Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents

This Article Full Text (PDF, 764K) PPT slides of all figures Alert me when this article is cited Services Email this article Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new content in the JCB Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via CrossRef Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by LeBrasseur, N. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by LeBrasseur, N. Social Bookmarking                            What's this?

The pore slides open

Nup58/45 conformations suggest that its tetramerization interface can slide apart (black arrows). Only one of the two N-helical pairs that generate this interface is shown. BLOBEL/AAAS

Structures of a nuclear pore protein, presented by Ivo Melák, André Hoelz, and Günter Blobel (Rockefeller University, New York, NY), suggest that the pore's central channel expands by an unusual sliding between hydrophilic residues.

The crystals reveal structures of one of the four nucleoporins that make up the main channel. The authors suggest that the pore is encircled by eight side-by-side tetramers of this nucleoporin, called Nup58/45. The tetramer came in two forms; in one, the dimer–dimer interface was laterally displaced by 6 Å compared with the other.

Most protein interfaces depend on hydrophobic residues. But in Nup58/45, an electrostatic dimer–dimer interface permits expansion by allowing alternative hydrogen bond pairings. Hoelz describes this interaction as "the opposite of a leucine zipper." Intermediate steps that resemble sliding-like movements are probable.

Because each structure was equally abundant in the crystals, the authors propose that little energy is required to switch between the states. Perhaps only the binding of the cargo complex is needed.

If each tetramer is at full extension, the pore diameter might widen by 30 Å, probably during the export of large cargo such as preribosomal subunits. Perhaps the other core pore proteins have similar sliding mechanisms. How accessory proteins alter the situation will be studied for years to come. "There are so many proteins involved," says Hoelz. "I think that the nuclear pore complex will be full of surprises like [this one]."

Reference:

Melák, I., et al. 2007. Science. 315:1729–1732.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Nicole LeBrasseur

lebrasn{at}rockefeller.edu

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Facebook    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This Article Full Text (PDF, 764K) PPT slides of all figures Alert me when this article is cited Services Email this article Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new content in the JCB Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via CrossRef Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by LeBrasseur, N. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by LeBrasseur, N. Social Bookmarking                            What's this?