|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Article |
Correspondence to E. Clementi: clementi.emilio{at}hsr.it or; G. Cossu: guilio.cossu{at}hsr.it
 Top Abstract IntroductionResultsDiscussionMaterials and methodsReferences |
|---|
Abbreviations used in this paper: BMP, bone morphogenetic protein; CREB, cAMP response element binding protein; cGMP, cyclic guanosine mono- phosphate; DETA-NO, (Z)-1-[2-(2-aminoethyl)-N-(2-ammonioethyl)amino]diazen-1-ium-1,2-diolate]; E, embryonic day; Fs-luc, luciferase gene; GAPDH, glyceraldehyde3-phosphate dehydrogenase; IGF, insulin-like growth factor; IL-4, interleukin 4; L-NAME, N
-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester; MLC1/3F, myosin light chain promoter 1/3 fast; NFAT, nuclear factor of activated T cells; NO, nitric oxide; NOS, nitric oxide synthase; ODQ, 1H-(1,2,4) oxadiazolo [4,3-
]quinoxalin-1-one; PCNA, DNA polymerase 
cofactor; PSM, presomitic mesoderm; (Rp)-8-pCPT-cGMPS, 8-(chlorophenylthio)guanosine-3',5'- cyclic monophosphorothioate; TSA, trichostatin A.
 |
Introduction |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionResultsDiscussionMaterials and methodsReferences |
|---|
The short-lived messenger nitric oxide (NO) regulates key functions of adult skeletal muscle, such as the activity of neuromuscular synapses, excitation–contraction coupling, vasodilation, glucose uptake, mitochondrial function and biogenesis, glycolysis, and phosphocreatine breakdown (Wang et al., 1995; Balon and Nadler, 1997; Clementi and Meldolesi, 1997; Wolosker et al., 1997; Bredt, 1998; Stamler and Meissner, 2001; Eu et al., 2003; Nisoli et al., 2004). The possibility that NO plays a role in skeletal myogenesis is suggested by the observations that it participates in satellite cell activation (Anderson, 2000; Tatsumi et al., 2002) and that its synthesizing enzymes, the NO synthases (NOSs), are developmentally regulated and may contribute to the myogenic program activated by IGF-II (Lee et al., 1994; Blottner and Luck, 1998; El Dwairi et al., 1998; Kaliman et al., 1999). The precise role of NO in myogenesis and the signaling pathways acting downstream of it are, however, not known.
In the present study, we investigated these aspects, both in vitro and in vivo, at different phases of myogenesis. Our results show that NO directly stimulates myoblast fusion through the up-regulation of follistatin, defining for the first time a link between NO and another key player in adult and embryonic myogenesis. We also found that the action of NO is limited to a defined time window and is mediated through a tightly regulated activation of guanylate cyclase and generation of cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP), a physiological effector of NO (Moncada et al., 1991). Maintenance of cGMP signaling by treatment with 8 Br-cGMP leads to an increased fusion process with generation of hypertrophic myotubes and myofibers in vitro and in vivo. Overall, our results indicate a pivotal role of NO/cGMP in regulating myoblast fusion during muscle development.
|
Results |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionResultsDiscussionMaterials and methodsReferences |
|---|
-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME), which is a broad spectrum inhibitor of NOS (Moncada et al., 1991). The fusion index was measured after 24, 48, or 72 h. As shown in Fig. 1 A, DETA-NO increased, whereas L-NAME decreased, the fusion index in concentration-dependent ways. These effects were specific because the corresponding amine, DETA, did not yield significant effects and the action of L-NAME was inhibited by 5 mM L-arginine (unpublished data). The stimulation by DETA-NO and the inhibition by L-NAME were clearly detected after 24 h and were increased throughout the differentiation program, becoming statistically significant after 48 and 72 h of culture (Fig. 1, B and C). At 72 h, almost no fusion events were observed among myosin-expressing satellite cells in the presence of 5 mM L-NAME (Fig. 1 C). The fact that the effects of DETA-NO and L-NAME on fusion were already present after 24 h of treatment suggests that these events took place at an early stage in the differentiation program. To establish the time window of the NO action, 5 mM L-NAME and 50 µM DETA-NO (yielding a concentration of 120 ± 5 nM, n = 5, measured with a NO electrode; Clementi et al., 1998) were added to differentiating satellite cells at different time points. The fusion index was assessed after 72 h. As shown in Fig. 1 D, both DETA-NO and L-NAME were maximally effective in enhancing and preventing fusion, respectively, when added at the beginning of the differentiation process. The compounds were progressively less effective when added at later time points and almost completely ineffective when added after 16 h. Consistently, we found that the differentiation process was accompanied by an early increase in NOS activity that peaked at 8 h and decreased thereafter, returning to basal levels after 48 h (Fig. 1 E). We found that satellite cells express the endothelial (NOS III) and muscular (NOS Iµ) variants of the neuronal NOS. The levels of expression of NOS III and Iµ were unchanged throughout the differentiation process (Fig. 1 F), indicating that the changes in NOS activity were the consequences of activation and inhibition of enzyme activity and not of changes in protein expression. NOS II expression was never detected throughout the time window analyzed (unpublished data).
|
cofactor (PCNA), which is expressed during the S phase of the cell cycle. We consistently found no increases in either proliferation, measured by counting the number of nuclei in all cells, or the number of nuclei present in myosin-positive cells (unpublished data). This excludes the possibility that the formation of hypernucleated myotubes with increased size was a consequence of an increased number of undifferentiated myogenic cells recruited to terminal differentiation, suggesting that NO acts directly as an inducer of myoblast fusion. The process whereby myogenic cells generate myofibers is the consequence of the initial fusion between two myoblasts and the subsequent fusion of new cells to the initial two-cell myotube (Charge and Rudnicki, 2004). As shown in Fig. 1 H, 5 mM L-NAME increased, whereas 50 µM DETA-NO decreased, the percentage of mononucleated cells. In addition, DETA-NO increased the formation of binucleated cells and multinucleated myotubes, whereas L-NAME reduced the number of myotubes.
The results reported in Fig.1 demonstrate that the activity of NOS and generation of NO are tightly regulated during satellite cell differentiation and that NO triggers and enhances fusion without influencing other events in the differentiation program of these cells. The fact that exogenous NO is not effective when NOS is inhibited suggests that NO signaling is regulated not only at the level of its generation by NOS but also downstream of it.
The effect of NO on satellite cell fusion depends on a controlled generation of cGMP
We next analyzed the dependence of the effects of NO on the activation of guanylate cyclase and generation of cGMP, an important signaling event mediating several physiological actions of NO (Moncada et al., 1991). As shown in Fig. 2 A, differentiation of satellite cells in culture is accompanied by generation of cGMP, occurring in a 4–24-h time window, consistent with the time window of the effect of NO (Fig. 1 E). The generation of cGMP was NO dependent because exposure of differentiating cells to 5 mM L-NAME or 50 µM DETA-NO administered for 30 min at each of the time points indicated in Fig. 2 A inhibited or enhanced, respectively, generation of cGMP. Of importance, the ability of DETA-NO to increase the cyclic nucleotide was significantly higher when it was administered during the first 12 h of the differentiation process. It thereafter declined to a point similar to that of nondifferentiated cells (Fig. 2 A, compare time 72 h with time 0). These results suggest that in satellite cells sensitivity of guanylate cyclase to NO is regulated and its activation favored in the initial phases of differentiation. Because the levels of expression of the two guanylate cyclase subunits 
and ß did not change with time (Fig. 2 B), it appears that such regulation occurs through posttranslational events.
|
]quinoxalin-1-one (ODQ; 3 µM), which were administered in the 4–24-h time window in which these cells generate cGMP. Satellite cell fusion was measured after 72 h. As shown in Fig. 2(C–E), 8 BrcGMP and ODQ mimicked the effects of DETA-NO and L-NAME, respectively. In addition, the fusogenic effect of DETA-NO, although insensitive to L-NAME, was abrogated by ODQ. ODQ, however, did not affect fusion stimulated by 8 Br-cGMP. These results clearly indicate that the effect of NO on satellite cell fusion depends on activation of guanylate cyclase and generation of cGMP. The results depicted in Fig. 1 suggest that NO signaling is regulated not only at the level of its generation by NOS but also downstream of it. The results in Fig. 2, showing the cGMP dependence of the effect of NO and the time-dependent changes in the sensitivity of guanylate cyclase to NO, indicate that this regulatory step downstream of NOS activity is at the level of guanylate cyclase.
Persistence of cGMP during satellite cell differentiation and embryonic myogenesis leads to hypertrophy
We examined whether the tight regulation of the NO/cGMP signaling during the differentiation process is needed to prevent nonphysiological overgrowth of the myotube. We investigated this possibility by both in vitro and in vivo approaches. To mimic deregulated cGMP signaling in satellite cells, differentiation was performed in the continuous presence of 0.3–3 mM 8 Br-cGMP. In addition, satellite cells were plated at high density (3 x 104 cells/cm2) to favor fusion. After 48 h of differentiation under these conditions, satellite cells gave rise to distinctly hypertrophic myotubes (Fig. 3 A). Hypertrophy induction was concentration dependent, as it was the increase in myosin expression (Fig. 3 C). The myotubes in 8 Br-cGMP–treated cultures were considered to be hypertophic because their mean nuclei number and fiber dimension (Fig. 3 B) and the total amount of myosin (Fig. 3 C) were significantly higher compared with controls and were increased by the cyclic nucleotide in a concentration-dependent way. Such hypertrophy and increase in myosin were not observed in satellite cells differentiated in the presence of 50–300 µM DETA-NO, even at the higher concentrations tested (Fig. 3, A–C; and not depicted).
|
To study myogenesis during late embryonic and fetal development, MLC1/3F-nLacZ pregnant females were treated with or without 8 Br-cGMP (3 g/kg body weight) from gestation day 10 to either 12.5 or 15.5. Embryos were then recovered, and myogenic cells were revealed by LacZ staining. As shown in Fig. 3 F, 8 Br-cGMP–treated embryos showed enhanced LacZ staining, indicating an increased level of myogenesis at both time points considered. These results clearly indicate that continuous presence of cGMP increases myotube size and results in muscle hypertrophy and that the tight regulation of its concentration is required for a normal myogenic process.
The NO/cGMP signaling in myogenesis is mediated by the up-regulation of follistatin expression through transcriptional activation mediated by NFAT/ CREB/MyoD
We were interested in identifying the molecular effectors of the NO/cGMP signaling and to assess whether molecules known to play a role in muscle hypertrophy, such as IGF-I (Musaro and Rosenthal, 1999; Rommel et al., 2001), interleukin 4 (IL-4; Horsley et al., 2003), or follistatin (Iezzi et al., 2004), were involved.
We thus performed semiquantitative RT-PCR on RNA isolated from differentiated satellite cells, PSM explants, or muscle from embryonic and fetal stages that were treated or untreated with 3 mM 8 Br-cGMP, 50 µM DETA-NO, or 5 mM L-NAME using primer specific for IGF-I, IL-4, follistatin, myostatin, and skeletal muscle–specific MLC1/3F (Fig. 4 A). In parallel, we examined the expression of IGF-I, IL-4, follistatin, myostatin, and sarcomeric myosin heavy chain by Western blotting (Fig. 4 B). Quantitative assessment and statistical analyses of the results obtained are shown in Fig. S1 (available at http://www.jcb.org/cgi/content/full/jcb.200507083/DC1).
|
Follistatin has recently been described to be a central mediator of the fusogenic effects exerted by deacetylase inhibitors on myoblast fusion into preformed myotubes through a pathway distinct from those used by either IGF-I or IL-4 (Iezzi et al., 2004). In particular, regulation of follistatin by deacetylase inhibitors, such as trichostatin A (TSA), appeared to be cooperatively activated by MyoD, nuclear factor of activated T cells (NFAT), and cAMP response element binding protein (CREB; Iezzi et al., 2004).
To investigate whether the NO–cGMP pathway activated the follistatin promoter by the same pathway, we used the myogenic cell line C2C12, which was also used in Iezzi et al. (2004). Similar to satellite cells, C2C12 myoblasts gave rise to hypertrophic myotubes when cultured in the constant presence of 8 Br-cGMP (Fig. 5, A and B). This was accompanied by concentration-dependent increases in the levels of follistatin (Fig. 5 C). To study the effect on follistatin transcription, the fol- listatin promoter linked to the luciferase gene (Fs-Luc) was transfected in C2C12 cells (Iezzi et al., 2004). 8 Br-cGMP activated transcription of Fs-Luc (Fig. 5 D). To establish whether the activation of follistatin promoter by cGMP was mediated by MyoD, CREB, and NFAT, Fs-Luc–transfected C2C12 were differentiated in the presence of 8 Br-cGMP and/or transfected with the negative regulator of MyoD; Id1 (Iezzi et al., 2004); or the dominant-negative form of CREB, A-CREB (Herzig et al., 2001), or VIVIT, which is a peptide that blocks NFAT-dependent transcription (Aramburu et al., 1999). We observed that the 8 Br-cGMP–dependent activation of Fs-Luc was inhibited in the presence of any of these inhibitors (Fig. 5 D). Thus, NFAT, MyoD, and CREB mediate the effects of 8 Br-cGMP on follistatin transcription. Previous studies in other cell types showed that CREB and NFAT are activated by cGMP through a protein kinase G–dependent phosphorylation (Gudi et al., 1996; Pilz and Casteel, 2003; Gonzalez Bosc et al., 2004). Accordingly, we found that 3 µM each of two structurally unrelated protein kinase G inhibitors, KT5823 and 8-(chlorophenylthio)guanosine 3',5'- cyclic monophosphorothioate ([Rp]-8-pCPT-cGMPS; Smolenski et al., 1998), prevented the induction of Fs-Luc transcription by cGMP (Fig. 5 D). In smooth muscle, cGMP may act through protein kinase A, an enzyme that plays a role in selected myogenic pathways (Cornwell et al., 1994; Chen et al., 2005). The possible involvement of protein kinase A in mediating the effects of cGMP, however, was excluded by the lack of inhibitory effects by 3 µM of the protein kinase A inhibitors KT5720 and (Rp)-8-pCPT-cAMPS (Fig. 5 D).
|
|
Discussion |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionResultsDiscussionMaterials and methodsReferences |
|---|
Myoblast fusion is a multiple-step process involving cell migration, alignment, recognition, adhesion, and membrane fusion (Wakelam, 1985; Chen and Olson, 2004), and several molecules have been identified as playing a role in one or more of these processes, including IL-4, IGFs, integrins, and metalloproteases (Galliano et al., 2000; Rommel et al., 2001; Horsley et al., 2003; Schwander et al., 2003; Yi et al., 2005). The mechanisms and signaling pathways underlying the role of these molecules controlling myoblast fusion, however, have yet to be fully elucidated.
We demonstrate that the generation of NO is crucial to myoblast fusion in mammals. We found that the action of NO has several important characteristics. (a) It appears to have an effect at critical stages of pre- and postnatal muscle development life. (b) It works through the same signaling pathway at all stages, i.e., activation of guanylate cyclase, with generation of cGMP and induction of follistatin. (c) It is specific to the fusion process itself because NO did not affect cellular differentiation and/or proliferation. This defines for the first time a common trigger for fusion and is the first evidence indicating that the fusion process may take place through the same activating process in both the embryo and the newborn.
Another important aspect of the pathway to muscle fusion activated by NO emerging from our results is that it is a regulated process. We have studied it in detail in satellite cells. We found that the regulation of NO effects on muscle fusion occurred at two distinct early steps of the signaling cascade, i.e., the enzymatic activities of NOS and guanylate cyclase, which were regulated in the absence of detectable changes in protein levels. The regulation of guanylate cyclase appears to be particularly important because activation of the enzyme could not be increased even by administration of exogenous NO. We have not yet identified which events among the ones proposed to induce desensitization of guanylate cyclase to NO, e.g., phosphorylation by protein kinases or even a direct action of NO itself (Bellamy et al., 2000; Friebe and Koesling, 2003), play a role in the desensitization observed here. The physiological relevance of this event, however, is clear because deregulation of cGMP signaling leads to muscle hypertrophy both in satellite cells and in the embryo. More strikingly, myoblasts differentiating from the PSM, known to be incompetent for fusion (Cossu and Biressi, 2005), acquire such competence in the presence of cGMP, suggesting that the NO–cGMP pathway not only is crucial to stimulating fusion but also may confer competence to it. Whether and how this occurs when the mononucleated myocytes of the myotome are incorporated into newly formed primary fibers remains to be studied.
Of the three NOS isoforms, murine (and human) skeletal muscles express the constitutive NOS Iµ and III, whereas expression of the inducible NOS II is clearly detected only in the presence of inflammation or other pathological conditions (Thompson et al., 1996; Stamler and Meissner, 2001). Accordingly, we found that satellite cells and skeletal muscle from embryos (unpublished data) express NOS Iµ and III. However, it is conceivable that both enzymes may play a role because both NOS Iµ and III are activated by increases in intracellular calcium concentrations, and NOS III is also activated by Akt (Alderton et al., 2001), i.e., signaling events triggered by many myogenic stimuli (Guttridge, 2004; Horsley and Pavlath, 2004). In addition, no obvious defects in muscle development have been reported in NOS I or III knockout mice. Also interesting in this respect is the observation that expression and activities of both NOS Iµ and III are developmentally regulated (Blottner and Luck, 1998; El Dwairi et al., 1998).
The identification of a link between follistatin and the NO/cGMP–dependent fusion adds important new information to skeletal muscle biology. Follistatin is a protein that interacts with and regulates the biological activities of several TGFß family members, including BMP-4, BMP-7, and activins (Iemura et al., 1998; Amthor et al., 2002). Follistatin has been also found to block the activity of myostatin, a negative regulator of skeletal muscle mass, thus leading to muscle hypertrophy (Lee and McPherron, 2001). Therefore, the connection of this protein with NO/cGMP identifies an endogenously activated pathway for follistatin induction that can be activated by many myogenic stimuli and defines the role of NO in the process of fusion.
The pathway of follistatin induction by NO/cGMP was found to involve MyoD, NFAT, and CREB. Previous work has demonstrated that both CREB and NFAT are directly activated by NO/cGMP through protein kinase G–dependent phosphorylation (Gudi et al., 1996; Fiedler et al., 2002; Pilz and Casteel, 2003; Gonzalez Bosc et al., 2004). The fact that inhibition of protein kinase G prevented follistatin induction by cGMP is consistent with these results and further confirms the role of CREB and NFAT. We found that expression of MyoD is not affected by NO/cGMP; whether this transcription factor is activated by NO/cGMP through phosphorylation, similar to other MyoD activating stimuli, remains to be established. The biological significance of each of these transcription factors in mediating the effect of NO/cGMP, however, clearly emerges from our results because each of them was found to be necessary to follistatin induction. Indeed, specific inhibition of MyoD, NFAT, or CREB was sufficient to prevent the transcriptional function of cGMP. Furthermore, these results suggest that the transcriptional effects of NO/cGMP may be more complex than previously envisaged. The fact that MyoD, CREB, and NFAT appear to be necessary to mediate the transcriptional effect of NO/cGMP resembles the situation already described for stimulation of myoblast fusion by the deacteylase inhibitor TSA (Iezzi et al., 2004). The similarity between the action of TSA and NO/cGMP and the recent evidence showing that TSA is able to up-regulate the expression of NOS III in nonendothelial cells (Fish et al., 2005; Gan et al., 2005) suggests that NO/cGMP is involved in regulating the process of acetylation. Interestingly, the effect of NO/cGMP, similar to that of TSA (Iezzi et al., 2004), was restricted to cells of skeletal muscle origin. This cell specificity is intriguing, and the mechanisms beyond it need to be investigated further.
In conclusion, the link emerging here among the NO/cGMP signaling and follistatin induction, an important event during prenatal and adult myogenesis, suggests that the role of this messenger may be broader than previously envisaged and at the crossroad of different signaling pathways central to skeletal muscle development and regeneration. The action mediated through cGMP/follistatin might also synergize with other known ac- tions of NO, such as activation of satellite cells (Anderson, 2000; Tatsumi et al., 2002). In addition, the cGMP-dependent induction of follistatin might interact with other cGMP-independent actions of NO that may play a role in muscle development, such as inhibition of cytochrome c oxidase and control of mitochondrial respiration and S-nitros(yl)ation (Stamler and Meissner, 2001; Moncada and Erusalimsky, 2002).
|
Materials and methods |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionResultsDiscussionMaterials and methodsReferences |
|---|
Cell cultures
Satellite cells were isolated from 3–5-d-old mice as described previously (Cossu et al., 1980) with some modifications. In particular, after 3 d of isolation, proliferating myoblasts were harvested, counted, and plated on tissue culture plastic dishes coated with 1 mg/ml type I collagen. After 2 d of proliferation in growth medium, myogenic cells accounted for >90% of the cultures as revealed by anti-desmin immunostaining assay. Preparation showing <90% myogenic cells were discarded. Myoblasts were shifted to differentiating medium in the presence or absence of drugs as indicated in Results. Growth medium contained Iscove's modified Dulbecco's medium supplemented with 20% FBS, 3% chick embryo extract (Cossu et al., 1987), 100 U/ml penicillin, 100 µg/ml streptomycin, and 50 µg/ml gentamycin. Differentiation medium contained Iscove's modified Dulbecco's medium supplemented with 2% horse serum, 100 U/ml penicillin, and 100 µg/ml streptomycin. Fusion index was determined as the number of nuclei in sarcomeric myosin–expressing cells with more than two nuclei versus the total number of nuclei.
C2C12 cells were cultured in DME supplemented with 15% FBS, 100 U/ml penicillin, and 100 µg/ml streptomycin and differentiated in DME supplemented with 2% horse serum, 100 U/ml penicillin, and 100 µg/ml streptomycin as described previously (Iezzi et al., 2004).
Immunofluorescence
Immunofluorescence on cells and explants was performed as described previously (Brunelli et al., 2004), using the following antibodies: MF20 (1:3) and anti-desmin (1:400).
Protein extraction and immunoblot analysis
Cells were washed free of medium and solubilized by direct addition of a preheated (to 80°C) denaturing buffer containing 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 6.8, 2% sodium dodecyl sulfate, and a Complete protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche) and immediately boiled for 2 min as previously described (Bulotta et al., 2001). Alternatively, muscle tissues from embryos were dissected and homogenized in 50 mM Tris/HCl, pH 7.4, 1 mM EGTA, 1 mM EDTA, 1% Triton X-100, and Complete protease inhibitor cocktail and centrifuged (1,000 g) for 20 min at 20°C to discard cellular debris. For secreted proteins analysis, supernatants were collected and concentrated as described previously (Corradi et al., 1996). After addition of 0.05% bromophenol blue, 10% glycerol, and 2% ß-mercaptoethanol, samples were boiled again and loaded onto 10% SDS–polyacrylamide gels. After electrophoresis, polypeptides were electrophoretically transferred to nitrocellulose filters (Schleicher & Schuell) and antigens were revealed by the appropriate respective primary and secondary antibodies (Bulotta et al., 2001).
Assay of NOS activity
The time course of NOS activity was assayed in intact cells by measuring the conversion of L-[3H]-arginine into L-[3H]-citrulline as described previously (Bulotta et al., 2001). In brief, the reaction was performed in 145 mM NaCl, 5 mM KCl, 1 mM MgSO4, 10 mM glucose, 1 mM CaCl2, and 10 mM Hepes, pH 7.4. 10 µCi/ml L-[3H]-arginine (10 µM) was added at various time points, and the reaction was stopped after 5 min by washing with ice-cold PBS supplemented with 5 mM L-arginine and 4 mM EDTA. 0.5 ml of 100% cold ethanol was added to the dishes and left to evaporate before a final addition of 20 mM Hepes, pH 6.0. L-NAME–treated cells were run in parallel as control of specificity. Separation of L-[3H]-citrulline from L-[3H]-arginine was performed by DOWEX 50X8-400 chromatography. L-[3H]-citrulline formed was normalized to protein content and evaluated by the bicinchoninic acid procedure.
Measurement of cGMP generation
At each time point, satellite cell cultures were incubated for 30 min at 37°C either in growth or in differentiation media with 0.5 mM of the phosphodiesterase inhibitor 3-isobutyl-1-methylxanthine supplemented with 50 µM DETA-NO, 5 mM L-NAME, or vehicle. The reaction was terminated by rapid medium removal and washing with ice-cold PBS and was lysed by the addition of ice-cold trichloroacetic acid (final concentration: 6%). After ether extraction, cGMP levels were measured using a radioimmunoassay kit and normalized to protein content.
Embryo explants culture
PSM and most of the five caudal somites were dissected, together with fragmentation of the neural tube from MLC1/3F E9.5 embryos, and cultured as explants, as described previously (Cossu et al., 1996). Differentiation was continued for 2–4 d in the presence of various drugs, as described in Results. Before the immunofluorescence assay, X-Gal staining was performed according to standard protocols (Brunelli et al., 2003).
Animal treatments
MLC1/3F pregnant females were treated with or without 8 Br-cGMP (3 g/kg body weight; administered in drinking water) from gestation day 10 to 12.5 or 15.5. Embryos were then recovered, and myogenic cells were revealed by X-Gal staining (see Embryo explants culture). Animals were housed in the pathogen-free facility at the Stem Cell Research Institute (Milan, Italy) and treated in accordance with the European Community guidelines and with the approval of the Institutional Ethical Committee.
RT-PCR
1 µg RNA was collected from cells, dissected embryos, or tissues using RNeasy mini (or micro) kit (QIAGEN) and was converted into double-stranded cDNA by reverse transcription using the cDNA synthesis kit Thermoscript RT-PCR system (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer's instructions. cDNA was then amplified using the following primers: follistatin forward, CTCTTCAAGTGGATGATTTTC, and reverse, ACAGTAGGCATTATTGGTCTG; GAPDH forward, TGAAGGTCGGAGTCAACGGATTTGGT, and reverse, CATGTGGGCCATGAGGTCCACCAC; IGF-1 forward, GTGGATGCTCTTCAGTTCGT, and reverse, ACACTCCTAAAGACGATGTT; IL4 forward, AACCCCCAGCTAGTTGTCATCCTG, and reverse, CATCGAAAAGCCCGAAAGAGTCTC; MLC3F forward, GATCACCTTAAGTCAGGT, and reverse, GCAACGCTTCTACCTCTT; myostatin forward, AGCCTGAATCCAACTTAGGC, and reverse, GGTGCACAAGATGAGTATGC.
Plasmids and transfections
500 bp of the rat follistatin proximal promoter linked to the luciferase was derived from the 2.8-Kb rat follistatin promoter–luciferase construct (Bilezikjian et al., 2001). Id, VIVIT, and A-CREB expression vectors have been described before (Iezzi et al., 2004). The transfections were performed with the FuGENE6 reagent (Roche). Luciferase assay on cell lysates was performed as described previously (Iezzi et al., 2004).
Statistical analysis
The results are expressed as means ± SEM. Statistical analysis was performed using a two-tailed t test for unpaired variables. Asterisks and crosses in the figure panels refer to statistical probabilities, measured in the various experimental conditions as detailed in the figure legends. Statistical probability values of <0.05 were considered significant.
Image acquisition and manipulation
Images in fluorescence have been taken on a microscope (Eclipse E600; Nikon; plan fluor 4x/0.13, 10x/0.33, 20x/0.50, and 40x/0.75) and phase-contrast images of embryos on stereomicroscope (SMZ1500; Nikon; high-resolution plan apochromatic 1x WD54, eyepiece lens CW 10x/22). All images were acquired using a digital camera (DXM1200; Nikon) and the acquisition software ACT-1 (Nikon), imaging medium, PBS buffer, and room temperature. Images were assembled in panels using Photoshop 7.0 (Adobe). Images showing double fluorescence (FITC and Hoechst) were first separately acquired using the different appropriate filters and then merged with Photoshop 7.0.
Online supplemental material
Fig. S1 shows the densitometric quantification of RT-PCR and Western blots analysis shown in Fig. 4. Fig. S2 shows that inhibition of follistatin expression by RNA interference abolishes the effect of NO/cGMP on fusion-induced muscle hypertophy in C2C12. Fig. S3 shows that the NO/cGMP effect on follistatin induction is specific to skeletal myoblasts. Supplemental text describes the methods used in the RNA interference and in the culture of cardiomyocytes and of C3H10 T1/2, NIH 3T3, P19, and D351 cells. Online supplemental material is available at http://www.jcb.org/cgi/content/full/jcb.200507083/DC1.
|
Acknowledgments |
|---|
Submitted: 18 July 2005
Accepted: 16 December 2005
|
References |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionResultsDiscussionMaterials and methodsReferences |
|---|
Alderton, W.K., C.E. Cooper, and R.G. Knowles. 2001. Nitric oxide synthases: structure, function and inhibition. Biochem. J. 357:593–615.[CrossRef][Medline]
Amthor, H., B. Christ, F. Rashid-Doubell, C.F. Kemp, E. Lang, and K. Patel. 2002. Follistatin regulates bone morphogenetic protein-7 (BMP-7) activity to stimulate embryonic muscle growth. Dev. Biol. 243:115–127.[CrossRef][Medline]
Anderson, J.E. 2000. A role for nitric oxide in muscle repair: nitric oxide-mediated activation of muscle satellite cells. Mol. Biol. Cell. 11:1859–1874.
Aramburu, J., M.B. Yaffe, C. Lopez-Rodriguez, L.C. Cantley, P.G. Hogan, and A. Rao. 1999. Affinity-driven peptide selection of an NFAT inhibitor more selective than cyclosporin A. Science. 285:2129–2133.
Balemans, W., and W. Van Hul. 2002. Extracellular regulation of BMP signaling in vertebrates: a cocktail of modulators. Dev. Biol. 250:231–250.[CrossRef][Medline]
Balon, T.W., and J.L. Nadler. 1997. Evidence that nitric oxide increases glucose transport in skeletal muscle. J. Appl. Physiol. 82:359–363.
Bellamy, T.C., J. Wood, D.A. Goodwin, and J. Garthwaite. 2000. Rapid desensitization of the nitric oxide receptor, soluble guanylyl cyclase, underlies diversity of cellular cGMP responses. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 97:2928–2933.
Bilezikjian, L.M., A.Z. Corrigan, A.L. Blount, Y. Chen, and W.W. Vale. 2001. Regulation and actions of Smad7 in the modulation of activin, inhibin, and transforming growth factor-ß signaling in anterior pituitary cells. Endocrinology. 142:1065–1072.
Blottner, D., and G. Luck. 1998. Nitric oxide synthase (NOS) in mouse skeletal muscle development and differentiated myoblasts. Cell Tissue Res. 292:293–302.[CrossRef][Medline]
Bredt, D.S. 1998. NO skeletal muscle derived relaxing factor in Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 95:14592–14593.
Brunelli, S., E. Casey, D. Bell, R. Harland, and R. Lovell-Badge. 2003. Expression of Sox3 throughout the developing central nervous system is dependent on the combined action of discrete, evolutionarily conserved regulatory elements. Genesis. 36:12–24.[CrossRef][Medline]
Brunelli, S., E. Tagliafico, F.G. De Angelis, R. Tonlorenzi, S. Baesso, S. Ferrari, M. Niinobe, K. Yoshikawa, R.J. Schwartz, I. Bozzoni, and G. Cossu. 2004. Msx2 and necdin combined activities are required for smooth muscle differentiation in mesoangioblast stem cells. Circ. Res. 94:1571–1578.
Buckingham, M., L. Bajard, T. Chang, P. Daubas, J. Hadchouel, S. Meilhac, D. Montarras, D. Rocancourt, and F. Relaix. 2003. The formation of skeletal muscle: from somite to limb. J. Anat. 202:59–68.[CrossRef][Medline]
Bulotta, S., R. Barsacchi, D. Rotiroti, N. Borgese, and E. Clementi. 2001. Activation of the endothelial nitric-oxide synthase by tumor necrosis factor-alpha. A novel feedback mechanism regulating cell death. J. Biol. Chem. 276:6529–6536.
Charge, S.B., and M.A. Rudnicki. 2004. Cellular and molecular regulation of muscle regeneration. Physiol. Rev. 84:209–238.
Chen, A.E., D.D. Ginty, and C.M. Fan. 2005. Protein kinase A signalling via CREB controls myogenesis induced by Wnt proteins. Nature. 433:317–322.[CrossRef][Medline]
Chen, E.H., and E.N. Olson. 2004. Towards a molecular pathway for myoblast fusion in Drosophila. Trends Cell Biol. 14:452–460.
Clementi, E., and J. Meldolesi. 1997. The cross-talk between nitric oxide and Ca2+: a story with a complex past and a promising future. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 18:266–269.[Medline]
Clementi, E., G.C. Brown, M. Feelisch, and S. Moncada. 1998. Persistent inhibition of cell respiration by nitric oxide: crucial role of S-nitrosylation of mitochondrial complex I and protective action of glutathione. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 95:7631–7636.
Cornwell, T.L., E. Arnold, N.J. Boerth, and T.M. Lincoln. 1994. Inhibition of smooth muscle cell growth by nitric oxide and activation of cAMP-dependent protein kinase by cGMP. Am. J. Physiol. 267:C1405–C1413.
Corradi, N., B. Borgonovo, E. Clementi, M. Bassetti, G. Racchetti, G.G. Consalez, W.B. Huttner, J. Meldolesi, and P. Rosa. 1996. Overall lack of regulated secretion in a PC12 variant cell clone. J. Biol. Chem. 271:27116–27124.
Cossu, G., and S. Biressi. 2005. Satellite cells, myoblasts and other occasional myogenic progenitors: possible origin, phenotypic features and role in muscle regeneration. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 16:623–631.[CrossRef][Medline]
Cossu, G., B. Zani, M. Coletta, M. Bouche, M. Pacifici, and M. Molinaro. 1980. In vitro differentiation of satellite cells isolated from normal and dystrophic mammalian muscles. A comparison with embryonic myogenic cells. Cell Differ. 9:357–368.[CrossRef][Medline]
Cossu, G., F. Eusebi, F. Grassi, and E. Wanke. 1987. Acetylcholine receptor channels are present in undifferentiated satellite cells but not in embryonic myoblasts in culture. Dev. Biol. 123:43–50.[CrossRef][Medline]
Cossu, G., R. Kelly, S. Tajbakhsh, S. Di Donna, E. Vivarelli, and M. Buckingham. 1996. Activation of different myogenic pathways: Myf5 is induced by the neural tube and MyoD by the dorsal ectoderm in mouse paraxial mesoderm. Development. 122:429–437.[Abstract]
Cusella-De Angelis, M.G., S. Molinari, A. Le Donne, M. Coletta, E. Vivarelli, M. Bouche, M. Molinaro, S. Ferrari, and G. Cossu. 1994. Differential response of embryonic and fetal myoblasts to TGFß: a possible regulatory mechanism of skeletal muscle histogenesis. Development. 120:925–933.[Abstract]
El Dwairi, Q., Y. Guo, A. Comtois, E. Zhu, M.T. Greenwood, D.S. Bredt, and S.N. Hussain. 1998. Ontogenesis of nitric oxide synthases in the ventilatory muscles. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 18:844–852.
Eu, J.P., J.M. Hare, D.T. Hess, M. Skaf, J. Sun, I. Cardenas-Navina, Q.A. Sun, M. Dewhirst, G. Meissner, and J.S. Stamler. 2003. Concerted regulation of skeletal muscle contractility by oxygen tension and endogenous nitric oxide. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 100:15229–15234.
Fiedler, B., S.M. Lohmann, A. Smolenski, S. Linnemuller, B. Pieske, F. Schroder, J.D. Molkentin, H. Drexler, and K.C. Wollert. 2002. Inhibition of calcineurin-NFAT hypertrophy signaling by cGMP-dependent protein kinase type I in cardiac myocytes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 99:11363–11368.
Fish, J.E., C.C. Matouk, A. Rachlis, S. Lin, S.C. Tai, C. D'Abreo, and P.A. Marsden. 2005. The expression of endothelial nitric-oxide synthase is controlled by a cell-specific histone code. J. Biol. Chem. 280:24824–24838.
Friebe, A., and D. Koesling. 2003. Regulation of nitric oxide-sensitive guanylyl cyclase. Circ. Res. 93:96–105.
Galliano, M.F., C. Huet, J. Frygelius, A. Polgren, U.M. Wewer, and E. Engvall. 2000. Binding of ADAM12, a marker of skeletal muscle regeneration, to the muscle-specific actin-binding protein, -actinin-2, is required for myoblast fusion. J. Biol. Chem. 275:13933–13939.
Gan, Y., Y.H. Shen, J. Wang, X. Wang, B. Utama, and X.L. Wang. 2005. Role of histone deacetylation in cell-specific expression of endothelial nitric-oxide synthase. J. Biol. Chem. 280:16467–16475.
Glass, D.J. 2003. Signalling pathways that mediate skeletal muscle hypertrophy and atrophy. Nat. Cell Biol. 5:87–90.[CrossRef][Medline]
Gonzalez Bosc, L.V., M.K. Wilkerson, K.N. Bradley, D.M. Eckman, D.C. Hill-Eubanks, and M.T. Nelson. 2004. Intraluminal pressure is a stimulus for NFATc3 nuclear accumulation: role of calcium, endothelium-derived nitric oxide, and cGMP-dependent protein kinase. J. Biol. Chem. 279:10702–10709.
Gudi, T., I. Huvar, M. Meinecke, S.M. Lohmann, G.R. Boss, and R.B. Pilz. 1996. Regulation of gene expression by cGMP-dependent protein kinase. Transactivation of the c-fos promoter. J. Biol. Chem. 271:4597–4600.
Guttridge, D.C. 2004. Signaling pathways weigh in on decisions to make or break skeletal muscle. Curr. Opin. Clin. Nutr. Metab. Care. 7:443–450.[CrossRef][Medline]
Herzig, S., F. Long, U.S. Jhala, S. Hedrick, R. Quinn, A. Bauer, D. Rudolph, G. Schutz, C. Yoon, P. Puigserver, et al. 2001. CREB regulates hepatic gluconeogenesis through the coactivator PGC-1. Nature. 413:179–183.[CrossRef][Medline]
Horsley, V., and G.K. Pavlath. 2004. Forming a multinucleated cell: molecules that regulate myoblast fusion. Cells Tissues Organs. 176:67–78.[CrossRef][Medline]
Horsley, V., K.M. Jansen, S.T. Mills, and G.K. Pavlath. 2003. IL-4 acts as a myoblast recruitment factor during mammalian muscle growth. Cell. 113:483–494.[CrossRef][Medline]
Ibarra, C., M. Estrada, L. Carrasco, M. Chiong, J.L. Liberona, C. Cardenas, G. Diaz-Araya, E. Jaimovich, and S. Lavandero. 2004. Insulin-like growth factor-1 induces an inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate-dependent increase in nuclear and cytosolic calcium in cultured rat cardiac myocytes. J. Biol. Chem. 279:7554–7565.
Iemura, S., T.S. Yamamoto, C. Takagi, H. Uchiyama, T. Natsume, S. Shimasaki, H. Sugino, and N. Ueno. 1998. Direct binding of follistatin to a complex of bone-morphogenetic protein and its receptor inhibits ventral and epidermal cell fates in early Xenopus embryo. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 95:9337–9342.
Iezzi, S., M. Di Padova, C. Serra, G. Caretti, C. Simone, E. Maklan, G. Minetti, P. Zhao, E.P. Hoffman, P.L. Puri, and V. Sartorelli. 2004. Deacetylase inhibitors increase muscle cell size by promoting myoblast recruitment and fusion through induction of follistatin. Dev. Cell. 6:673–684.[CrossRef][Medline]
Kaliman, P., J. Canicio, X. Testar, M. Palacin, and A. Zorzano. 1999. Insulin-like growth factor-II, phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase, nuclear factor-
B and inducible nitric-oxide synthase define a common myogenic signaling pathway. J. Biol. Chem. 274:17437–17444.
Kelly, R., S. Alonso, S. Tajbakhsh, G. Cossu, and M. Buckingham. 1995. Myosin light chain 3F regulatory sequences confer regionalized cardiac and skeletal muscle expression in transgenic mice. J. Cell Biol. 129:383–396.
Lee, K.H., M.Y. Baek, K.Y. Moon, W.K. Song, C.H. Chung, D.B. Ha, and M.S. Kang. 1994. Nitric oxide as a messenger molecule for myoblast fusion. J. Biol. Chem. 269:14371–14374.
Lee, S.J., and A.C. McPherron. 2001. Regulation of myostatin activity and muscle growth. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 98:9306–9311.
Moncada, S., and J.D. Erusalimsky. 2002. Does nitric oxide modulate mitochondrial energy generation and apoptosis? Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 3:214–220.[CrossRef][Medline]
Moncada, S., R.M. Palmer, and E.A. Higgs. 1991. Nitric oxide: physiology, pathophysiology, and pharmacology. Pharmacol. Rev. 43:109–142.[Medline]
Musaro, A., and N. Rosenthal. 1999. Maturation of the myogenic program is induced by postmitotic expression of insulin-like growth factor I. Mol. Cell. Biol. 19:3115–3124.
Nisoli, E., S. Falcone, C. Tonello, V. Cozzi, L. Palomba, M. Fiorani, A. Pisconti, S. Brunelli, A. Cardile, M. Francolini, et al. 2004. Mitochondrial biogenesis by NO yields functionally active mitochondria in mammals. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 101:16507–16512.
Ontell, M., and K. Kozeka. 1984. The organogenesis of murine striated muscle: a cytoarchitectural study. Am. J. Anat. 171:133–148.[CrossRef][Medline]
Parker, M., P. Seale, and M.A. Rudnicki. 2003. Looking back to the embryo: defining transcriptional networks in adult myogenesis. Nat. Rev. Genet. 4:497–507.[Medline]
Pilz, R.B., and D.E. Casteel. 2003. Regulation of gene expression by cyclic GMP. Circ. Res. 93:1034–1046.
Relaix, F., D. Rocancourt, A. Mansouri, and M. Buckingham. 2005. A Pax3/Pax7-dependent population of skeletal muscle progenitor cells. Nature. 435:948–953.[CrossRef][Medline]
Rommel, C., S.C. Bodine, B.A. Clarke, R. Rossman, L. Nunez, T.N. Stitt, G.D. Yancopoulos, and D.J. Glass. 2001. Mediation of IGF-1-induced skeletal myotube hypertrophy by PI(3)K/Akt/mTOR and PI(3)K/Akt/GSK3 pathways. Nat. Cell Biol. 3:1009–1013.[CrossRef][Medline]
Schwander, M., M. Leu, M. Stumm, O.M. Dorchies, U.T. Ruegg, J. Schittny, and U. Muller. 2003. Beta1 integrins regulate myoblast fusion and sarcomere assembly. Dev. Cell. 4:673–685.[CrossRef][Medline]
Smolenski, A., A.M. Burkhardt, M. Eigenthaler, E. Butt, S. Gambaryan, S.M. Lohmann, and U. Walter. 1998. Functional analysis of cGMP-dependent protein kinases I and II as mediators of NO/cGMP effects. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch. Pharmacol. 358:134–139.[CrossRef][Medline]
Stamler, J.S., and G. Meissner. 2001. Physiology of nitric oxide in skeletal muscle. Physiol. Rev. 81:209–237.
, P < 0.001 versus8 Br-cGMP–treated cells (n = 6). Error bars represent SEM. Bar, 200 µm.
