|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Article |
 Top Abstract IntroductionResultsDiscussionMaterials and methodsReferences |
|---|
S. Xu's present address is Dept. of Ophthalmology/Neurological Sciences, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL 60612.
Abbreviations used in this paper: aif, apoptosis-inducing factor; apaf1, apoptotic protease activating factor 1; BMP, bone morphogenic protein; cas9, caspase 9; cGMP, cyclic guanosine monophosphate; E, embryonic day; EB, embryoid body; ES, embryonic stem; ICM, inner cell mass; LIF, leukemia inhibitory factor; NAC, N-acetyl-L-cysteine; NFM, neurofilament-M; NSC, neural stem cell; NS, neurosphere; pCPT, 8-(4-chlorophenylthio).
 |
Introduction |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionResultsDiscussionMaterials and methodsReferences |
|---|
More recent data have challenged the validity of this classical model. Low-density cultures of dissociated ectodermal cells, in the absence of organizer tissue, were found to differentiate into neural cells (Grunz and Tacke, 1989; Sato and Sargent, 1989; Godsave and Slack, 1991). Furthermore, undissociated ectodermal explants expressing a dominant-negative receptor for activin (a member of the TGFß family of growth factors), which effectively inhibited signaling of multiple TGFß-related molecules (Schulte-Merker et al., 1994; Hemmati-Brivanlou and Thomsen, 1995), were shown to become neural when cultured in vitro (Hemmati-Brivanlou and Melton, 1994). Signaling molecules secreted from the organizer tissue, such as Noggin, Chordin, and Follistatin, were found to exert potent neuralizing effects (Lamb et al., 1993; Hemmati-Brivanlou et al., 1994; Sasai et al., 1995) and were thus initially thought to represent the instructive neuralizing signal. However, the mechanism by which they promoted neural differentiation of ectodermal cells was not entirely consistent with the existing positive induction model. The neuralizing effects of these factors were found to depend on inhibitory interactions with bone morphogenic proteins (BMPs), which are members of the TGFß family of molecules that strongly inhibit neural differentiation (Piccolo et al., 1996; Zimmerman et al., 1996; Fainsod et al., 1997). Thus, their mechanism of action appeared to be through prevention of BMP binding to their cognate receptors on ectodermal cells. These findings led to the development of the currently more widely accepted model, the default model, which states that each individual ectodermal cell has an intrinsic default program to become a neural cell (Munoz-Sanjuan and Brivanlou, 2002). In the context of the intact embryo, this default program is being actively suppressed by ubiquitously expressed BMPs. Thus, the organizer tissue does not provide a positive inductive signal but rather secretes factors that antagonize BMP signaling, thereby disinhibiting the default neural program in proximal ectodermal cells.
Several subsequent studies have challenged the default model of neural fate acquisition. For example, experiments in chicks have suggested that BMP inhibition may not be sufficient to induce neuralization (Streit et al., 2000; Linker and Stern, 2004). However, it is uncertain how complete the BMP inhibition was in these studies, and it is possible that the activity of individual BMPs was insufficiently suppressed to allow neuralization to occur (and/or that some BMP subtypes or other neural inhibitors escaped blockade). It has also been suggested that other factors, such as FGF and Wnt signaling, are involved with neural specification in several vertebrates (Baker et al., 1999; Streit et al., 2000; Wilson et al., 2000, 2001), though whether they are required for the initial neural fate change or for the later expansion of this neural population is currently unresolved. Further, their mechanism of action may be through modulation of BMP gene transcription (Bainter et al., 2001), consistent with a model of BMP inhibition–mediated neuralization.
There are currently few published studies examining the neural default model in mammalian cells, and there is controversy over whether such a default neural mechanism exists in mammals. In an effort to determine whether a default mechanism underlies neural fate specification from uncommitted mammalian precursors, we undertook studies using mouse embryonic stem (ES) cells, which are derived from the inner cell mass (ICM) of the blastocyst-stage embryo and represent a model of the earliest pluripotent mammalian cell (Evans and Kaufman, 1981; Martin, 1981). ES cells are capable of generating entire viable mice in vivo (Nagy et al., 1993) and are able to produce most, if not all, cell types in vitro (Beddington and Robertson, 1989; Rathjen and Rathjen, 2001; Wobus, 2001). Use of ES cells to investigate neural determination can potentially provide many insights into the developmental process. Importantly, though, their use in assessing a default fate specification mechanism allows us to explore a more basic and fundamental issue, i.e., how an uncommitted, pluripotent mammalian cell will self-organize in the absence of extrinsic instructive or inhibitory signals and what cellular configuration/fate will result.
The standard methodology for the in vitro differentiation of ES cells typically involves the formation of embryoid bodies (EBs; Desbaillets et al., 2000), which are formed by aggregation of ES cells in the presence of serum and in the absence of leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF), a cytokine necessary for maintaining ES cells in an undifferentiated state. EBs contain many different cell types that are fated to produce cells of all three primary germ layers. Because there is complex intercellular signaling between the multiple cell types of an EB and they are generated in the presence of serum with its host of undefined factors, EB formation precludes a direct analysis of the mechanisms regulating the differentiation of a specific cell lineage. To assess a default state, we wanted to isolate single ES cells and minimize any exposure to extrinsic factors that might be either instructive or inhibitory to cell fate specification. Therefore, we used a system of chemically defined serum- and feeder layer–free culture conditions coupled with low cell densities (to abrogate intercellular signaling). In a previous study, we reported that these conditions appeared to favor neural determination of ES cells (Tropepe et al., 2001). Further, a novel colony-forming primitive NSC population arose under these conditions, one with characteristics intermediate to those of ES cells and forebrain-derived "definitive" NSCs. Here, we demonstrate default neural fate acquisition by ES cells, a process shown to be independent of potential instructive factors. FGFs were found to be important for the proliferation but not the generation of the default pathway–derived primitive NSCs. Further, we provide evidence that the default neural fate pathway specifically gives rise to primitive NSCs and that primitive NSC mortality resulting from a survival challenge, which could be mitigated by survival factors or genetic interference with apoptosis, was responsible for limiting the persistence and proliferation of these cells.
|
Results |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionResultsDiscussionMaterials and methodsReferences |
|---|
10 cells/µl; 2,600 cells/cm2) in chemically defined serum- and growth factor–free media. As we reported previously (Tropepe et al., 2001), ES cells placed in these minimal conditions rapidly acquired a neural identity, with >90% of cells initiating expression of nestin, an intermediate filament protein associated with neural precursors (Lendahl et al., 1990), within 4 h (Fig. 1 A). The neural precursor identity of these cells was supported further by their expression of Sox1, one of the earliest transcription factors expressed in cells committed to the neural fate (Pevny et al., 1998; Fig. 1 C). Undifferentiated ES cell colonies did not exhibit expression of these markers (Fig. 1, B and D). At 4 h, no significant cell mortality was observed and <1% of the plated cells had proliferated, indicating that single ES cells began a direct transition to neural cells, without requirement for cell division. After an additional 20 h, most (77.5 ± 1.3%) of these ES-derived neural cells did not survive, as these minimal conditions were not very supportive. However, 99.3 ± 0.2% of the remaining viable cells expressed nestin and Sox1 and maintained some expression of Oct4, a transcription factor expressed in ES cells (Nichols et al., 1998; Fig. 1, E and F). To verify that the observed up-regulation of nestin was not a nonspecific stress response, STO fibroblasts were placed in identical conditions; however, RT-PCR and immunostaining did not show any nestin expression either before or after culture in minimal media (unpublished data).
|
ES cell neuralization occurs by default without requirement for any exogenous instructive factors
Is this neural transition truly occurring by default? A protein component of the media formulation, transferrin, has been suggested to be required for ES cell neural fate initiation (Ying et al., 2003). We show that nestin and Sox1 expression was established after 4 h, even when ES cells were cultured in PBS alone, ruling out any requirement for media components in an instructive capacity (Fig. 2, A and B). After a 24-h culture period in PBS, very few cells remained viable, though they all expressed nestin and Sox1 (Fig. 2, C and D). The fragmented nuclei represent dead cells, which typically did not display immunoreactivity for the neural markers.
|
Primitive NSCs emerge from the default neural pathway
What is the nature of the neural cells emerging from this default pathway? The early expression of nestin and Sox1 indicates that they are neural precursors. However, these markers are expressed both in true NSCs as well as in more restricted neural progenitor cells. Our previous work introduced a novel neural precursor arising under these conditions, the primitive NSC (Tropepe et al., 2001), identified with an assay analogous to the neurosphere (NS)-formation assay used to identify definitive forebrain-derived NSCs. When the cytokine LIF was included in our minimal condition assay, a very small percentage (0.18 ± 0.01%) of the initially plated ES cells became neural cells that proliferated over 7 d to form clonally derived floating sphere colonies, termed primitive NSs (Fig. 3 A). LIF was not required for early ES cell neuralization, as it could be added after 4 h without any decrement in primitive NS production (101 ± 4% of control). Rather, LIF appeared to prevent further differentiation down the neural lineage and thereby maintained these neural cells in an undifferentiated, proliferative state. This interpretation is supported by the findings that LIF addition after 2 d did not enable any primitive NS generation (unpublished data), indicating that there was an LIF-responsive temporal window, after which the neural cells had progressed to a non–LIF-responsive, unproliferative, and more differentiated state. These primitive NSs expressed both nestin and Sox1 (Fig. 3, B and C), similar to NSs generated by definitive NSCs, indicating that they are composed of neural precursors. The primitive NS cells also maintained some expression of Oct4 (by immunostaining and RT-PCR), as well as nanog (by RT-PCR), another transcription factor expressed by ES cells (Chambers et al., 2003; unpublished data). The neural precursor character of the primitive NSs was confirmed by expanded RT-PCR gene expression analysis. Various additional neural genes were expressed by primitive NSs, including Sox2, Sox3, Neurogenin1, NeuroD, Pax6, Nkx2.2, Mash1, Musashi-1, Otx2, and HoxB1, strongly supporting their neural nature (Fig. S1, available at http://www.jcb.org/cgi/content/full/jcb.200508085/DC1). Primitive NSs did not express CK-17 (an epidermal marker), nor did they express the mesodermal markers brachyury and GATA-1 or the endodermal markers HNF3ß, HNF4, and Pax4. These multi–germ layer markers are typically found in EBs (Wassarman and Keller, 2003), and their absence further verifies that the primitive NS cells are specified to the neural lineage. Transcripts for most of these genes were found at detectable levels in undifferentiated ES cells, suggesting that there may be widespread, low-level, promiscuous gene expression in the uncommitted state and that differentiation may involve the down-regulation of certain genetic programs with the maintenance and up-regulation of others. The primitive NS cells could be maintained in an undifferentiated state by subcloning/passaging in serum-free conditions to produce secondary, tertiary, and successive spheres. Interestingly, secondary and subsequent sphere formation was dependent on the addition of exogenous FGF2, similar to the FGF2-dependent proliferation of forebrain-derived NSCs. When transferred to conditions promoting differentiation, individual primitive NSs differentiated to produce neurons, astrocytes, and oligodendrocytes (Fig. 3 D), the three neural lineage cell types. Cells negative for differentiation markers maintained a neural precursor identity, expressing nestin and Sox1 (Fig. 3 E). Differentiation of the passaged spheres was similar to that of the primary primitive NSs (unpublished data). Though the cells present after in vitro differentiation of primitive NSs appeared limited to differentiated and immature/precursor neural cells, the maintained expression of some ES-like genes (Oct4 and nanog) in the undifferentiated primitive NS state suggested that cells constituting the primitive NS were not yet absolutely committed to the neural lineage. This is supported by our previous finding that primary primitive NSs could still manifest broader lineage potential when placed in the appropriate developmental environment, i.e., when used to generate morula-aggregation embryo chimeras (Tropepe et al., 2001). However, when the primitive NSs were passaged to produce secondary spheres (with FGF2 and without LIF), efficient chimera production was not observed (similar to our results obtained using NSs from forebrain-derived adult NSCs), suggesting that the secondary spheres were now fated exclusively to the neural lineage (Tropepe et al., 2001; unpublished data). Further, expression of Oct4 and nanog was not found by RT-PCR in the secondary spheres (unpublished data). Thus, a novel neural precursor, the primitive NSC, arose in these default conditions.
|
|
0.2%) that proliferate to form primitive NSs (which is our assay for the presence of a primitive NSC), the question remains as to whether the default fate pathway specifically gives rise to primitive NSCs or simply to a population of generalized and perhaps heterogeneous cells of the neural lineage. Though neural in nature, it is possible that this ES-derived population contains a very small subset of bona fide primitive NSCs, capable of long-term passaging and production of multilineage progeny, whereas the remainder may represent more restricted or committed neural cells. If the default pathway does specifically give rise to primitive NSCs, there must be some inhibitory influences preventing the exhibition of the primitive NSC phenotype, i.e., primitive NS generation, in all of the individual neural derivatives of ES cells.
The early nestin+ neural cells present after 4 h in minimal conditions subsequently underwent a survival challenge because of the exiguous nature of the media, resulting in extensive cell mortality (77.5 ± 1.3% by 24 h). In the absence of LIF, mortality progressively increased over 7 d, until no viable cells remained. In the presence of LIF, a few of the neural cells retained a proliferative character, surviving and propagating to form primitive NSs, though the vast majority of the early nestin+ cells still died. Accordingly, primitive NSCs may have been produced but did not form primitive NSs because of the early survival challenge that they experienced. Thus, increasing cell viability should enhance primitive NS production. The survival factor N-acetyl-L-cysteine (NAC), which has multiple modes of action but is thought to act primarily through its antioxidant effects (Zafarullah et al., 2003), promotes survival of various neural cell types (Mayer and Noble, 1994; Ferrari et al., 1995; Yan et al., 1995). Inclusion of NAC dose-dependently increased primitive NS formation (up to 35-fold), with toxic effects observed at very high concentrations (Fig. 5 A). We also explored the cAMP–protein kinase A pathway as a more physiological modulator of cell survival. cAMP signaling has been shown to enhance cell survival in several different neural cell systems (Rolletschek et al., 2001; Bok et al., 2003; Lara et al., 2003). Exogenous application of a membrane-permeable cAMP analogue, 8-(4-chlorophenylthio) (pCPT)-cAMP, was able to dose-dependently augment primitive NS formation (up to 25-fold), with toxic effects observed at exceedingly supraphysiological concentrations (Fig. 5 A). Concentrations at which peak effects were observed were used in all subsequent experiments (1 mM NAC and 100 µM pCPT-cAMP). When added simultaneously, the effects of NAC and pCPT-cAMP were additive, if not synergistic, enhancing primitive NS formation (up to 100-fold) such that 20% of the initially plated ES cells became primitive NS–forming primitive NSCs (Fig. 5 B). This also suggests that the two compounds have distinct mechanisms of primitive NSC survival promotion (leading to subsequent primitive NS formation). RT-PCR analysis of primitive NSs derived in each or both factors demonstrated the expression of the neural precursor markers without detection of the multi–germ layer markers (discussed previously). Addition of NAC and/or pCPT-cAMP after 4 h of the primitive NS assay (at which point the cells have already undertaken their neural transition) revealed no decrement in their ability to augment primitive NS formation (NAC addition at 4 h was 98 ± 3% of NAC added from start, and pCPT-cAMP addition at 4 h was 101 ± 3% of pCPT-cAMP added from start), suggesting that they were not effecting the NS increase through an instructive role in early differentiation. Additionally, this demonstrated that the survival-promoting effects of NAC and cAMP were not directly on ES cells but rather on their nestin+ clonal neural derivatives.
|
The ability of NAC and pCPT-cAMP to facilitate primitive NS formation decreased dramatically and progressively when the compounds were added during the derivation of secondary and tertiary spheres (Fig. 5 C). This suggests that the extensive survival challenge that limited primitive NS generation occurred only with the primary ES–derived primitive NSCs and not with the subsequently passaged NSCs, which are similar to forebrain-derived definitive NSCs (which also did not exhibit increases in NS formation with the survival factors; unpublished data). This effect highlights a fundamental difference between primitive NSCs and the passaged, more mature definitive NSCs. When individual primary spheres derived in the presence of pCPT-cAMP were passaged back into control media for secondary sphere formation, they generated 2.3 ± 0.2 times (P < 0.01) more secondary spheres compared with primary spheres that had been derived in control media. Spheres derived in NAC did not display any increased secondary sphere formation when passaged back into control media. This suggests that pCPT-cAMP may have had an additional effect, increasing the number of symmetric divisions that the primitive NSC underwent, thereby expanding the stem cell numbers within the primary sphere. Alternately, there may have simply been a prolonged survival enhancement in the pCPT-cAMP–derived primary sphere cells, even when they were placed back into media without pCPT-cAMP. Primitive NSs derived in NAC and/or pCPT-cAMP did not display any notable alterations in differentiation (unpublished data). Pharmacological modulation of the endogenous pathways showed that the cAMP pathway positively regulated and the cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP) pathway negatively regulated primitive NSC survival and primitive NS formation (see online supplemental material).
Genetic deletion of apoptotic pathway components enhances primitive NS formation
To further substantiate that cell mortality limited the number of primitive NSCs that survived to proliferate and form clonal primitive NSs, we used ES cell lines with a survival advantage conferred by mutations in apoptotic signaling pathway components. Apoptotic protease activating factor 1 (apaf1) and caspase 9 (cas9) are components of the more common apoptotic pathway (Cai et al., 1998), whereas apoptosis-inducing factor (aif) is a mediator of an alternate, independent apoptotic pathway (Cande et al., 2002). The apaf1–/– (Yoshida et al., 1998), cas9–/– (Hakem et al., 1998), and aif–/Y (Joza et al., 2001) ES cells displayed substantially increased primitive NS formation relative to wild-type ES cells, with a more pronounced effect observed for the apaf1 and cas9 mutants (Fig. 6 A). Heterozygotes for apaf1 and cas9 displayed an intermediate effect, indicative of a gene dosage effect (Fig. 6 A). Differentiation of primitive NSs generated by these ES cell lines was similar to wild type (unpublished data). This demonstrates that, similar to the effect of survival factors, survival promotion through interference with apoptosis enhanced primitive NS formation. This also suggested that the primary apoptotic pathway responsible for mediating cell death in these cultures was the apaf1–cas9 apoptotic pathway, although there was still some contribution from the aif pathway.
|
TGFß inhibition independently cooperates with the survival factors to promote primitive NS production
We have previously demonstrated that TGFß-related signaling negatively regulates ES cell neuralization and the basal number of primitive NSs that form in our assay (Tropepe et al., 2001). To determine how survival promotion interacted with interference of the TGFß pathway, the effects of NAC and pCPT-cAMP were assessed in an ES cell line that contains a mutation in smad4, a key downstream signaling molecule in multiple TGFß-related pathways (Sirard et al., 1998). The smad4–/– ES cells displayed increased primitive NS generation relative to wild-type ES cells under both control media conditions as well as in the presence of the survival factors such that in the presence of both NAC and pCPT-cAMP 35% of the initially plated ES cells became primitive NSCs that were able to survive and proliferate to form primitive NSs (Fig. 6 C). These results provide further support for the notion that the default pathway does indeed give rise specifically to primitive NSCs (though TGFß signaling hinders this default to primitive NSCs), which then experience a separate survival challenge limiting the number of primitive NSCs that form primitive NSs.
|
Discussion |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionResultsDiscussionMaterials and methodsReferences |
|---|
Studies using human ES cells have supported the concept of default neural differentiation (Schulz et al., 2004; Vallier et al., 2004), although clonal analyses were not performed. Other work examining the neural conversion of mouse ES cells without EB formation reported that most cells adopted a neural precursor phenotype in serum-free conditions; however, they found that widespread neuralization did not occur until at least 3 d (Ying et al., 2003). Further, Ying et al. (2003) suggest that the media component transferrin and autocrine FGFs were required positive instructive factors, in contrast to a pure default model. The present results demonstrate that neural specification commences over a matter of hours, even when ES cells were placed in PBS alone, ruling out any necessity for media components in an instructive capacity. Certainly, cells cannot be maintained long-term in PBS alone, as nutritive factors are required in a permissive role. Further, we provide evidence against any positive inductive role for autogenously produced FGFs by demonstrating that neither pharmacological FGF inhibition (using the same inhibitor as Ying et al., 2003) nor genetic deletion of the FGF receptor-1 effected any reduction in neuralization. Rather, such FGF signaling functions to allow the proliferation of the default pathway–derived neural precursors. Experiments of Ying et al. (2003) used cell densities up to 20 times higher than those used in the present studies and in some cases allowed low-density plated ES cells to grow as colonies overnight in normal ES media (increasing the effective cell density) before removal of LIF and serum. These conditions are likely to facilitate the density-dependent accumulation and signaling of secreted neural inhibitors (e.g., BMPs), as we demonstrated previously (Tropepe et al., 2001), potentially explaining why their neuralization was delayed. They also reported the gradual increase in expression of BMP antagonists (e.g., noggin and follistatin) over 1–5 d in their conditions, which would then provide the BMP antagonism necessary to allow the default program to manifest. Furthermore, the extensive viability and exponential cell expansion in their conditions is in stark contrast to our findings, indicating that their high cell densities and/or richer media formulation produced an environment less minimal than that used in the current study.
The severely minimal nature of our culture conditions was necessary to effectively minimize potential extrinsic influences and thereby assess a default state. However, this was clearly responsible for the extensive cell mortality observed. In attempts to evaluate the default state, one encounters a catch-22. At some point, progressive removal of extrinsic factors will dispense with constituents essential for default fated cell survival, and there will be no experimental output to assess. Such factors are required for neuralization not in an instructive capacity but rather in a permissive, supportive one. In interpretation of our results, one might suggest that we were merely providing conditions that selected for the survival of neural cells while nonneural cells perished, and thus the default state was not assessed. Two observations argue against this interpretation. First, in the initial 4 h after ES cell plating, no significant mortality was observed, yet the vast majority of individual ES cells had already begun their neural transition. Second, with the use of both survival factors in the 24-h assay, viability was increased from 23 to 65%; however, a multiple marker–based analysis showed that there was no difference in the uniform cell neuralization and that there was no expression of other germ layer markers. If the conditions used were selecting against the survival of nonneural lineage cells, they should have been apparent when survival was so dramatically increased.
The primitive NSCs described here exhibited characteristics (i.e., proliferative sphere formation, gene expression, and differentiation potential) that are analogous to forebrain-derived NSCs. Although it is clear that the primitive NSCs commenced neural lineage specification, it was apparent that they retained vestiges of ES cell features, suggesting that the commitment was not yet absolute. This was evidenced by the broader differentiation potential observed in blastocyst chimera experiments (Tropepe et al., 2001). Passaging of the primitive NSs yielded more committed neural precursors, increasingly similar to NSs formed by forebrain-derived NSCs (e.g., they acquired dependence on exogenous FGF2, ceased expression of ES cell markers Oct4 and nanog, and lost blastocyst chimerism potential). Recent work from our lab has demonstrated that LIF-dependent sphere-forming cells can be isolated directly from the embryonic day (E) 5.5–7.5 mouse epiblast (Hitoshi et al., 2004). These embryo-derived spheres possessed similar characteristics to the ES-derived primitive NSs and were found to give rise to FGF2-dependent, NS-forming, definitive NSCs upon passaging in vitro (Hitoshi et al., 2004). Thus, in vivo there are two distinct sphere-forming NSC populations that are present at different stages of development from E5.5 to adult. In addition, corresponding sphere-forming NSC populations could be sequentially derived from ES cells. This suggests the in vivo relevance of an ES cell–based model describing the ontogeny of NSCs (Fig. 7). Pluripotent ES cells derived from the E3.5 ICM will commence a direct default transition in the absence of inhibitory influences (e.g., TGFß-related signaling) to yield LIF-dependent primitive NSCs, similar to those that can be isolated from the epiblast (Hitoshi et al., 2004). The primitive NSs produced can be passaged to give rise to definitive, FGF2-dependent NSCs, analogous to the FGF2-dependent NSCs that can be isolated from the E8.5 neural plate (Tropepe et al., 1999). The in vitro–derived definitive NSCs can be extensively passaged to demonstrate long-term self-renewal, consistent with the effective isolation of definitive NSCs from the adult remnant of the embryonic brain germinal zone throughout the lifetime of the animal.
|
In addition to providing insights into the mechanisms of neural development, default fate studies using ES cells allow exploration of what is perhaps a more basic and fundamental issue, i.e., how an uncommitted, pluripotent mammalian cell will self-organize in the absence of extrinsic instructive or inhibitory signals and what cellular configuration/fate will result. Our data suggest that such uncommitted cells tend to self-organize in the configuration of a NSC, i.e., the default fate. What is meant by the term default? Clearly, such analyses begin with the definition of a system, and the default state represents the configuration that the system will autonomously acquire in the absence of extrinsic inputs to the system. However, this means that there can be different levels of analysis depending on the definition of the initial system. In the context of ES cell default neural fate, a fairly gross level of analysis would simply state that no other tissues or cells are required for an ES cell to become a neural cell, whereas all other factors (such as environmental/media components and endogenous/autocrine signaling) are included within the system. The present data would clearly satisfy this level of analysis. A finer level of analysis would state that a single ES cell would acquire a neural identity with only permissive molecules present (in the media) and without autocrine inductive signals. The present data seem to partially satisfy this level of analysis as well, as we have ruled out requirement for exogenously supplied instructive molecules and autogenous FGF signaling. However, we cannot yet definitively demonstrate that no other potential instructive endogenously supplied (and perhaps autocrinely acting) factors are present. An even finer level of analysis would be at the genomic level, with the system defined as the entire genome. Though comprehensive and definitive analysis of the genomic system in isolation is currently impossible (as the genome only exists in an active form in the context of living cells), a default neural state at this level would predict that the highest genes within the neural genetic program (i.e., a potential "master neural genes") would have only repressor elements within its regulatory regions. In this model, signals extrinsic to the genome would not be necessary to activate the neural genetic program; rather, they could serve only to inhibit it. Transcriptional repressors have been identified that are responsible for inhibition of the neural program, e.g., neuron-restrictive silencing factor/RE1-silencing transcription factor (NSRF/REST; Chen et al., 1998). In vivo inhibition of NSRF/REST leads to derepression of neural genes in both neural and nonneural tissues (Chen et al., 1998). Thus, it is possible that NSRF/REST, as well as other transcriptional repressors, is required to prevent the default neural genetic program from being activated in all cells.
|
Materials and methods |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionResultsDiscussionMaterials and methodsReferences |
|---|
Animals and NSC culture
NSCs were isolated from the forebrain ventricular subependyma of adult CD1 mice (Charles River Laboratories) and cultured/maintained using the NS assay as previously described (Seaberg and van der Kooy, 2002).
ES cell minimal condition assays
ES cells were dissociated into a single-cell suspension and plated at 10 cells/µL on laminin/polyornithine–coated culture plates (Nunclon) in chemically defined, serum-free media (Tropepe et al., 1999, 2001), which consisted of DME/F-12 (1:1; Invitrogen) with 0.6% D-glucose, 5 mM Hepes, 3 mM NaHCO3, 2 mM glutamine, 25 µg/ml insulin, 100 µg/ml transferrin, 20 nM progesterone, 60 µM putrescine, and 30 nM sodium selenite. PBS used for cell incubation in the short-term neural conversion experiments included 20 mM glucose. Uncoated dishes were also tested, and though cells exhibited greatly decreased adhesion, no differences in the neural conversion assays were observed. Cells were fixed for immunocytochemical analysis or cells were collected for RT-PCR analysis at various time points over the course of a 7-d culture period. For assessment of the survival of the 4-h nestin+ cells, ES cells were initially plated at 50 cells/well (48-well plate). At various time points thereafter, trypan blue exclusion was used to determine the number of viable cells or cell colonies (each representing the survival of a single 4-h nestin+ cell). Survival factors (Sigma-Aldrich) were included as indicated in the text.
Primitive NS assays
A single-cell suspension of ES cells was plated at 10 cell/µL in uncoated 24-well culture plates (Nunclon) in serum-free media (as described in the previous section) containing LIF (1,000 U/ml). Over a 7-d culture period, clonal, floating sphere colonies (>75-µm diam) of neural precursors formed (primitive NSs; see online supplemental material for more details). For passaging, spheres were individually or bulk dissociated into single cells by trypsin/EDTA (Invitrogen) incubation followed by manual trituration. Cells were then replated in the same media with inclusion of 10 ng/ml FGF2 (Sigma-Aldrich) and 2 µg/ml heparin (Sigma-Aldrich) and allowed to form subsequent spheres for 7 d. Survival factors and other pharmacological agents were from Sigma-Aldrich, except SU5402 (Calbiochem), and were included as described in the text. For differentiation, individual spheres were removed from growth factor–containing media and transferred to Matrigel-coated plates in the same media formulation as noted previously (without growth factors) supplemented with 1% FCS and cultured for 7 d. Undifferentiated and differentiated NSs were fixed for immunocytochemical analysis or were collected for RT-PCR analysis.
Immunocytochemistry
Fixation and immunocytochemical analysis of cells was performed as described previously for NSs (Seaberg and van der Kooy, 2002). Primary antibodies used included anti-nestin rabbit polyclonal (1:2,000; a gift from R. McKay, National Institutes of Health Research, Bethesda, MD), anti-nestin rabbit polyclonal (1:50, a gift from R. Goldman, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL), anti-nestin mouse monoclonal (1:1,000; Chemicon), anti-Oct4 mouse monoclonal (1:500; BD Biosciences), anti-Sox1 rabbit polyclonal (1:150; Chemicon), anti-NFM rabbit polyclonal (1:200; Chemicon), anti-tubulin isotype III (ß3-tubulin) mouse monoclonal (IgG; 1:500; Sigma-Aldrich), anti-glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) mouse monoclonal (IgG; 1:400; Sigma-Aldrich), and anti-O4 mouse monoclonal (IgM; 1:100; Chemicon). Nestin immunoreactivity in the short-term (1–3 d) assays and in primitive NSs was verified by immunostaining with at least two nestin antibodies. Secondary antibody–only wells were processed simultaneously using the identical protocol, except that solutions did not contain primary antibodies. All secondary-only controls were negative for staining. Cell nuclei were counterstained with the nuclear dye DAPI or Hoechst 33258. Fluorescent images were visualized using a motorized inverted research microscope (IX81; Olympus) with 20x/0.40 and 40x/0.60 objectives at room temperature and captured using Olympus MicroSuite Version 3.2 image analysis software (Soft Imaging System Corp.). Images were prepared using Photoshop 6.0 (Adobe) software.
RT-PCR
Total RNA was extracted from cells using an RNeasy extraction kit (QIAGEN) with inclusion of DNase to prevent genomic DNA contamination. RT-PCR was performed using a OneStep RT-PCR kit (QIAGEN) in a GeneAmp PCR System 9700 (Applied Biosystems) according to kit instructions. See Table S3 (available at http://www.jcb.org/cgi/content/full/jcb.200508085/DC1) for details of primer sequences and cycling conditions.
Statistics
Data are expressed as means ± SEM unless specified otherwise. Statistical comparisons between two groups were performed using a t test where appropriate or by one-way analysis of variance with Dunnett's posttest for comparing groups to control or the Bonferroni posttest for comparisons between groups where an acceptable level of significance was considered at P < 0.05.
Online supplemental material
Fig. S1 shows expanded RT-PCR analysis of primitive NSs, confirming their neural precursor nature. Fig. S2 shows that cAMP pathway activity promotes primitive neurosphere production, whereas cGMP pathway activity impairs it. Table S1 shows actual raw sphere counts obtained in one experiment, and Table S2 shows normalized sphere counts. Table S3 shows gene primer sequences and expected product sizes for RT-PCR. The Results section describes studies in which the cAMP and cGMP pathways were modulated. These studies showed that the cAMP pathway positively regulated and the cGMP pathway negatively regulated primitive NSC survival and primitive NS formation. The Materials and methods section contains additional details regarding the primitive NS assay and the counting and normalization of data. Online supplemental material is available at http://www.jcb.org/cgi/content/full/jcb.200508085/DC1.
|
Acknowledgments |
|---|
This work was supported by the Canadian Stem Cell Network and the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (grant 7950).
Submitted: 11 August 2005
Accepted: 28 November 2005
|
References |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionResultsDiscussionMaterials and methodsReferences |
|---|
Bainter, J.J., A. Boos, and K.L. Kroll. 2001. Neural induction takes a transcriptional twist. Dev. Dyn. 222:315–327.[CrossRef][Medline]
Baker, J.C., R.S. Beddington, and R.M. Harland. 1999. Wnt signaling in Xenopus embryos inhibits bmp4 expression and activates neural development. Genes Dev. 13:3149–3159.
Beddington, R.S., and E.J. Robertson. 1989. An assessment of the developmental potential of embryonic stem cells in the midgestation mouse embryo. Development. 105:733–737.
Bok, J., X.M. Zha, Y.S. Cho, and S.H. Green. 2003. An extranuclear locus of cAMP-dependent protein kinase action is necessary and sufficient for promotion of spiral ganglion neuronal survival by cAMP. J. Neurosci. 23:777–787.
Cai, J., J. Yang, and D.P. Jones. 1998. Mitochondrial control of apoptosis: the role of cytochrome c. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1366:139–149.[Medline]
Cande, C., I. Cohen, E. Daugas, L. Ravagnan, N. Larochette, N. Zamzami, and G. Kroemer. 2002. Apoptosis-inducing factor (AIF): a novel caspase-independent death effector released from mitochondria. Biochimie. 84:215–222.[Medline]
Chambers, I., D. Colby, M. Robertson, J. Nichols, S. Lee, S. Tweedie, and A. Smith. 2003. Functional expression cloning of Nanog, a pluripotency sustaining factor in embryonic stem cells. Cell. 113:643–655.[CrossRef][Medline]
Chen, Z.F., A.J. Paquette, and D.J. Anderson. 1998. NRSF/REST is required in vivo for repression of multiple neuronal target genes during embryogenesis. Nat. Genet. 20:136–142.[CrossRef][Medline]
Ciruna, B.G., L. Schwartz, K. Harpal, T.P. Yamaguchi, and J. Rossant. 1997. Chimeric analysis of fibroblast growth factor receptor-1 (Fgfr1) function: a role for FGFR1 in morphogenetic movement through the primitive streak. Development. 124:2829–2841.[Abstract]
Desbaillets, I., U. Ziegler, P. Groscurth, and M. Gassmann. 2000. Embryoid bodies: an in vitro model of mouse embryogenesis. Exp. Physiol. 85:645–651.[Abstract]
Evans, M.J., and M.H. Kaufman. 1981. Establishment in culture of pluripotential cells from mouse embryos. Nature. 292:154–156.[CrossRef][Medline]
Fainsod, A., K. Deissler, R. Yelin, K. Marom, M. Epstein, G. Pillemer, H. Steinbeisser, and M. Blum. 1997. The dorsalizing and neural inducing gene follistatin is an antagonist of BMP-4. Mech. Dev. 63:39–50.[CrossRef][Medline]
Ferrari, G., C.Y. Yan, and L.A. Greene. 1995. N-acetylcysteine (D- and L-stereoisomers) prevents apoptotic death of neuronal cells. J. Neurosci. 15:2857–2866.[Abstract]
Gage, F.H. 2000. Mammalian neural stem cells. Science. 287:1433–1438.
Gamse, J.T., and H. Sive. 2001. Early anteroposterior division of the presumptive neurectoderm in Xenopus. Mech. Dev. 104:21–36.[CrossRef][Medline]
Godsave, S.F., and J.M. Slack. 1991. Single cell analysis of mesoderm formation in the Xenopus embryo. Development. 111:523–530.[Abstract]
Grunz, H., and L. Tacke. 1989. Neural differentiation of Xenopus laevis ectoderm takes place after disaggregation and delayed reaggregation without inducer. Cell Differ. Dev. 28:211–217.[CrossRef][Medline]
Hakem, R., A. Hakem, G.S. Duncan, J.T. Henderson, M. Woo, M.S. Soengas, A. Elia, J.L. de la Pompa, D. Kagi, W. Khoo, et al. 1998. Differential requirement for caspase 9 in apoptotic pathways in vivo. Cell. 94:339–352.[CrossRef][Medline]
Harland, R., and J. Gerhart. 1997. Formation and function of Spemann's organizer. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 13:611–667.[CrossRef][Medline]
Hemmati-Brivanlou, A., and D.A. Melton. 1994. Inhibition of activin receptor signaling promotes neuralization in Xenopus. Cell. 77:273–281.[CrossRef][Medline]
Hemmati-Brivanlou, A., and G.H. Thomsen. 1995. Ventral mesodermal patterning in Xenopus embryos: expression patterns and activities of BMP-2 and BMP-4. Dev. Genet. 17:78–89.[CrossRef][Medline]
Hemmati-Brivanlou, A., O.G. Kelly, and D.A. Melton. 1994. Follistatin, an antagonist of activin, is expressed in the Spemann organizer and displays direct neuralizing activity. Cell. 77:283–295.[CrossRef][Medline]
Hitoshi, S., R.M. Seaberg, C. Koscik, T. Alexson, S. Kusunoki, I. Kanazawa, S. Tsuji, and D. van der Kooy. 2004. Primitive neural stem cells from the mammalian epiblast differentiate to definitive neural stem cells under the control of Notch signaling. Genes Dev. 18:1806–1811.
Joza, N., S.A. Susin, E. Daugas, W.L. Stanford, S.K. Cho, C.Y. Li, T. Sasaki, A.J. Elia, H.Y. Cheng, L. Ravagnan, et al. 2001. Essential role of the mitochondrial apoptosis-inducing factor in programmed cell death. Nature. 410:549–554.[CrossRef][Medline]
Lamb, T.M., A.K. Knecht, W.C. Smith, S.E. Stachel, A.N. Economides, N. Stahl, G.D. Yancopolous, and R.M. Harland. 1993. Neural induction by the secreted polypeptide noggin. Science. 262:713–718.
Lara, J., K. Kusano, S. House, and H. Gainer. 2003. Interactions of cyclic adenosine monophosphate, brain-derived neurotrophic factor, and glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor treatment on the survival and growth of postnatal mesencephalic dopamine neurons in vitro. Exp. Neurol. 180:32–45.[CrossRef][Medline]
Lendahl, U., L.B. Zimmerman, and R.D. McKay. 1990. CNS stem cells express a new class of intermediate filament protein. Cell. 60:585–595.[CrossRef][Medline]
Linker, C., and C.D. Stern. 2004. Neural induction requires BMP inhibition only as a late step, and involves signals other than FGF and Wnt antagonists. Development. 131:5671–5681.
Martin, G.R. 1981. Isolation of a pluripotent cell line from early mouse embryos cultured in medium conditioned by teratocarcinoma stem cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 78:7634–7638.
Mayer, M., and M. Noble. 1994. N-acetyl-L-cysteine is a pluripotent protector against cell death and enhancer of trophic factor-mediated cell survival in vitro. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 91:7496–7500.
Munoz-Sanjuan, I., and A.H. Brivanlou. 2002. Neural induction, the default model and embryonic stem cells. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 3:271–280.[CrossRef][Medline]
Nagy, A., J. Rossant, R. Nagy, W. Abramow-Newerly, and J.C. Roder. 1993. Derivation of completely cell culture-derived mice from early-passage embryonic stem cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 90:8424–8428.
Nichols, J., B. Zevnik, K. Anastassiadis, H. Niwa, D. Klewe-Nebenius, I. Chambers, H. Scholer, and A. Smith. 1998. Formation of pluripotent stem cells in the mammalian embryo depends on the POU transcription factor Oct4. Cell. 95:379–391.[CrossRef][Medline]
Pelton, T.A., S. Sharma, T.C. Schulz, J. Rathjen, and P.D. Rathjen. 2002. Transient pluripotent cell populations during primitive ectoderm formation: correlation of in vivo and in vitro pluripotent cell development. J. Cell Sci. 115:329–339.
Pevny, L.H., S. Sockanathan, M. Placzek, and R. Lovell-Badge. 1998. A role for SOX1 in neural determination. Development. 125:1967–1978.[Abstract]
Piccolo, S., Y. Sasai, B. Lu, and E.M. De Robertis. 1996. Dorsoventral patterning in Xenopus: inhibition of ventral signals by direct binding of chordin to BMP-4. Cell. 86:589–598.[CrossRef][Medline]
Rathjen, J., and P.D. Rathjen. 2001. Mouse ES cells: experimental exploitation of pluripotent differentiation potential. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 11:587–594.[CrossRef][Medline]
Rolletschek, A., H. Chang, K. Guan, J. Czyz, M. Meyer, and A.M. Wobus. 2001. Differentiation of embryonic stem cell-derived dopaminergic neurons is enhanced by survival-promoting factors. Mech. Dev. 105:93–104.[CrossRef][Medline]
Sasai, Y., B. Lu, H. Steinbeisser, and E.M. De Robertis. 1995. Regulation of neural induction by the Chd and Bmp-4 antagonistic patterning signals in Xenopus. Nature. 377:757.[CrossRef][Medline]
Sato, S.M., and T.D. Sargent. 1989. Development of neural inducing capacity in dissociated Xenopus embryos. Dev. Biol. 134:263–266.[CrossRef][Medline]
Schulte-Merker, S., J.C. Smith, and L. Dale. 1994. Effects of truncated activin and FGF receptors and of follistatin on the inducing activities of BVg1 and activin: does activin play a
, P < 0.001 versus control and versus each factor alone. (C) The effectiveness of NAC (1 mM) and pCPT-cAMP (100 µM) in promoting NS formation decreased dramatically with passaging of NSs. *, P < 0.001 versus respective survival factor primary spheres.
