white), at spindle pole bodies, reveal that no microtubule overlap is found during mating.

The depolymerization of linked microtubule plus ends draws chromosomes together in mating yeast cells, based on experiments from Molk et al. on page 27.

After two yeast cells fuse, their genomes come together via oppositely oriented microtubule sets whose plus ends face each other at the fusion site. The old model of this DNA congression suggested that the Kar3p microtubule minus end–directed motor pulled the plus end of one microtubule toward the minus end of its counterpart. Upon reaching the spindle pole body, Kar3p was thought to depolymerize the microtubule minus ends.

Recent findings put doubt on this 15-yr-old model. For one, minus end–directed motors generally accumulate on plus ends. Kar3p was indeed shown in vitro to depolymerize plus ends, where most microtubule dynamics is thought to occur.

Molk and colleagues now find that Kar3 does not track to the poles during congression. Instead, it remained at the interface between two microtubule sets, where it held together opposing plus ends (with the help of a plus-end binding protein called Bik1p). No microtubule overlap, which would indicate sliding, was seen.

The group proposes that Kar3p depolymerizes the plus ends while linking them, thus pulling the DNA to the center. The same mechanism might also apply to mammalian fertilization, in which the male pronucleus uses microtubules to migrate to the female genome. {iti_end}



Nicole LeBrasseur

lebrasn{at}rockefeller.edu


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?

Related Article

Nuclear congression is driven by cytoplasmic microtubule plus end interactions in S. cerevisiae
Jeffrey N. Molk, E.D. Salmon, and Kerry Bloom
J. Cell Biol. 2006 172: 27-39. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF, 340K)
Right arrow PPT slides of all figures
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Services
Right arrow Email this article
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new content in the JCB
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by LeBrasseur, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by LeBrasseur, N.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?


  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents