Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents

This Article Full Text (PDF, 883K) PPT slides of all figures Alert me when this article is cited Services Email this article Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new content in the JCB Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via CrossRef Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by LeBrasseur, N. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by LeBrasseur, N. Social Bookmarking                            What's this?

Disorder for variety

Highly disordered regions are more common in alternatively spliced regions (left) than the rest of the protein (right). DUNKER/NAS

Disordered regions in proteins are prime real estate for alternative splicing, say Pedro Romero, Keith Dunker (Indiana University-Purdue University, Indianapolis, IN), and colleagues find that d. The innate disorder allows protein variation that in turn increases functional diversity.

Both splicing and disorder are more common in multicellular eukaryotes than in lower organisms. Dunker wondered whether this trend might be more than coincidence. Structures are available for only five pairs of alternatively spliced isoforms but, in three pairs, the regions present in one splice form but absent in another are found within disordered regions.

To expand the dataset, the authors compared various databases of disorder and of splicing. Indeed, alternatively spliced regions were strongly biased toward disorder. Their flexibility probably improves the odds that an addition or deletion will not impede folding and thus lead to aggregates.

Splicing in disordered regions might also increase functional diversity. Unlike structured domains, which use far-flung residues to build a single functional unit, disordered regions often use a compact and linear series of residues to create a particular functional unit. "You get more bang for your buck," says Dunker. "Just splice out ten consecutive residues, and a whole function is gone."

Disordered domains can evolve quickly, given their structural freedom, and often bind several partners. As disordered regions are commonly signaling and regulatory domains, more disorder and more splicing might have contributed to the emergence of cellular specialization. "With different splicing in different cells," says Dunker, "the signaling network becomes radically altered." Splicing out a piece of a disordered region in BRCA1, for example, eliminates p53 binding.

Testing this evolutionary hypothesis, however, will take time. To start, the group would like to work out the major signaling network differences between a pair of similar but distinct cell types, perhaps from a simple multicellular organism like the sponge, and then determine whether the changes relate to alternative splicing within disordered regions.

Reference:

Romero, P.R., et al. 2006. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 103:8390–8395.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Nicole LeBrasseur

lebrasn{at}rockefeller.edu

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Facebook    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This Article Full Text (PDF, 883K) PPT slides of all figures Alert me when this article is cited Services Email this article Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new content in the JCB Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via CrossRef Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by LeBrasseur, N. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by LeBrasseur, N. Social Bookmarking                            What's this?