JCB logo
  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents

Published online 1 May 2006. doi:10.1083/jcb.1733rr1
The Rockefeller University Press, 0021-9525 $8.00
JCB, Volume 173, Number 3, 317-317
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF, 1542K)
Right arrow PPT slides of all figures
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Services
Right arrow Email this article
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new content in the JCB
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by LeBrasseur, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by LeBrasseur, N.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Research Roundup

Migrating interphase DNA



Figure 1
An interphase locus (white) moves from the periphery to the center (top to bottom) upon transcription factor binding.

BELMONT/ELSEVIER

Chien-Hui Chuang (University of Illinois, Urbana, IL) sees chromosomes moving long distances—and not during mitosis. Chuang, Andrew Belmont, and colleagues, now unveil the inducible long-range migration of an interphase chromosome site.

An hour or two after mitosis, chromosomes appear to be locked down, as only short-range, tethered diffusion-like movements had been seen during interphase. Yet several groups had noted that certain genes localize at the nuclear periphery when repressed but in the interior when active.

Chuang and colleagues visualized the movements accompanying this repositioning. They used an engineered locus that they could turn on through inducible targeting of a transcriptional activator. Upon transcription factor targeting, the group observed rapid, directed movements of the locus from the nuclear envelope toward the interior. The linear paths taken, often approximately perpendicular to the envelope, discount simple diffusion. During this motion, the locus moved at speeds approaching anaphase chromosome separation.

Although the existence of a nuclear actin network is still controversial, the group found a dependence of this long-range motion on actin and myosin. If the DNA is indeed transported on actin filaments, the preferential inward movements suggest that the intranuclear actin network is polarized. The authors are now testing whether the locus returns as directly to the periphery when the transcriptional activator is removed. Formula

Reference:

Chuang, C.-H., et al. 2006. Curr. Biol. 16:825–831.[CrossRef][Medline]



Nicole LeBrasseur

lebrasn{at}rockefeller.edu


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF, 1542K)
Right arrow PPT slides of all figures
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Services
Right arrow Email this article
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new content in the JCB
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by LeBrasseur, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by LeBrasseur, N.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?


  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents