JCB logo
  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents

Published online 20 March 2006. doi:10.1083/jcb.1727rr5
The Rockefeller University Press, 0021-9525 $8.00
JCB, Volume 172, Number 7, 959-959
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF, 1137K)
Right arrow PPT slides of all figures
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Services
Right arrow Email this article
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new content in the JCB
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wells, W. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Wells, W. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Research Roundup

Kinetochore to order



Figure 1
Overproduced CENP-A (green) induces an ectopic kinetochore (blue) with attached microtubule (red).

KARPEN/ELSEVIER

Extra functional kinetochores can be created by overexpressing just a single protein, according to Patrick Heun, Sylvia Erhardt, Gary Karpen (University of California, Berkeley, CA), and colleagues.

The protein, called CENP-A or, in flies, CID, makes sense as an initial foundation stone for kinetochores. It substitutes for histone H3 and thus, of all kinetochore proteins, gets closest to the DNA. Human tissue culture cells overexpressing CENP-A did not make extra kinetochores, possibly because of a shortage of other factors. But in fly cells the extra CENP-A incorporated into ectopic chromosomal sites and, at some of those sites, recruited inner and outer kinetochore proteins, and motor proteins. Microtubule connections at these sites appeared to be exerting force on the chromosomes and caused chromosome breaks and aneuploidy.

Additional factors may be needed to help define kinetochore identity, but "this tells us we are on the right track," says Karpen. He says evolution may have tolerated the occasional creation of new kinetochores because acentric products of chromosome rearrangments need a way to be rescued.

Karpen hopes to find sequences or histone modification patterns that favor either ectopic CENP-A incorporation or recruitment of other kinetochore proteins to these sites. The second challenge will be to find a loading factor specific for CENP-A, in the hope of localizing this factor and thus inducing kinetochore formation at a specific site.Formula

Reference:

Heun, P., et al. 2006. Dev. Cell. 10:303–315.[CrossRef][Medline]



William A. Wells

wellsw{at}rockefeller.edu


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF, 1137K)
Right arrow PPT slides of all figures
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Services
Right arrow Email this article
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new content in the JCB
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wells, W. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Wells, W. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?


  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents