JCB logo
  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents

Published online 24 July 2006. doi:10.1083/jcb.1743rr1
The Rockefeller University Press, 0021-9525 $8.00
JCB, Volume 174, Number 3, 321-321
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF, 1373K)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Services
Right arrow Email this article
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new content in the JCB
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Williams, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Williams, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Research Roundup

Positioning proteasomes


Activity produces waste, so it makes sense to position waste disposal facilities close to sites of activity. Baris Bingol and Erin Schuman (California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA) have discovered that neurons do just that, recruiting proteasomes to active dendritic spines.

Dendritic spines must construct and destroy many proteins as they respond to synaptic excitation. Protein synthesis machinery has been shown to sit locally in spines to make protein when needed. Indication that the degradation machinery (proteasomes) might also serve its function locally came from Bingol's discovery that adjacent synapses in the same neuron contained different amounts of proteasome.

Investigating the dynamics of this varied distribution, the team observed that excitation of neurons drove proteasomes from the shafts to the spines within minutes. Proteasome levels then remained high in the spines for up to an hour. Ubiquitinated proteins, targeted for destruction, also initially increased, but shortly thereafter decreased as the proteasomes arrived and got to work. Thus, the study shows that proteasomes are dynamic machines that are capable of moving toward their targets.

The increase in spine proteasome levels was due partly to recruitment and mostly to sequestration, and excitation led to an increased association of proteasomes with the actin cytoskeleton, suggesting a possible mechanism for activity-dependent localization. Investigating the molecular mechanics of actin binding would be the sensible next step, says Bingol. Formula

Reference:

Bingol, B., and M.E. Schuman. 2006. Nature. doi:10.1038/nature04769.



Ruth Williams

ruth.williams{at}rockefeller.edu


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF, 1373K)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Services
Right arrow Email this article
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new content in the JCB
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Williams, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Williams, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?


  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents