JCB logo
Avanti Polar Lipids, Inc.
  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents

Published 23 October 2006. doi:10.1083/jcb.1752iti2
The Rockefeller University Press, 0021-9525 $8.00
JCB, Volume 175, Number 2, 195-195
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF, 1670K)
Right arrow PPT slides of all figures
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Services
Right arrow Email this article
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new content in the JCB
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Leslie, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Leslie, M.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

In This Issue

Getting the embryo into shape



Figure 1
Gaps in the body wall (arrows) form in an embryo lacking MyoD-producing epiblast cells.

Some stem cells in the embryo have the same effect as a personal trainer, show Gerhart et al. on page 283. Although they are candidates for forming muscle cells themselves, they instead coax others to build the muscle. Muscle-promoting cells might thus emerge earlier in development than many researchers thought.

When a chick embryo is only a two-layered disk, the upper layer called the epiblast already houses a few cells that have turned on the gene for MyoD, one of the supervisors for muscle development. But the cells also manufacture another muscle stimulator, known as Noggin. In the culture dish, these cells prod unprogrammed cells to form muscle.

To investigate the cells' function in bulking up the embryo, Gerhart et al. tracked them with antibodies. Most of the MyoD producers ended up in the somites that give rise to muscle throughout the body. The researchers then destroyed the MyoD cells in the epiblast and followed the developmental consequences. The loss reduced the amount of skeletal muscle, weakening the trunk muscles so much that organs bulged through the body wall.

Implanting beads saturated with Noggin into the embryos corrected most defects. Noggin's restorative ability indicates that the MyoD-carrying cells exert their impact mainly by spurring other cells to form muscle. The researchers plan to determine whether these influential muscle progenitors have other functions during embryonic development. Formula



Mitch Leslie

mitchleslie{at}comcast.net


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?

Related Article

MyoD-positive epiblast cells regulate skeletal muscle differentiation in the embryo
Jacquelyn Gerhart, Justin Elder, Christine Neely, Jared Schure, Tage Kvist, Karen Knudsen, and Mindy George-Weinstein
J. Cell Biol. 2006 175: 283-292. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF, 1670K)
Right arrow PPT slides of all figures
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Services
Right arrow Email this article
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new content in the JCB
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Leslie, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Leslie, M.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?


  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents