JCB logo
Accuri Cytometers
  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents

Published online 24 July 2006. doi:10.1083/jcb.1743iti2
The Rockefeller University Press, 0021-9525 $8.00
JCB, Volume 174, Number 3, 319-319
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF, 1176K)
Right arrow PPT slides of all figures
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Services
Right arrow Email this article
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new content in the JCB
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tuma, R. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Tuma, R. S.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

In This Issue

Mannose receptor regulates motility



Figure 1
Myoblasts fail to fuse if they lack the mannose receptor (bottom).

If myoblasts are to fuse with nascent myotubes and thus form muscles, they must apparently migrate and chew up extracellular matrix (ECM), according to Jansen and Pavlath (page 403). These activities require expression of the mannose receptor (MR) in differentiating myoblasts.

The pathway is induced when nascent myotubes secrete IL-4, which induced expression of the MR in myoblasts. Although MR-null myoblasts fused normally with other myoblasts, they were retarded in their ability to fuse with nascent myotubes, which is the second stage of myotube formation.

MR expression appears to be required in vivo as well as in vitro for normal myotube formation, as the myofibers in MR-null mice were smaller than those in wild-type animals.

The researchers found that MR-null myoblasts migrated more slowly than wild-type cells in response to chemotactic stimuli. Moreover, the mutant cells internalized less collagen than control cells, indicating that MR, which is an endocytic receptor, is required for efficient clearance of the ECM during cell movement.

Jansen and Pavlath note that MR activity is required for other cell fusion events, but its role in migration and ECM remodeling has not been reported previously. Another member of the MR family, Endo180, is also involved in cell migration and ECM clearance. Therefore, these activities might be a common function for the receptor family. Formula



Rabiya S. Tuma

rabiya{at}nasw.org


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?

Related Article

Mannose receptor regulates myoblast motility and muscle growth
Katie M. Jansen and Grace K. Pavlath
J. Cell Biol. 2006 174: 403-413. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF, 1176K)
Right arrow PPT slides of all figures
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Services
Right arrow Email this article
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new content in the JCB
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tuma, R. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Tuma, R. S.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?


  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents