JCB logo
amgmicro.com
  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents

Published online 1 May 2006. doi:10.1083/jcb.1733rr2
The Rockefeller University Press, 0021-9525 $8.00
JCB, Volume 173, Number 3, 317-317
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF, 1542K)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Services
Right arrow Email this article
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new content in the JCB
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by LeBrasseur, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by LeBrasseur, N.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Research Roundup

Two ways for insertion


When inserting surface receptors into the somatodendritic plasma membrane, neurons have a choice. Their decision determines how long receptors linger at the point of insertion, as shown by Guillermo Yudowski, Manojkumar Puthenveedu, and Mark von Zastrow (University of California, San Francisco, CA).

The number of receptors in the plasma membrane largely determines neuronal sensitivity to signaling molecules. Although the removal of activated receptors has been widely studied, their replacement has been a less popular topic. "Historically, most people thought of it as simply a bulk-flow process," says van Zastrow. "The bias in the field, and one that I held, honestly, is that insertion processes would be unregulated."

The UCSF group has now, however, identified two distinct types of insertion events—both regulated. In the predominant type, GFP-tagged ß2 adrenergic receptors (ß2ARs) moved laterally away from the insertion site almost immediately. In the second, the receptors were temporarily stuck at the insertion site for an average of 30 seconds before diffusing away suddenly. Neither resembled axonal "kiss-and-run" exocytic events, in which cargo is deposited but then immediately removed.

The two somatodendritic insertion types were oppositely affected by ß2AR activation. Transient insertion events (those that diffuse immediately) were inhibited by a PKA-dependent pathway, whereas persistent insertion events increased. Fewer transient insertions probably dampen overall signaling; the increase in persistent events might favor a different signaling cascade, particularly if they represent clustered receptors. Formula

Reference:

Yudowski, G.A., et al. 2006. Nat. Neurosci. doi:10.1038/nn1679.



Nicole LeBrasseur

lebrasn{at}rockefeller.edu


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF, 1542K)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Services
Right arrow Email this article
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new content in the JCB
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by LeBrasseur, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by LeBrasseur, N.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?


  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents