JCB logo
amgmicro.com
  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents

Published online 6 February 2006. doi:10.1083/jcb1724rr2
The Rockefeller University Press, 0021-9525 $8.00
JCB, Volume 172, Number 4, 483-483
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Services
Right arrow Email this article
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new content in the JCB
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by LeBrasseur, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by LeBrasseur, N.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Research Roundup

APC's order of business


The anaphase-promoting complex (APC) has a hectic schedule. From mitosis through the G1/S transition, the APC is busily targeting cell cycle regulators for degradation. Yet it must keep an ordered degradation schedule for proper cell cycle progression. Now, results from Michael Rape, Sashank Reddy, and Marc Kirschner (Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA) suggest that the APC lets its substrates determine their own death order.

The degradation order of cell cycle regulators correlates with the kinetics of their ubiquitination by the APC. In vitro, securin—one of the first of the APC's substrates to be degraded—rapidly obtained full-length polyubiquitin chains, which are required for proteasome recognition. The late-degraded substrates took much longer for multiubiquitination.

The kinetics reflects differences in substrate processivity—that is, how many ubiquitins are added in a single APC binding event. The most processive substrate outcompeted the rest in vitro for polyubiquitination and thus degradation.

"Why do we need so many ubiquitins in the first place?" asks Kirschner. "Isn't it overboard?" Not according to the group's new results. "We argue that by having multiple steps, chances for things to come off, you could accentuate very small differences in kinetic processes."

Differences are probably further compounded by deubiquitinating enzymes. Nonprocessive substrates easily lost ubiquitin moieties upon dissociation from the APC.Formula

Reference:

Rape, M., et al. 2006. Cell. 124:89–103.[CrossRef][Medline]



Nicole LeBrasseur

lebrasn{at}rockefeller.edu


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Services
Right arrow Email this article
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new content in the JCB
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by LeBrasseur, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by LeBrasseur, N.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?


  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents