JCB logo
Quantitative Colocalization Analysis Software
  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents

Published online
doi:10.1083/jcb.1802rr3
The Journal of Cell Biology, Vol. 180, No. 2, 251-
The Rockefeller University Press, 0021-9525 $30.00
© Robinson
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF, 677K)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Services
Right arrow Email this article
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new content in the JCB
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Robinson, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Robinson, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Research Roundup

Organelles in parallel


Endocytic organelles in three eukaryotic kingdoms evolved in parallel, according to Joel Dacks, Mark Field (University of Cambridge, UK), and Pak Poon (Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada).

Unlike mitochondria and chloroplasts, the membrane trafficking system did not arise through endosymbiosis; it evolved from within. When fungi, plants, and animals split off from their last common ancestor, some parts of the system were "caught midstream in the process of becoming discrete organelles," says Dacks.

To track the development of the system, the authors performed phylogenetic analyses of three components: Rab5 and β-adaptins, which help sort cargo into vesicles, and the endocytic syntaxins, which assist vesicle fusion. The team found that in the common ancestor, each was represented by a single molecule that performed multiple functions. After divergence, the components evolved in parallel through gene duplication and specialization. For instance, syntaxin E homologues in each kingdom now include one that drives fusion at the early endosome and another that helps fuse late endosomes to the lysosome. These two sets of syntaxins arose after the eukaryotic split and independently adopted similar functions within each group.

"The distinction among the endosomes was less clear at the start and was firmed up afterward," says Field. The need for increased cargo specificity and sorting efficiency in each group seems to have driven the parallel evolution. Formula

Reference:

Dacks, J., et al. 2008. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. doi:10.1073/pnas.0707318105.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



Richard Robinson

rrobinson{at}nasw.org


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF, 677K)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Services
Right arrow Email this article
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new content in the JCB
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Robinson, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Robinson, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?


  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents