JCB logo
amgmicro.com
  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents

Published online 5 September 2006. doi:10.1083/jcb.1746rr2
The Rockefeller University Press, 0021-9525 $8.00
JCB, Volume 174, Number 6, 739-739
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF, 738K)
Right arrow PPT slides of all figures
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Services
Right arrow Email this article
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new content in the JCB
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Williams, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Williams, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Research Roundup

Microtubule munching



Figure 1
Kip3p (green) binds to microtubules (red) and motors along to their plus ends (right).

HOWARD/MACMILLAN

A yeast kinesin rapidly munches long microtubules, but its munching speed slows as the microtubules get shorter, report Vladimir Varga, Jonathon Howard, and colleagues (Max Planck Institute, Dresden, Germany). Along with Mohan Gupta, David Pellman, and colleagues (Harvard, Boston, MA), the team also shows that this kinesin-8, called Kip3p, paradoxically eats away at the growing ends of microtubules.

Microtubule length must be tightly controlled for cell functions as diverse as transport, motility, and division. In vitro studies by both groups showed that Kip3p binds all along the length of microtubules, but then motors along to accumulate at their plus ends, where it functions as a depolymerase.

Varga et al. found that Kip3p had a bigger appetite for longer microtubules, as these were devoured more rapidly than short microtubules. The authors suggest that longer microtubules bind more Kip3p and thus accumulate more depolymerase at their plus ends. The ends probably lose some Kip3p as they shorten, and shorter microtubules have less room to pick up more of the motor.

Plus-end accumulation of Kip3p was seen both in vitro and in cells. In the cell, however, the plus end is where growth and shrinkage occur. "The plus end is the place where the action is happening," says Varga. At this end, he says, there is probably, "a fight between polymerization and destabilizing proteins." He suggests that microtubules might grow from their plus ends until enough Kip3p accumulates to swing the battle in favor of shortening. Formula

References:

Varga, V., et al. 2006. Nat. Cell Biol. doi:10.1038/ncb1462.

Gupta, M.L., et al. 2006. Nat. Cell Biol. doi:10.1038/ncb1457.



Ruth Williams

ruth.williams{at}rockefeller.edu


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF, 738K)
Right arrow PPT slides of all figures
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Services
Right arrow Email this article
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new content in the JCB
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Williams, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Williams, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?


  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents