JCB logo
CrossRef
  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents

Published online
doi:10.1083/jcb.1784rr3
The Journal of Cell Biology, Vol. 178, No. 4, 545-
The Rockefeller University Press, 0021-9525 $30.00
© Powell
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF, 776K)
Right arrow PPT slides of all figures
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Services
Right arrow Email this article
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new content in the JCB
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Powell, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Powell, K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Research Roundup

Collective guidance wisdom



Figure 1
A border cell cluster (red, blue) follows the leading cell (green) containing the most guidance signal.

RØRTH

Traditionally, cell migration studies focus on the responses of a single cell to guidance signals, but migrations during development and metastasis involve traveling clumps of cells. Pernille Rørth and colleagues (EMBL, Heidelberg, Germany) now show that a collective consciousness can direct the migration of cell clusters.

The team tracked two distinct migration phases—a quick start and a later, slower phase—by the border cell cluster in developing fly egg chambers. They found that the phases required different growth factor–induced signaling pathways; only the latter was controlled by MAPK and PLC{gamma}.

While early signals were restricted to the front of the cluster's leader, the later MAPK signal was uniform throughout leading cells. How this signal could direct movement puzzled the group until they considered that the cluster might be guided as a unit. Movies revealed that, in the late phase, the cluster slowed to a tumbling, shuffling motion in which the leading cell or two—ones with the most MAPK signaling—often changed identity.

The shuffling means that cells are constantly in competition for who is "seeing" growth factor best at any given moment by being closest to the ligand source and sensing it best. This group mentality, which can assess a larger environment than individual cells, may boost migration precision.Formula

Reference:

Bianco, A., et al. 2007. Nature. 448:362–365.[CrossRef][Medline]



Kendall Powell

kendall2{at}nasw.org


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF, 776K)
Right arrow PPT slides of all figures
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Services
Right arrow Email this article
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new content in the JCB
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Powell, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Powell, K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?


  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents