JCB logo
CrossRef
  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents

Published online 6 March 2006. doi:10.1083/jcb.1726rr3
The Rockefeller University Press, 0021-9525 $8.00
JCB, Volume 172, Number 6, 787-787
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF, 892K)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Services
Right arrow Email this article
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new content in the JCB
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Powell, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Powell, K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Research Roundup

Virus diverts checkpoint


Human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) inactivates a DNA damage response by booting two checkpoint proteins out of the nucleus, according to Miguel Gaspar and Thomas Shenk (Princeton University, Princeton, NJ).

When DNA herpesviruses like HCMV replicate, the double-stranded ends of their genomes, which resemble breaks, can trigger a cell's DNA damage checkpoint pathway. Viruses have evolved several mechanisms to inactivate the checkpoint and proceed with replication, such as degrading an essential checkpoint component or using the block in cell cycle progression to their advantage.

Gaspar and Shenk now show that HCMV thwarts the checkpoint in a novel way—by trapping two essential checkpoint proteins, ATM and Chk2, in the cytoplasm. "This is the first time a virus has been found to antagonize a DNA damage checkpoint by mislocalization," notes Shenk.

The checkpoint proteins wind up hanging out with viral proteins in the cytoplasmic "virion assembly zone." Whether ATM and Chk2 get ferried out of the nucleus by the viral proteins or another viral protein blocks the checkpoint proteins' normal nuclear import remains to be answered.

Shenk says the HCMV studies could shed light on the poorly defined nuclear import mechanism—following his motto: "If a virus goes after it, it's probably important."Formula

Reference:

Gaspar, M., and T. Shenk. 2006. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. doi:10.1073/pnas.0511148103.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



Kendall Powell

kendall2{at}nasw.org


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF, 892K)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Services
Right arrow Email this article
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new content in the JCB
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Powell, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Powell, K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?


  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents