JCB logo
Quantitative Colocalization Analysis Software
  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents

Published online 27 December 2005. doi:10.1083/jcb1721rr4
The Rockefeller University Press, 0021-9525 $8.00
JCB, Volume 172, Number 1, 5-5
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF, 406K)
Right arrow PPT slides of all figures
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Services
Right arrow Email this article
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new content in the JCB
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wells, W. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Wells, W. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Research Roundup

Remodeling replication



Replication sites (green) are spaced closer after incubating nuclei in a mitotic egg extract (bottom).

MÉCHALI/ELSEVIER

Cloned nuclei are plucked from a comfortable, differentiated cell and thrust into an egg primed for embryonic development. For a frog nucleus, part of that switch is a conversion into embryonic DNA replication mode, say Jean-Marc Lemaitre, Marcel Méchali, and colleagues (CNRS, Montpellier, France). The absence of this switch may partially explain the woeful, 2–3% success rate of nuclear transfer cloning.Most researchers trying to improve cloning efficiency have concentrated on epigenetics—how to change modified chromatin proteins from a differentiated to an embryonic activity pattern.

But a frog's embryonic divisions differ from mature divisions in another sense: they take only 30 minutes each, in part because they use many more replication origins. In the new experiments, cloned nuclei replicated slowly and with fewer replication origins. Putting the nuclei first into a frog mitotic extract, however, boosted the number of origins and the speed and efficiency of replication in the subsequent cell cycle.

The switch was associated with closer spacing between origins, a randomization of attachment sites to the nuclear matrix, and shorter loops of DNA between nuclear matrix attachment sites. In each cycle the attachment sites were converted to a more dispersed, mature form during DNA replication, but were rerandomized during mitosis.

Many mammals lack rapid early cell divisions but, says Méchali, "origins may be fixed in different places in different cell types." For efficient cloning, "it may be important to fix them into a pattern appropriate for embryogenesis." {rr_end}

Reference:

Lemaitre, J.-M., et al. 2005. Cell. 123:787–801.[CrossRef][Medline]



William A. Wells

wellsw{at}rockefeller.edu


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF, 406K)
Right arrow PPT slides of all figures
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Services
Right arrow Email this article
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new content in the JCB
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wells, W. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Wells, W. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?


  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents