Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents

This Article PPT slides of all figures Alert me when this article is cited Services Email this article Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new content in the JCB Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via CrossRef Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by LeBrasseur, N. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by LeBrasseur, N. Social Bookmarking                      What's this?

XX meetings

X chromosomes (red and green) meet transiently (left to right) before one is inactivated. LEE/AAAS

An interphase meeting between X chromosomes, revealed by Na Xu, Chia-Lun Tsai, and Jeannie Lee (Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA), ensures that one and only one is silenced.

Silencing of one of the two X chromosomes in a female somatic cell brings the gene dosage level down to that of male cells. Inactivation is controlled by several noncoding RNAs transcribed from, and acting in cis upon, the X inactivation center (XIC). But the field has been perplexed as to how one chromosome knows what the other is doing to keep inactivation mutually exclusive.

The new results suggest that a prior meeting between X chromosomes sets the decision. Although mammalian chromosomes normally only pair during meiosis, the authors saw transient contact between X chromosomes just before the inactivation of one.

Pairing required only the gene sequences of two of the silencing RNAs. Addition of either of these sequences to an autosome drew X chromosomes away from each other and into autosomal pairings. Deletion of the sequences from the X chromosome also interfered with pairing and resulted in none, one, or both X chromosomes being inactivated.

The big next step for the field will be to identify the molecules behind this choice. Thinking on a larger scale, Lee imagines that other epigenetic events might also be preceded by transient chromosomal pairings. In support of this idea, close proximity in late S phase of the two copies of an imprinted locus has been reported.

Reference:

Xu, N., et al. 2006. Science. doi:10.1126/science.1122984[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Nicole LeBrasseur

lebrasn{at}rockefeller.edu

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This Article PPT slides of all figures Alert me when this article is cited Services Email this article Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new content in the JCB Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via CrossRef Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by LeBrasseur, N. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by LeBrasseur, N. Social Bookmarking                      What's this?