|
||
Article |
Correspondence to Mark H. Ginsberg: mhginsberg{at}ucsd.edu
Integrin-dependent assembly of the fibronectin (Fn) matrix plays a central role in vertebrate development. We identify CD98hc, a membrane protein, as an important component of the matrix assembly machinery both in vitro and in vivo. CD98hc was not required for biosynthesis of cellular Fn or the maintenance of the repertoire or affinity of cellular Fn binding integrins, which are important contributors to Fn assembly. Instead, CD98hc was involved in the cell's ability to exert force on the matrix and did so by dint of its capacity to interact with integrins to support downstream signals that lead to activation of RhoA small GTPase. Thus, we identify CD98hc as a membrane protein that enables matrix assembly and establish that it functions by interacting with integrins to support RhoA-driven contractility. CD98hc expression can vary widely; our data show that these variations in CD98hc expression can control the capacity of cells to assemble an Fn matrix, a process important in development, wound healing, and tumorigenesis.
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Pioneering studies (McKeown-Longo and Mosher, 1983, 1985; Schwarzbauer, 1991; Sottile and Mosher, 1993; Sechler et al., 1996, 2001) have defined the regions of Fn important in the assembly process. The N-terminal 70-kD domain of Fn plays a pivotal role in matrix assembly. It does so by interacting with several other sites within the Fn molecule. These sites, which are generally contained within the type III repeats, are cryptic in soluble Fn and exposed as a consequence of conformational changes in Fn (Wierzbicka-Patynowski and Schwarzbauer, 2003). These conformational changes may involve extension of the Fn or unfolding of particular repeats. Studies from several laboratories show that Fn conformation can be changed by mechanical deformation (Zhong et al., 1998; Krammer et al., 1999; Erickson, 1994, 2002; Ohashi et al., 2002). Indeed, the hypothesis that matrix assembly site exposure is initiated by integrin-dependent mechanical deformation of Fn (Wu et al., 1995c) has been experimentally validated (Zhong et al., 1998). Thus, the assembly of an Fn matrix results from Fn–Fn interactions initiated by mechanical deformation of the Fn molecule.
The binding of Fn to integrins, such as
5ß1, initiates the matrix assembly process (Corbett and Schwarzbauer, 1999; Mao and Schwarzbauer, 2005). In particular, forces generated by the cytoskeleton and conveyed to Fn via integrins cause deformation of the Fn molecule (Zhong et al., 1998). For assembly to begin, these integrins must (1) physically associate with Fn, usually by binding it with high affinity (operationally defined as an "activated" integrin; Wu et al., 1995c), and (2) physically associate with the cytoskeleton (Wu et al., 1995c). Several signaling enzymes, including Src family kinases, pp125FAK, Rho GTPases, and PI3 kinase, are also involved in the matrix assembly process (Wierzbicka-Patynowski and Schwarzbauer, 2002). These same signaling enzymes can be regulated by integrin ligation in a process referred to as outside-in integrin signaling (Boudreau and Jones, 1999; Arias-Salgado et al., 2005; Shattil, 2005). Thus, it is possible that integrin signals that regulate kinases such as pp125FAK could participate in the assembly process.
We recently found that CD98hc, a type II transmembrane protein, mediates outside-in integrin signaling (Féral et al., 2005). CD98hc has two distinct functions: (1) it can associate with and regulate the function of selected integrins and (2) it can regulate the expression and distribution of CD98 light chains to modulate amino acid transport function. Each function depends on distinct domains within CD98hc, with the intracellular portion being required for interaction with integrins (Fenczik et al., 2001). Deletion of CD98hc in embryonic stem (ES) cells impaired the formation of teratocarcinomas in vivo and many integrin-dependent functions in vitro because CD98hc is a contributor to integrin-dependent biochemical signals (Féral et al., 2005). The role of CD98hc in integrin signaling suggested that it might participate in the Fn matrix assembly process. Here, we report that CD98hc is required for efficient Fn matrix assembly both in vitro and in vivo. Furthermore, deletion of CD98hc has little effect on Fn biosynthesis or integrin activation; instead, lack of CD98hc impairs outside-in integrin signals that result in RhoA-mediated cellular contractility necessary for Fn matrix assembly. Finally, the portion of CD98hc that interacts with integrins is necessary and sufficient to support cellular contractility and Fn matrix assembly. Thus, we find that CD98hc participates in Fn matrix assembly by mediating the outside-in integrin signals required for the contractile events that initiate and sustain Fn matrix assembly.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
-smooth muscle actin and platelet/endothelial cell adhesion molecule 1 (PECAM-1), respectively (Fig. 1 C). In the CD98hc-null tumors, endothelial cells were present but failed to form intact blood vessels (Fig. 1 B) or to invest with
-smooth muscle actin–expressing cells (Fig. 1 C). Instead of associating with endothelial cells,
-smooth muscle actin–expressing cells were dispersed throughout the tumors. In sharp contrast, WT tumors exhibited an organized network of blood vessels, including larger vessels with an endothelial lining and smooth muscle cell–containing intima and media (Fig. 1, B and C). Thus, the absence of CD98hc impairs Fn matrix deposition and vascular development, a process known to depend on Fn.
Lack of CD98hc impairs Fn matrix assembly in vitro
To learn whether CD98hc deficiency by itself leads directly to defective cellular Fn matrix formation and to understand the mechanisms by which CD98hc supports Fn matrix formation, we developed conditional CD98hc-null mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs; Fig. 2, A and B).
CD98hc conditional–null mice were generated as described in Materials and methods. We deleted CD98hc in vitro by infecting these cells with adenoviruses expressing Cre recombinase, resulting in 95% excision of exons 1 and 2 of CD98hc (Fig. 2 B). These cells were then mass sorted with immunomagnetic beads to select fibroblasts lacking detectable CD98hc (Fig. 2 C). Importantly, the CD98hc-null fibroblasts and parental WT cells expressed similar quantities of integrins
5, ß1,
6, and
v, as judged by flow cytometry (Fig. 2 C) and showed defects in integrin signaling similar to those seen in CD98hc-null fibroblasts derived from ES cells (Fig. S1, available at http://www.jcb.org/cgi/content/full/jcb.200705090/DC1). None of the cells expressed a detectable amount of
1,
2,
4, or ß3 integrins. Thus, these conditional CD98hc MEFs provide a tool to analyze the effect of CD98hc deletion on Fn matrix formation and integrin signaling by fibroblasts.
|
|
|
5ß1,
IIbß3, or
Vß3 (Wu et al., 1995a,b; Sechler et al., 1997, 2000). To assess the effect of CD98hc deletion on the affinity of Fn binding integrins in these MEFs, we examined their binding to a recombinant-soluble cell binding domain of Fn, composed of type 3 repeats 9–11 (3Fn[9–11]). The absence of CD98hc had no effect on the ability of the cells to bind to 3Fn(F9–11), a direct measure of the affinity of Fn binding integrins, such as integrin
5ß1 (Chou et al., 2003). Importantly, when incubated with an activating anti–ß1 integrin antibody, 9EG7, there was a marked increase in 3Fn(9–11) binding to both the WT and the null cells (Fig. 4 C); however, this enforced activation of integrins did not rescue Fn assembly by the CD98hc-deficient cells (Fig. 4 D). Thus, the CD98hc-null cells' failure to assemble matrix is not due to a defect in their ability to synthesize or secrete Fn or to bind to soluble Fn with high affinity.
CD98hc mediates RhoA-driven traction forces on the extracellular matrix
Fn must be conformationally altered to initiate assembly into fibrils (Wierzbicka-Patynowski and Schwarzbauer, 2003). Once Fn binds to integrins, and the integrins connect to the cytoskeleton, RhoA-mediated cellular contractility exerts force on the Fn, leading to these conformational changes (Zhang et al., 1994; Zhong et al., 1998). We therefore examined the role of CD98hc in cellular contractility by assaying the contraction of an Fn-fibrin provisional matrix. Fibrin clots formed from blood plasma contain covalently cross-linked Fn that serves as a ligand for integrin
5ß1–dependent matrix contraction (Corbett and Schwarzbauer, 1999). Incorporation of WT MEFs in these matrices led to a 52 ± 0.8% contraction after 2 h (Fig. 5, A and B).
In contrast, contraction was markedly reduced when CD98hc-null cells were incorporated in the clot (24 ± 0.55% clot contraction). These cells lack ß3 integrins, suggesting that the contraction was mediated by Fn binding ß1 integrins, such as
5ß1. Indeed, clot retraction was strongly inhibited by a function-blocking anti–mouse ß1 antibody (clone Ha2/5; 18 ± 0.2 vs. 52 ± 0.8% clot contraction; unpublished data). Thus, CD98hc mediates the ß1 integrin–dependent contraction of an Fn-fibrin matrix.
|
The small GTP binding protein RhoA is a major regulator of cell contractility (Chrzanowska-Wodnicka and Burridge, 1996; Hall, 1998) that provides the traction forces to initiate Fn matrix assembly (Zhong et al., 1998). Matrix assembly within tissues occurs when cells are in contact with surrounding 3D extracellular matrix, leading us to examine the effect of CD98hc deletion on adhesion-mediated alterations in RhoA activity when cells interact with 3D matrix (Cukierman et al., 2001). 30 min after adhesion of WT MEFs to a 3D matrix, RhoA activity decreased, followed by a secondary increase as previously described (Ren et al., 1999). In sharp contrast, the CD98hc-null cells did not show this late increase in RhoA activity (Fig. 6 A). Strikingly, both CD98hc-null and WT MEFs exhibited similar increases in RhoA activity in response to lysophosphatidic acid (LPA), an agonist that activates RhoA via G protein–coupled receptors (van Corven et al., 1989; Fig. 6 B). Thus, CD98hc is required for RhoA activation in response to cell adhesion to a 3D Fn matrix.
|
The interaction of CD98hc with integrins mediates contraction of the extracellular matrix, thus regulating extracellular matrix assembly
The foregoing studies established that CD98hc participates in assembly of the Fn matrix by mediating adhesion-dependent RhoA activation that leads to traction on the extracellular matrix. Importantly, the CD98hc-null cells were able to activate RhoA in response to LPA, suggesting that matrix-driven RhoA activation is important in the assembly process. Integrins are the principal receptors that lead to matrix-initiated biochemical signals (Ingber, 1991; LaFlamme and Auer, 1996), and we previously found that the physical interaction of CD98hc with integrins is required for efficient integrin signaling (Féral et al., 2005). To examine the role of CD98hc–integrin interaction in matrix assembly, we reconstituted CD98hc-null MEFs with retroviruses encoding chimeras (Féral et al., 2005) formed between CD98hc and another type II transmembrane protein, CD69 (Fig. 7); each was well expressed as judged by flow cytometry (Fig. 7 B).
The C98T98E69 (cytoplasmic domain CD98hc, transmembrane domain CD98hc, and extracellular domain CD69) chimera interacts with integrins, whereas C69T98E98 and C98T69E98 do not associate with integrins. Only the integrin binding chimera (C98T98E69) rescued the defect in Fn matrix assembly (Fig. 7 A) and contractility (Fig. 7 C). CD98hc-deficient cells expressing the chimera that binds to integrins (C98T98E69) were able to induce a clot contraction (56 ± 1%) even more efficiently than WT cells (37 ± 0.8%). Thus, the capacity of CD98hc to mediate contraction of an Fn-fibrin clot depends on its ability to interact with integrins.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The variable expression of CD98hc and its contribution to Fn assembly have implications for the relationship between cell proliferation and formation of the extracellular matrix. CD98hc expression is tightly regulated coordinately with cell proliferation (Diaz et al., 1997), a pivotal event in wound healing, tumorigenesis, and development. Repair of skin wounds depends on precisely controlled formation of a fibrous extracellular matrix. The extracellular matrix deposition correlates with proliferation of fibroblasts and endothelial cells within the damaged area (Midwood et al., 2004). The dramatic up-regulation of CD98hc in proliferating cells could thus serve to promote Fn matrix assembly in healing wounds; conversely, a failure to down-regulate CD98hc could lead to excess matrix deposition and cell proliferation, as seen in fibrosis and keloid scars (Muir, 1990). Similarly, the marked up-regulation of CD98hc in tumors (Deves and Boyd, 2000) could contribute to enhanced formation of Fn extracellular matrix, thus altering the microenvironment of cells during tumorigenesis (Weaver et al., 1996; Lelievre et al., 1998; Schmeichel et al., 1998; Bissell et al., 2002; Weaver and Gilbert, 2004). Moreover, we show that CD98hc mediates cell contractility, an event strongly associated with progression of some tumors (Paszek et al., 2005). Finally, the deposition of Fn along the blastocoele roof is reported to be a critical step in gastrulation (Boucaut et al., 1985) and later for morphogenetic movements driven by convergent extension (Davidson et al., 2006). This spatiotemporally regulated matrix assembly is controlled by the activity of cellular integrins, as manifested by their ability to promote cell spreading (Ramos and DeSimone, 1996; Ramos et al., 1996), a CD98hc-dependent process (Féral et al., 2005). Thus, the importance of Fn matrix assembly in development and the role of CD98hc in matrix assembly shown here provide a cogent explanation for the early embryonic lethality of CD98hc gene disruption ( Tsumura et al., 2003) and suggest that changes in CD98hc expression, or its association with integrins, may influence a wide range of developmental processes through the regulation of Fn matrix assembly.
| Materials and methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Whole-mount lectin staining
Tumor samples were fixed in 10% formaldehyde for 30 min at room temperature, washed in 1x PBS containing 0.1 g/liter CaCl2, and cut into small (2 mm3) tissue blocks. The tissue blocks were then incubated in the calcium-containing PBS in the dark for 48 h at 4°C in the presence of 10 µg/ml isolectin GS-IB4 Alexa Flour 568 conjugate (Invitrogen). After washing, the stained tissues were analyzed using a laser-scanning confocal microscope (1024 MRC; Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.). Z-serial images were merged using Lasersharp software (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.) to obtain a 3D impression of the tumor samples.
Sequential immunohistofluorescence
4-µm tissue sections were deparaffinized and treated with methanol containing 0.3% H2O2 for 30 min at room temperature. Antigen retrieval and staining were performed using standard procedures. In brief, sections were first stained for
-smooth muscle actin using mouse anti–human
-smooth muscle actin antibody (clone 1A4; DakoCytomation) diluted at 1:50 in PBS containing 3% BSA and 0.01% Tween 20 for 60 min at room temperature. After washing, sections were incubated with secondary antibody goat anti– mouse Alexa 546 (Invitrogen) at 1:500 in PBS containing 0.01% Tween 20. Second, the TSA kit (PerkinElmer) was used for PECAM-1 staining using purified rat anti–mouse PECAM-1 mAb (BD Biosciences). The bound antibodies were detected using biotin-conjugated rabbit anti–rat (Vector Laboratories) in combination with Streptavidin-FITC antibody (Vector Laboratories). Sections stained as above but in the absence of the primary antibodies served as the negative controls.
Generation of CD98hc-conditional cells
A P1 mouse ES cell clone containing the CD98hc gene was isolated from a 129Sv/J mouse library by PCR screening (Genome Systems, Inc.). The targeting vector consisted of a 1.4-kb 5' homologous region and a 4.9-kb 3' homologous region. The region of exon 1, encoding the transmembrane domain of CD98hc, was flanked with loxP site. A neomycin selection cassette flanked by Flp sites (provided by H. Beggs and G. Martin, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA) was inserted in intron 2. The linearized targeting construct was electroporated into R1 ES cells. G418-resistant colonies were selected for 7 d. Two homologous ES cell recombinants were identified by PCR analysis (forward primer A, 5'-GATAGACGGGAGTATTCAGCGAGGC-3'; and reverse primer B, 5'-CTCATGGTGCCTGCAGAAACGG-3') and confirmed by Southern blotting. PCR products were obtained at the expected size: 248 bp for WT allele and 304 bp for conditional knockout allele. These clones were karyotyped and subsequently injected into E3.5 C57BL/6 host blastocysts. The blastocysts were then transferred into pseudopregnant foster females. A total of seven chimeric males (distinguished by coat color) were obtained and bred to WT C57BL/6 females. Germ line offspring were genotyped by preparing DNA from tail biopsy for the presence of the targeted allele. Heterozygote males were identified by PCR analysis. Homozygote CD98hc-conditional knockout mice were bred onto human ß-actin FLPe deleter strain (The Jackson Laboratory) to excise the neomycin selection cassette. Mice were housed in the University of California, San Diego, animal facility, and experiments were approved by the University of California, San Diego, Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee.
Cell culture
MEFs were derived from CD98hc-conditional knockout homozygote embryos. MEFs were cultured in complete DME high glucose (Invitrogen), supplemented with 10% FBS (HyClone), 20 mM Hepes, pH 7.3 (Invitrogen), 0.1 mM nonessential amino acid (Invitrogen), 0.1 mM ß-mercaptoethanol (Invitrogen), and 2 mM L-Glutamine (Invitrogen). The CD98hc-null MEFs were generated by infecting CD98hc-conditional knockout MEFs with adeno-CRE encoding CRE recombinase. Viral titers ranged from 0.6 to 1.2 x 1012 U/ml. CD98hc deletion was detected by PCR (forward primer A, see the previous section; and reverse primer C, 5'-CAGGGTTCTGTGTATGTGGGCGG-3') and confirmed by flow cytometry. Cells were stimulated with 2 µg/ml (unless otherwise mentioned) LPA (1-oleoyl-2-hydroxy-sn-glycero-3 phosphate, monosodium salt) as described elsewhere (Zhong et al., 1998). In brief, MEFs were plated at 1 million per 10-cm Petri dish and treated every 4–5 h for 18 h (starting 24 h after plating). The reconstituted cells were generated by infecting CD98hc-null MEFs with pBabe-Puromycin retrovirus encoding or CD98hc/CD69 chimeras (Fenczik et al., 2001). Viruses were generated in EcoPack 293 cells (CLONTECH Laboratories, Inc.), and viral titers ranged from 0.9 to 1.7 x106 U/ml. After puromycin selection, chimera expression was confirmed by flow cytometry.
Visualizing/imaging Fn assembly
MEFs were seeded in 1% FBS at 10,000 cells/well in 24-well plates onto 12-mm coverslips coated with 4 µg/ml Fn and blocked with 0.5% BSA. Where indicated, either 25 µg/ml of exogenous plasma Fn or 10 µg/ml of activating anti-ß1 mAb, 9EG7, was added to the culture medium. After 48 h in culture, the cells were fixed with 2% PFA in PBS for 20 min and permeabilized for 10 min with 0.05% Triton X-100. Fixed cells were washed with PBS, and nonspecific sites were blocked with 3% BSA before the addition of primary antibody (rabbit anti-Fn [Sigma-Aldrich]; 1:2,000) for 2 h at 37°C. Specific binding was detected using goat anti–rabbit antibody conjugated with Alexa 488 (Invitrogen). The actin cytoskeleton was visualized by incubating with rhodamine-conjugated phalloidin while the nuclei were stained with DAPI (Invitrogen). Individual coverslips were mounted in aqueous mounting media with anti-fade (Gel Mount; Sigma-Aldrich). Digital images were captured at room temperature with a charge-coupled device camera (Orca ER; Hamamatsu) using a standard upright fluorescent microscope (Axioplan 2 [Carl Zeiss MicroImaging, Inc.; Plan-Neo Fluar 20x objective with 0.50 NA) controlled by the image capture and processing program Openlab (Improvision). Photoshop (Adobe) was used to increase the
of images.
Biochemical assessment of Fn assembly
To assess the Fn assembly biochemically, the DOC-soluble and -insoluble portions of the cell matrix were analyzed as described previously (Zijlstra et al., 1999). In brief, MEFs were plated at 3 million cells per 10-cm Petri dish in complete medium (Fn+) or Fn-depleted medium (Fn–). Fn-depleted medium was generated by depleting Fn from the FBS using gelatin Sepharose before preparing the medium (Zijlstra et al., 1999). The cells were incubated for 48 h, at which time the conditioned medium was collected. The cell monolayer was washed with 3x PBS and lysed in 2 ml 3% DOC, 50 mM Tris, pH 8.8, and 0.1 mM EDTA, with protease inhibitors (complete, mini protease inhibitor tablets; Roche) for 15 min at 4°C. The lysate was subsequently passed through a 23-gauge needle five times and spun at 35,000 g for 20 min to remove the insoluble material. The soluble component was kept for further analysis. The insoluble pellet was washed once with DOC lysis buffer and spun again. The pellet was solubilized in 50 µl reducing Laemmli buffer (62.5 mM Tris-HC1, pH 6.8, 1.5% SDS, 9% glycerol, 50 mM dithiothreitol, and 0.005% bromophenol blue). Samples were separated by SDS-PAGE and analyzed by Western blotting using rabbit anti-Fn antibody (Sigma-Aldrich) followed by an HRP-conjugated goat anti–rabbit IgG (Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories), and bands were visualized by chemiluminescence (Pierce Chemical Co.). Intensities of bands were quantified by scanning densitometry using ImageJ software.
Flow cytometry
Anti–mouse
1 (clone Ha 31/8), anti–mouse
2 (clone HM
2), anti–mouse
4 (PS/2), anti–mouse
5 (clone HM
5-1), anti–mouse
6 (clone GoH3), anti–mouse
v (clone RMV-7), anti–mouse ß1 (clone 9EG7) integrin, and anti–mouse CD98 (clone H202-141) were purchased from BD Biosciences and used at the recommended concentrations. Goat FITC-conjugated anti–rat IgG and goat FITC-conjugated anti–hamster IgG were obtained from Biosource International and were used as secondary antibodies for
4,
6,
v, and ß1; murine CD98; and
1,
2, and
5 detection, respectively. Fn 9–11 binding was assayed by two-color flow cytometry as previously described (Hughes et al., 2002) in the presence or absence of 10 µg/ml of activating anti-ß1 mAb 9EG7.
Fibrin clot retraction assay
This assay was performed by modification of a published method (Ylanne et al., 1993). In brief, WT or CD98hc-deficient MEFs were harvested with trypsin-EDTA (Invitrogen), quenched with complete medium, washed twice with PBS one time, and resuspended at 8.5 million cells per milliliter in serum-free DME (Invitrogen) buffered with 25 mM Hepes. 350 µl of this cell suspension was added to 7 x 45 mm siliconized glass cuvettes (Sienco, Inc.). Then, 200 µl of human platelet–poor plasma anticoagulated with ACD (85 mM sodium citrate, 65 mM citric acid, and 104 mM glucose) was added, followed by 200 µl Hepes-buffered DME containing 28 mM CaCl2 and 5 U/ml human thrombin (Sigma-Aldrich). Cuvettes were incubated at 37°C with 5% CO2. Images were acquired with a digital camera at 1 or 2 h, and subsequently the 2D area of the clot was measured using ImageJ software. The percentage of clot contraction was calculated according to the following equation: percentage of clot contraction (t = 1 h) = 100 ([area at t = 1 h/area at t = 0] x 100).
Cellular tension measurements
Polyacrylamide gels with embedded fluorescent beads on coverslips were prepared using previously described protocol (Wang and Pelham, 1998) with some modifications (see the supplemental text, available at http://www.jcb.org/cgi/content/full/jcb.200705090/DC1). Cell culturing, image acquisition, and strain map construction were performed as follows. WT and CD98-deficient MEFs were harvested with trypsin-EDTA (Invitrogen), quenched with complete medium, washed twice with 1x PBS, and resuspended at 0.1 million cells per milliliter in serum-free DME (Invitrogen) buffered with 25 mM Hepes. Cells were kept in suspension for 1 h at room temperature, and 20,000 cells were plated on a polyacrylamide sheet. After culturing on a polyacrylamide sheet for 2 h, images of both cell types were acquired within 10 min from each other. A microscope (TE2000; Nikon) equipped with environmentally controlled enclosure (37°C and 5% CO2), 60x 1.2 NA water objective (Olympus), motorized stage (Ludl), excitation filter wheel (Ludl), filter set (Semrock), and camera (CoolSnap HQ; Roper Scientific) was used to acquire images of fluorescent beads embedded in polyacrylamide and brightfield images of cells in six different fields. After addition of 200 µl RIPA buffer to 2 ml of media, cells detached and new images of the same fields were taken to collect reference data on beads' location in nonstressed gel. Images of fluorescent beads were analyzed using image analysis software written in Matlab (courtesy of G. Danuser's and C. Waterman-Storer's groups, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA). Images were divided to 1.6-µm2 areas, and displacement vectors between were calculated (Ji and Danuser, 2005). Vectors (Fig. 5 C, green) on the strain map were increased five times for visualization purposes. Brightfield and strain map images were superimposed using Photoshop (Adobe). Integrated strains were calculated by summing up the magnitudes (WT, 7,400 pixels; and CD98hc null, 1,444 pixels) of the strain vectors inside the cell mask and dividing them by the cell area (WT, 2,945 arbitrary units; and CD98hc null, 1,873 arbitrary units).
Rho GTPase assay
WT and CD98hc-null MEFs were grown in 0.5% serum for 24 h and then in serum-free medium for another 17 h. Cells were detached and kept in suspension at room temperature for 1 h in serum-free medium. Serum-starved cells were then plated on 3D Fn plates (3 million cells/plate), and RhoA activity was assayed at the indicated time points. For LPA treatment, cells were grown and serum starved as described, 1 µg/ml LPA was added to each plate, and RhoA activity was measured after a 5-min incubation. 3D Fn matrix was prepared as described previously (Cukierman et al., 2001) using NIH3T3 cells cultured in a 10-cm Petri dish. RhoA activity was measured using a commercially available ELISA-based assay (G-LISA; Cytoskeleton, Inc.) according to the manufacturer's protocol. Lysates were also resolved by SDS-PAGE and immunoblotted with rabbit anti-RhoA (67B9) antibody (Cell Signaling), followed by a IRDye 800CW goat anti–rabbit IgG (LI-COR Biosciences), and bands were visualized by scanning blots using an infrared imaging system (Odyssey; LI-COR Biosciences).
Online supplemental material
Fig. S1 shows that CD98hc contributes to the integrin-dependent activation of FAK and p130CAS via its integrin binding domain by reconstitution experiments. The supplemental text provides additional methodological details for the cellular tension measurements and for the assessment of tyrosine phosphorylation. Online supplemental material is available at http://www.jcb.org/cgi/content/full/jcb.200705090/DC1.
Submitted: 15 May 2007
Accepted: 12 July 2007
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Ali, I.U., V. Mautner, R. Lanza, and R.O. Hynes. 1977. Restoration of normal morphology, adhesion and cytoskeleton in transformed cells by addition of a transformation-sensitive surface protein. Cell. 11:115–126.[CrossRef][Medline]
Arias-Salgado, E.G., S. Lizano, S.J. Shattil, and M.H. Ginsberg. 2005. Specification of the direction of adhesive signaling by the integrin ß cytoplasmic domain. J. Biol. Chem. 280:29699–29707.
Beningo, K.A., and Y.L. Wang. 2002. Flexible substrata for the detection of cellular traction forces. Trends Cell Biol. 12:79–84.[CrossRef][Medline]
Bissell, M.J., D.C. Radisky, A. Rizki, V.M. Weaver, and O.W. Petersen. 2002. The organizing principle: microenvironmental influences in the normal and malignant breast. Differentiation. 70:537–546.[CrossRef][Medline]
Boucaut, J.C., T. Darribere, S.D. Li, H. Boulekbache, K.M. Yamada, and J.P. Thiery. 1985. Evidence for the role of fibronectin in amphibian gastrulation. J. Embryol. Exp. Morphol. 89(Suppl.):211–227.[Medline]
Boudreau, N.J., and P.L. Jones. 1999. Extracellular matrix and integrin signaling: the shape of things to come. Biochem. J. 339:481–488.[CrossRef][Medline]
Brown, N.H., S.L. Gregory, W.L. Rickoll, L.I. Fessler, M. Prout, R.A. White, and J.W. Fristrom. 2002. Talin is essential for integrin function in Drosophila. Dev. Cell. 3:569–579.[CrossRef][Medline]
Checovich, W.J., and D.F. Mosher. 1993. Lysophosphatidic acid enhances fibronectin binding to adherent cells. Arterioscler. Thromb. 13:1662–1667.
Chou, F.L., J.M. Hill, J.C. Hsieh, J. Pouyssegur, A. Brunet, A. Glading, F. Uberall, J.W. Ramos, M.H. Werner, and M.H. Ginsberg. 2003. PEA-15 binding to ERK1/2 MAPKs is required for its modulation of integrin activation. J. Biol. Chem. 278:52587–52597.
Chrzanowska-Wodnicka, M., and K. Burridge. 1996. Rho-stimulated contractility drives the formation of stress fibers and focal adhesions. J. Cell Biol. 133:1403–1415.
Corbett, S.A., and J.E. Schwarzbauer. 1999. Requirements for
(5)ß(1) integrin- mediated retraction of fibronectin-fibrin matrices. J. Biol. Chem. 274:20943–20948.
Cukierman, E., R. Pankov, D.R. Stevens, and K.M. Yamada. 2001. Taking cell-matrix adhesions to the third dimension. Science. 294:1708–1712.
Davidson, L.A., M. Marsden, R. Keller, and D.W. Desimone. 2006. Integrin
5beta1 and fibronectin regulate polarized cell protrusions required for Xenopus convergence and extension. Curr. Biol. 16:833–844.[CrossRef][Medline]
Deves, R., and C.A. Boyd. 2000. Surface antigen CD98(4F2): not a single membrane protein, but a family of proteins with multiple functions. J. Membr. Biol. 173:165–177.[CrossRef][Medline]
Diaz, L.A., Jr., A.W. Friedman, X. He, R.D. Kuick, S.M. Hanash, and D.A. Fox. 1997. Monocyte-dependent regulation of T lymphocyte activation through CD98. Int. Immunol. 9:1221–1231.
Erickson, H.P. 1994. Reversible unfolding of fibronectin type III and immunoglobulin domains provides the structural basis for stretch and elasticity of titin and fibronectin. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 91:10114–10118.
Erickson, H.P. 2002. Stretching fibronectin. J. Muscle Res. Cell Motil. 23:575–580.[CrossRef][Medline]
Fenczik, C.A., R. Zent, M. Dellos, D.A. Calderwood, J. Satriano, C. Kelly, and M.H. Ginsberg. 2001. Distinct domains of CD98hc regulate integrins and amino acid transport. J. Biol. Chem. 276:8746–8752.
Féral, C.C., N. Nishiya, C.A. Fenczik, H. Stuhlmann, M. Slepak, and M.H. Ginsberg. 2005. CD98hc (SLC3A2) mediates integrin signaling. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 102:355–360.
Francis, S.E., K.L. Goh, K. Hodivala-Dilke, B.L. Bader, M. Stark, D. Davidson, and R.O. Hynes. 2002. Central roles of
5beta1 integrin and fibronectin in vascular development in mouse embryos and embryoid bodies. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 22:927–933.
George, E.L., E.N. Georges-Labouesse, R.S. Patel-King, H. Rayburn, and R.O. Hynes. 1993. Defects in mesoderm, neural tube and vascular development in mouse embryos lacking fibronectin. Development. 119:1079–1091.[Abstract]
George, E.L., H.S. Baldwin, and R.O. Hynes. 1997. Fibronectins are essential for heart and blood vessel morphogenesis but are dispensable for initial specification of precursor cells. Blood. 90:3073–3081.
Grinnell, F. 1984. Fibronectin and wound healing. J. Cell. Biochem. 26:107–116.[CrossRef][Medline]
Hall, A. 1998. Rho GTPases and the actin cytoskeleton. Science. 279:509–514.
Hughes, P.E., B. Oertli, M. Hansen, F.L. Chou, B.M. Willumsen, and M.H. Ginsberg. 2002. Suppression of integrin activation by activated Ras or Raf does not correlate with bulk activation of ERK MAP kinase. Mol. Biol. Cell. 13:2256–2265.
Hynes, R.O. 1994. Genetic analyses of cell-matrix interactions in development. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 4:569–574.[CrossRef][Medline]
Ingber, D. 1991. Integrins as mechanochemical transducers. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 3:841–848.[CrossRef][Medline]
Ji, L., and G. Danuser. 2005. Tracking quasi-stationary flow of weak fluorescent signals by adaptive multi-frame correlation. J. Microsc. 220:150–167.[Medline]
Jiang, G., G. Giannone, D.R. Critchley, E. Fukumoto, and M.P. Sheetz. 2003. Two-piconewton slip bond between fibronectin and the cytoskeleton depends on talin. Nature. 424:334–337.[CrossRef][Medline]
Krammer, A., H. Lu, B. Isralewitz, K. Schulten, and V. Vogel. 1999. Forced unfolding of the fibronectin type III module reveals a tensile molecular recognition switch. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 96:1351–1356.
Kranenburg, O., M. Poland, M. Gebbink, L. Oomen, and W.H. Moolenaar. 1997. Dissociation of LPA-induced cytoskeletal contraction from stress fiber formation by differential localization of RhoA. J. Cell Sci. 110:2417–2427.[Abstract]
Kuo, J.C., W.J. Wang, C.C. Yao, P.R. Wu, and R.H. Chen. 2006. The tumor suppressor DAPK inhibits cell motility by blocking the integrin-mediated polarity pathway. J. Cell Biol. 172:619–631.
LaFlamme, S.E., and K.L. Auer. 1996. Integrin signaling. Semin. Cancer Biol. 7:111–118.[CrossRef][Medline]
Lelievre, S.A., V.M. Weaver, J.A. Nickerson, C.A. Larabell, A. Bhaumik, O.W. Petersen, and M.J. Bissell. 1998. Tissue phenotype depends on reciprocal interactions between the extracellular matrix and the structural organization of the nucleus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 95:14711–14716.
Mao, Y., and J.E. Schwarzbauer. 2005. Fibronectin fibrillogenesis, a cell-mediated matrix assembly process. Matrix Biol. 24:389–399.[CrossRef][Medline]
Mautner, V., and R.O. Hynes. 1977. Surface distribution of LETS protein in relation to the cytoskeleton of normal and transformed cells. J. Cell Biol. 75:743–768.
McKeown-Longo, P.J., and D.F. Mosher. 1983. Binding of plasma fibronectin to cell layers of human skin fibroblasts. J. Cell Biol. 97:466–472.
McKeown-Longo, P.J., and D.F. Mosher. 1985. Interaction of the 70,000-mol-wt amino-terminal fragment of fibronectin with the matrix-assembly receptor of fibroblasts. J. Cell Biol. 100:364–374.
Midwood, K.S., L.V. Valenick, H.C. Hsia, and J.E. Schwarzbauer. 2004. Coregulation of fibronectin signaling and matrix contraction by tenascin-C and syndecan-4. Mol. Biol. Cell. 15:5670–5677.
Mosher, D.F. 1984. Physiology of fibronectin. Annu. Rev. Med. 35:561–575.[CrossRef][Medline]
Muir, I.F. 1990. On the nature of keloid and hypertrophic scars. Br. J. Plast. Surg. 43:61–69.[CrossRef][Medline]
Ohashi, T., D.P. Kiehart, and H.P. Erickson. 2002. Dual labeling of the fibronectin matrix and actin cytoskeleton with green fluorescent protein variants. J. Cell Sci. 115:1221–1229.
Paszek, M.J., N. Zahir, K.R. Johnson, J.N. Lakins, G.I. Rozenberg, A. Gefen, C.A. Reinhart-King, S.S. Margulies, M. Dembo, D. Boettiger, et al. 2005. Tensional homeostasis and the malignant phenotype. Cancer Cell. 8:241–254.[CrossRef][Medline]
Peters, J.H., and R.O. Hynes. 1996. Fibronectin isoform distribution in the mouse. I. The alternatively spliced EIIIB, EIIIA, and V segments show widespread codistribution in the developing mouse embryo. Cell Adhes. Commun. 4:103–125.[Medline]
Ramos, J.W., and D.W. DeSimone. 1996. Xenopus embryonic cell adhesion to fibronectin: position-specific activation of RGD/synergy site-dependent migratory behavior at gastrulation. J. Cell Biol. 134:227–240.
Ramos, J.W., C.A. Whittaker, and D.W. DeSimone. 1996. Integrin-dependent adhesive activity is spatially controlled by inductive signals at gastrulation. Development. 122:2873–2883.[Abstract]
Ren, X.D., W.B. Kiosses, and M.A. Schwartz. 1999. Regulation of the small GTP-binding protein Rho by cell adhesion and the cytoskeleton. EMBO J. 18:578–585.[CrossRef][Medline]
Ruoslahti, E. 1984. Fibronectin in cell adhesion and invasion. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 3:43–51.[CrossRef][Medline]
Schmeichel, K.L., V.M. Weaver, and M.J. Bissell. 1998. Structural cues from the tissue microenvironment are essential determinants of the human mammary epithelial cell phenotype. J. Mammary Gland Biol. Neoplasia. 3:201–213.[CrossRef][Medline]
Schwarzbauer, J.E. 1991. Identification of the fibronectin sequences required for assembly of a fibrillar matrix. J. Cell Biol. 113:1463–1473.
Sechler, J.L., Y. Takada, and J.E. Schwarzbauer. 1996. Altered rate of fibronectin matrix assembly by deletion of the first type III repeats. J. Cell Biol. 134:573–583.
Sechler, J.L., S.A. Corbett, and J.E. Schwarzbauer. 1997. Modulatory roles for integrin activation and the synergy site of fibronectin during matrix assembly. Mol. Biol. Cell. 8:2563–2573.
Sechler, J.L., A.M. Cumiskey, D.M. Gazzola, and J.E. Schwarzbauer. 2000. A novel RGD-independent fibronectin assembly pathway initiated by
4beta1 integrin binding to the alternatively spliced V region. J. Cell Sci. 113:1491–1498.[Abstract]
Sechler, J.L., H. Rao, A.M. Cumiskey, I. Vega-Colon, M.S. Smith, T. Murata, and J.E. Schwarzbauer. 2001. A novel fibronectin binding site required for fibronectin fibril growth during matrix assembly. J. Cell Biol. 154:1081–1088.
Shattil, S.J. 2005. Integrins and Src: dynamic duo of adhesion signaling. Trends Cell Biol. 15:399–403.[CrossRef][Medline]
Sottile, J., and D.F. Mosher. 1993. Assembly of fibronectin molecules with mutations or deletions of the carboxyl-terminal type I modules. Biochemistry. 32:1641–1647.[CrossRef][Medline]
Tadokoro, S., S.J. Shattil, K. Eto, V. Tai, R.C. Liddington, J.M. de Pereda, M.H. Ginsberg, and D.A. Calderwood. 2003. Talin binding to integrin ß tails: a final common step in integrin activation. Science. 302:103–106.
Tsumura, H., N. Suzuki, H. Saito, M. Kawano, S. Otake, Y. Kozuka, H. Komada, M. Tsurudome, and Y. Ito. 2003. The targeted disruption of the CD98 gene results in embryonic lethality. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 308:847–851.[CrossRef][Medline]
van Corven, E.J., A. Groenink, K. Jalink, T. Eichholtz, and W.H. Moolenaar. 1989. Lysophosphatidate-induced cell proliferation: identification and dissection of signaling pathways mediated by G proteins. Cell. 59:45–54.[CrossRef][Medline]
Wang, Y.L., and R.J. Pelham Jr. 1998. Preparation of a flexible, porous polyacrylamide substrate for mechanical studies of cultured cells. Methods Enzymol. 298:489–496.[Medline]
Weaver, V.M., and P. Gilbert. 2004. Watch thy neighbor: cancer is a communal affair. J. Cell Sci. 117:1287–1290.
Weaver, V.M., A.H. Fischer, O.W. Peterson, and M.J. Bissell. 1996. The importance of the microenvironment in breast cancer progression: recapitulation of mammary tumorigenesis using a unique human mammary epithelial cell model and a three-dimensional culture assay. Biochem. Cell Biol. 74:833–851.[Medline]
Wierzbicka-Patynowski, I., and J.E. Schwarzbauer. 2002. Regulatory role for SRC and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase in initiation of fibronectin matrix assembly. J. Biol. Chem. 277:19703–19708.
Wierzbicka-Patynowski, I., and J.E. Schwarzbauer. 2003. The ins and outs of fibronectin matrix assembly. J. Cell Sci. 116:3269–3276.
Wu, C., A.E. Chung, and J.A. McDonald. 1995a. A novel role for
3 ß 1 integrins in extracellular matrix assembly. J. Cell Sci. 108:2511–2523.[Abstract]
Wu, C., A.J. Fields, B.A. Kapteijn, and J.A. McDonald. 1995b. The role of
4 ß 1 integrin in cell motility and fibronectin matrix assembly. J. Cell Sci. 108:821–829.[Abstract]
Wu, C., V.M. Keivens, T.E. O'Toole, J.A. McDonald, and M.H. Ginsberg. 1995c. Integrin activation and cytoskeletal interaction are essential for the assembly of a fibronectin matrix. Cell. 83:715–724.[CrossRef][Medline]
Ylanne, J., Y. Chen, T.E. O'Toole, J.C. Loftus, Y. Takada, and M.H. Ginsberg. 1993. Distinct functions of integrin
and ß subunit cytoplasmic domains in cell spreading and formation of focal adhesions. J. Cell Biol. 122:223–233.
Zhang, Q., W.J. Checovich, D.M. Peters, R.M. Albrecht, and D.F. Mosher. 1994. Modulation of cell surface fibronectin assembly sites by lysophosphatidic acid. J. Cell Biol. 127:1447–1459.
Zhong, C., M. Chrzanowska-Wodnicka, J. Brown, A. Shaub, A.M. Belkin, and K. Burridge. 1998. Rho-mediated contractility exposes a cryptic site in fibronectin and induces fibronectin matrix assembly. J. Cell Biol. 141:539–551.
Zijlstra, A., N.R. McCabe, and M.E. Schelling. 1999. Expression and assembly of the angiogenic marker B-fibronectin by endothelial cells in vitro: regulation by confluency. Angiogenesis. 3:77–87.[CrossRef][Medline]