JCB logo
  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents

Published online 30 May 2006. doi:10.1083/jcb.1735rr3
The Rockefeller University Press, 0021-9525 $8.00
JCB, Volume 173, Number 5, 643-643
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF, 885K)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Services
Right arrow Email this article
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new content in the JCB
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Katsnelson, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Katsnelson, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Research Roundup

Genome punctuation


The DNA replication process recognizes transcription regulatory elements as punctuation marks at the start and end of genes, according to new research by Ekaterina V. Mirkin, Sergei M. Mirkin (University of Illinois, Chicago), and colleagues.

Because transcription and replication often occur concurrently and share a template, they occasionally collide. Sergei Mirkin and colleagues previously saw that the Escherichia coli replication fork slowed considerably during collisions with the moving RNA polymerase. The group now shows that replication also slows down upon colliding with a motionless RNA polymerase.

The stall occurs either just before or just after the coding frame, depending on the direction of the collision. Replication forks coming from the gene's tail end paused at the promoter. When the transcription cassette was flipped to coorient transcription and replication, the fork paused at the terminator instead.

The fork's pause signals are the transcription initiation and termination complexes, depending on the direction. "This polarity," says Mirkin, "assures the replication fork pauses immediately after it passes the coding region, no matter which direction it came from."

Mirkin suggests that these pauses might be a window of opportunity to correct mistakes in the newly replicated DNA. "Imagine a mark for the replication fork that says, ‘Look, you just finished copying a very important part of the text. Now slow down and check your work.’" Formula

Reference:

Mirkin, E.V., et al. 2006. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 103:7276–7281.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



Alla Katsnelson

akatsnelson{at}fastmail.fm


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF, 885K)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Services
Right arrow Email this article
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new content in the JCB
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Katsnelson, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Katsnelson, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?


  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents