JCB logo
PeproTech: Cell Culture Supplements
  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents

Published online
doi:10.1083/jcb.1771iti5
The Journal of Cell Biology, Vol. 177, No. 1, 2-
The Rockefeller University Press, 0021-9525 $30.00
© LeBrasseur
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF, 875K)
Right arrow PPT slides of all figures
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Services
Right arrow Email this article
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new content in the JCB
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by LeBrasseur, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by LeBrasseur, N.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

In This Issue

Females' regenerating advantage



Figure 1
Female muscle-derived stem cells make more skeletal muscle cells (red) than do their male counterparts.

Men might build more muscle, but women are better at keeping what they have, if results from Deasy et al. (page 73) are any indication. The group shows that female muscle stem cells are better than their male counterparts at regenerating lost muscle.

The authors were led into the realm of muscle and sex when they realized that they were relying heavily on cell lines derived from female mice to study muscle regeneration. Most of the male lines, by contrast, were stuck away in the freezer. They supposed that the female ones were more popular because they were working better.

The group now shows that female muscle stem cells are indeed better at regenerating diseased muscle in a mouse model. While the male cells proliferated briefly and abruptly differentiated into muscle, the female cells held out. They proliferated more slowly at first, but cycled longer before becoming muscle. By multiplying first, the stem cells can eventually create more fibers.

The female cells also seem better equipped to deal with the hypoxic conditions and reactive oxygen species found in injured and diseased muscle, as they up-regulated more stress-related and antiapoptotic genes. Artificially turning on antiapoptotic Bcl-2 in male stem cells was not enough to improve their regeneration, however.

Hormones may also have some influence, as females were better recipients as well as donors. But estrogen treatments did not prod stem cells of either sex to make muscle more efficiently.

The authors still need to determine the ultimate cause of the female cells' superior regenerating ability. Perhaps a Y chromosome gene encourages quick differentiation. Whatever the cause, biologists should make sure to note cell sex when describing their experimental methods with stem cells of any sort. Formula



Nicole LeBrasseur

lebrasn{at}rockefeller.edu


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?

Related Article

A role for cell sex in stem cell–mediated skeletal muscle regeneration: female cells have higher muscle regeneration efficiency
Bridget M. Deasy, Aiping Lu, Jessica C. Tebbets, Joseph M. Feduska, Rebecca C. Schugar, Jonathan B. Pollett, Bin Sun, Kenneth L. Urish, Burhan M. Gharaibeh, Baohong Cao, Robert T. Rubin, and Johnny Huard
J. Cell Biol. 2007 177: 73-86. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF, 875K)
Right arrow PPT slides of all figures
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Services
Right arrow Email this article
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new content in the JCB
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by LeBrasseur, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by LeBrasseur, N.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?


  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents