JCB logo
amgmicro.com
  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents

Published online 30 May 2006. doi:10.1083/jcb.1735rr5
The Rockefeller University Press, 0021-9525 $8.00
JCB, Volume 173, Number 5, 643-643
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF, 885K)
Right arrow PPT slides of all figures
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Services
Right arrow Email this article
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new content in the JCB
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Katsnelson, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Katsnelson, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Research Roundup

ES cells clean house



Figure 1
Undifferentiated cells in the inner cell mass (green) contain proteins damaged by carbonylation (red).

NYSTRÖM/NAS

Malin Hernebring, Thomas Nyström (Göteborg University, Göteborg, Sweden), and colleagues find that mouse embryonic stem (ES) cells do some spring cleaning during differentiation to rid themselves of protein damage.

Protein damage is absent in young tissue but accumulates with age. The authors wondered what prevents run-down proteins from being passed via the germline to a newly developing organism.

To address this issue, the researchers measured carbonylation and advanced glycation end product (AGE) formation—two common types of protein damage—in cultured undifferentiated ES cells. "What's been assumed," says Nyström, "is that the [ES] cells would be miraculously kept free of protein damage." But the group was surprised to find levels of these contamination products equivalent to those found in a middle-aged mouse.

After cultured ES cells differentiated, levels of both damage markers dropped dramatically. In blastocysts, too, proliferating cells of the inner cell mass showed damage, but differentiated cells on the outer surface did not.

The elimination of protein damage was accompanied by a threefold increase in the activity of the 20S proteasome, which was previously implicated in degrading oxidative stress products. Nyström posits that this process cleanses the cellular protein slate. The team is now examining how the proteasome's activity is regulated. Formula

Reference:

Hernebring, M., et al. 2006. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. doi:10.1073/pnas.0510944103.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



Alla Katsnelson

akatsnelson{at}fastmail.fm


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF, 885K)
Right arrow PPT slides of all figures
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Services
Right arrow Email this article
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new content in the JCB
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Katsnelson, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Katsnelson, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?


  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents