|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Article |
The class V myosin motor protein, Myo2, plays a major role in mitochondrial motility in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Correspondence to B. Westermann: benedikt.westermann{at}uni-bayreuth.de
The actin cytoskeleton is essential for polarized, bud-directed movement of cellular membranes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and thus ensures accurate inheritance of organelles during cell division. Also, mitochondrial distribution and inheritance depend on the actin cytoskeleton, though the precise molecular mechanisms are unknown. Here, we establish the class V myosin motor protein, Myo2, as an important mediator of mitochondrial motility in budding yeast. We found that mutants with abnormal expression levels of Myo2 or its associated light chain, Mlc1, exhibit aberrant mitochondrial morphology and loss of mitochondrial DNA. Specific mutations in the globular tail of Myo2 lead to aggregation of mitochondria in the mother cell. Isolated mitochondria lacking functional Myo2 are severely impaired in their capacity to bind to actin filaments in vitro. Time-resolved fluorescence microscopy revealed a block of bud-directed anterograde mitochondrial movement in cargo binding–defective myo2 mutant cells. We conclude that Myo2 plays an important and direct role for mitochondrial motility and inheritance in budding yeast.
 |
Introduction |
|---|
 TopAbstract Introduction ResultsDiscussionMaterials and methodsReferences |
|---|
The budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae has proven to be an excellent model organism to study the molecular basis of mitochondrial dynamics, and most of the evolutionarily conserved key components were first discovered in yeast (Hermann and Shaw, 1998; Jensen et al., 2000; Okamoto and Shaw, 2005; Merz et al., 2007). However, although many mechanistic details of the machineries mediating mitochondrial fusion and fission have been revealed in recent years (Shaw and Nunnari, 2002; Westermann, 2003; Hoppins et al., 2007), the identity of the proteins driving cytoskeleton-dependent mitochondrial movement in yeast is still under debate.
The evidence for a central role of the actin cytoskeleton in mitochondrial motility in budding yeast is clear cut. Numerous mutations in genes encoding actin or factors involved in actin filament dynamics lead to aberrant mitochondrial distribution and morphology (Drubin et al., 1993; Lazzarino et al., 1994; Simon et al., 1995; Smith et al., 1995; Hermann et al., 1997; Simon et al., 1997; Yang et al., 1999; Singer et al., 2000; Boldogh et al., 2001a; Fehrenbacher et al., 2004; Altmann and Westermann, 2005). Treatment of wild-type cells with actin filament–depolymerizing drugs produces defects in mitochondrial shape and movement (Boldogh et al., 1998), and fluorescence microscopy of fixed and live yeast cells revealed that mitochondria colocalize with and move along actin cables (Drubin et al., 1993; Lazzarino et al., 1994; Simon et al., 1997; Fehrenbacher et al., 2004). Isolated mitochondria bind to actin filaments in vitro in an ATP-sensitive manner (Lazzarino et al., 1994; Simon et al., 1995; Boldogh et al., 1998).
The myosin family of actin-based motors consists of at least 15 structurally and functionally distinct classes. In particular, class V family members have been shown to participate in numerous membrane trafficking events (Reck-Peterson et al., 2000). The yeast genome encodes five myosin-related motor proteins (Winsor and Schiebel, 1997). The MYO1 gene encodes a class II myosin that, depending on the strain background, is either essential or nonessential for viability; the essential MYO2 and the nonessential MYO4 genes encode class V myosins and the nonessential MYO3 and MYO5 genes encode class I myosins. A myosin light chain that associates with Myo1 and Myo2 heavy chains is encoded by the essential MLC1 gene (Stevens and Davis, 1998; Luo et al., 2004). In yeast, class V myosins are of major importance for polarized growth and actin-based organelle segregation. Cargos transported by Myo2 or Myo4 include post-Golgi secretory vesicles, the trans-Golgi network, the cortical endoplasmic reticulum, vacuolar membranes, peroxisomes, mRNA–protein complexes, and microtubule plus ends (Pruyne et al., 2004). Thus, it is tempting to speculate that mitochondria might also be transported by class V myosins. However, several genetic attempts to identify a myosin-like protein responsible for mitochondrial movement have failed so far. 
myo1, myo3, myo4, and myo5 single deletion mutants (Simon et al., 1995; Dimmer et al., 2002; Boldogh et al., 2004) and a myo3 myo5 double mutant (Goodson et al., 1996) do not display major defects in mitochondrial distribution and morphology. Moreover, mitochondria have been reported to appear normal in certain conditional myo2 mutants, namely myo2-66 (Simon et al., 1995), myo2-338 (Itoh et al., 2002), and myo2-6IQ (Boldogh et al., 2004), and in double mutant myo2-66 myo4 (Simon et al., 1995). Based on these findings, it is assumed that myosins do not play an important role in mitochondrial motility and inheritance in budding yeast (Boldogh et al., 2001b; Pruyne et al., 2004; Boldogh and Pon, 2006).
However, it has been reported that the myo2-573 allele induces defects in mitochondrial distribution toward the bud (Itoh et al., 2002, 2004), and close inspection of mutants containing the myo2-66 allele revealed an accumulation of mitochondria in the mother cell (Boldogh et al., 2004). Based on these results, a model has been proposed that assigns to Myo2 a rather indirect role in mitochondrial inheritance. According to this model, Myo2 drives movement of yet unknown retention factors from the mother cell to the bud tip, where these factors serve to anchor mitochondria to prevent retrograde movement back into the mother cell (Boldogh et al., 2004; Boldogh and Pon, 2006). In this scenario, entry of mitochondria into the bud would be mediated by myosin-independent mechanisms, and Myo2 would not be required for interaction of mitochondria with microfilaments.
We recently screened a collection of yeast strains containing essential genes under control of a titratable promoter to identify novel components involved in mitochondrial morphogenesis. The observation that depletion of Myo2 or Mlc1 results in the formation of highly aberrant mitochondria (Altmann and Westermann, 2005) prompted us to investigate whether Myo2 plays a direct role in mediating interactions of mitochondria with the cytoskeleton and bud-directed mitochondrial movement. Our results described here suggest that Myo2 is much more important for mitochondrial motility and inheritance than previously anticipated.
|
Results |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionResultsDiscussionMaterials and methodsReferences |
|---|
|
Next, we analyzed the ultrastructure of mitochondria in TetO7-myo2 and TetO7-mlc1 cells by electron microscopy. Promoter activity was repressed by growth in Dox-containing medium, cells were fixed and stained, and ultrathin sections were prepared and analyzed by transmission electron microscopy. Wild-type control cells displayed normal mitochondrial tubules with diameters of 
300–500 nm (Fig. 1 C). In contrast, cells depleted of Myo2 or Mlc1 frequently showed ring-shaped mitochondria with a very narrow matrix space of <100 nm in width (Fig. 1 C). This demonstrates that loss of Myo2 has severe effects on the internal structure of mitochondria. It is conceivable that the aberrant structures seen in electron micrographs correspond to the ring-shaped mitochondria observed by fluorescence microscopy (Fig. 1 B). Cross sections of complete yeast cells revealed an accumulation of coated vesicles in addition to aberrant mitochondrial morphology (Fig. S1, available at http://www.jcb.org/cgi/content/full/jcb.200709099/DC1), which suggests that secretion and bud growth are also impaired under these conditions.
We observed some residual growth of TetO7-myo2 and TetO7-mlc1 cells on Dox-containing medium (Fig. 1 A). This suggests that a basal expression of Myo2 and Mlc1 occurs even under repressive conditions. However, TetO7-myo2 and TetO7-mlc1 cells were unable to grow on nonfermentable carbon sources (unpublished data). As many mutants defective in mitochondrial morphology lose their mitochondrial genome (Berger and Yaffe, 2000), we asked whether respiratory deficiency of TetO7-myosin strains might be caused by the loss of mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA). To test this, cellular DNA was visualized by DAPI staining and fluorescence microscopy in wild-type, TetO7-myo1, TetO7-myo2, and TetO7-mlc1 cells. Numerous spots of fluorescent mtDNA nucleoids were observed in wild-type and TetO7-myo1 cells but never in TetO7-myo2 and TetO7-mlc1 cells (Fig. 1 D). Thus, nonphysiologically high expression levels in the absence of Dox lead to the loss of the mitochondrial genome, which indicates that normal Myo2 and Mlc1 levels are required for maintenance of mtDNA. We conclude that Myo2 and its associated light chain Mlc1 are important for normal mitochondrial distribution and morphology, maintenance of the internal structure of mitochondria, and maintenance of mtDNA.
Myo2 and Mlc1 are required for binding of mitochondria to actin filaments in vitro
The interaction of isolated mitochondria with actin filaments in vitro has been shown to be ATP-sensitive, reversible, and dependent on mitochondria-associated proteins (Lazzarino et al., 1994). As these properties are compatible with the view that myosin-related motor proteins mediate organelle–cytoskeleton interactions, we asked whether Myo2 and Mlc1 are involved in this process. First, we incubated purified wild-type mitochondria with filamentous actin in the absence or presence of ATP, sedimented the organelles through a sucrose cushion, and detected bound actin by immunoblotting. Mitochondria were found to interact with actin filaments in an ATP-sensitive manner (Fig. 2 A, lanes 1 and 2; and Fig. 2 E).
This binding activity could be removed by the extraction of mitochondria with high-salt buffer (Fig. 2 A, lanes 3 and 4; and Fig. 2 E) and was restored by the readdition of salt extract (Fig. 2 A, lanes 5 and 6; and Fig. 2 E). These results are very similar to observations made previously by Boldogh et al. (1998) and confirm that mitochondria–cytoskeleton interactions are mediated by proteins peripherally bound to the mitochondrial surface. Next, we tested mitochondria purified from TetO7-myo2 and TetO7-mlc1 cells grown under repressing conditions. Depletion of Myo2 reduced the mitochondrial actin binding capacity to 51% compared with the wild type (Fig. 2, B and E). Similarly, depletion of Mlc1 reduced actin binding activity to 55% (Fig. 2 B and E), demonstrating that Myo2 and its associated light chain are required for an efficient interaction of mitochondria with actin filaments. Remarkably, addition of salt extract prepared from wild-type mitochondria improved the actin binding activity of Myo2-depleted mitochondria from 51 to 95% (Fig. 2, C and E). This suggests that Myo2 is the peripheral mitochondria-associated factor that becomes limiting in TetO7-myo2 mitochondria. Moreover, incubation of wild-type mitochondria with affinity-purified antibodies directed against Myo2 abolished ATP-sensitive mitochondrial actin binding activity completely, whereas the same amount of antibodies directed against the mitochondrial inner membrane protein Mdm31 (Dimmer et al., 2005) had no effect (Fig. 2, D and E). This result demonstrates that Myo2 on the mitochondrial surface is required to establish interactions of the organelle with the cytoskeleton.
|
Specific mutations in the Myo2 globular tail affect mitochondrial distribution and morphology
The carboxy terminal globular tail of Myo2 mediates specific binding of the myosin motor to cargo membranes such as vacuoles (Catlett and Weisman, 1998) and secretory vesicles (Schott et al., 1999). It consists of two structurally and functionally distinct subdomains; the proximal half binds to vacuolar membranes, whereas the distal half interacts with secretory vesicles (Catlett et al., 2000; Pashkova et al., 2005, 2006). We asked whether the Myo2 globular tail has a role in mitochondrial distribution and morphology. To test this, we used a series of point mutants carrying substitutions of single amino acid residues in regions critical for cargo binding. Alleles myo2(Q1233R), myo2(G1248D), myo2(D1297N), myo2(D1297G), myo2(L1301P), myo2(N1304S), myo2(N1304D), and myo2(N1307D) cause specific defects in vacuolar inheritance (Catlett and Weisman, 1998; Catlett et al., 2000; Pashkova et al., 2006). These mutants do not show any growth defects, which indicates that essential cellular functions, such as secretion or organization of the cytoskeleton, are not severely impaired (Catlett and Weisman, 1998; Catlett et al., 2000; Pashkova et al., 2006). Alleles myo2(L1331S), myo2(L1411S), myo2(Y1415E), myo2(K1444A), and myo2(Q1447R) carry amino acid substitutions in the secretory vesicle binding site (Pashkova et al., 2006). Vacuole movement is fully functional in these mutants; however, they show severe growth defects because of defective vesicular transport (Pashkova et al., 2006).
Subdomain-specific myo2 mutants expressing mtGFP were incubated at 30 and 37°C, and mitochondrial morphology was observed by fluorescence microscopy. Wild-type cells and secretion-specific mutants contained branched tubular mitochondria in 84–99% of the cells at both temperatures (Fig. 3, A and B; and Table I). Virtually all budded cells contained mitochondria partitioned to the daughter cell (Table I). In contrast, a large percentage of cells contained aggregated and/or unpartitioned mitochondria in the following six vacuole-specific mutants: myo2(Q1233R), myo2(D1297G), myo2(L1301P), myo2(N1304S), myo2(N1304D), and myo2(N1307D) (Fig. 3, A and B; and Table I). Mitochondrial defects were most pronounced in myo2(L1301P) and myo2(Q1233R); at a nonpermissive temperature, 83 or 73%, respectively, of mutant cells contained mitochondria that were aggregated or clumped in the mother cell, whereas buds were largely devoid of mitochondria (Fig. 3, A and B; and Table I). Only two vacuole-specific alleles, myo2(G1248D) and myo2(D1297N), did not produce any significant mitochondrial defects. We conclude that the subdomain of the Myo2 tail responsible for vacuolar movement is also important for mitochondrial distribution and morphology. The fact that two vacuole-specific alleles did not produce mitochondrial defects suggests that the mitochondrial binding site on the Myo2 tail largely overlaps with, but is not identical to, the vacuolar binding site.
|
|
The globular tail of Myo2 is required for binding of mitochondria to actin filaments in vitro
We asked whether the globular tail of Myo2 is critical for interaction of mitochondria with actin filaments. Mitochondria were isolated from the wild type and myo2(L1301P) and myo2(Q1233R) mutants, incubated with actin filaments in the absence or presence of ATP, and centrifuged through a sucrose cushion, and bound actin was quantified by immunoblotting. We observed that actin-binding activity of mutant mitochondria was reduced to 61 or 37%, respectively, in comparison to the wild type (Fig. 4, A and B).
Similar effects were found when mitochondrial actin-binding activity was observed directly in the visual assay. While in the absence of ATP, 90% of wild-type mitochondria were found associated with actin filaments, and this number was reduced to 34% for myo2(L1301P) mitochondria and 36% for myo2(Q1233R) mitochondria (Fig. 4, C and D). These results point to an important role of the proximal half of the Myo2 globular tail in mediating mitochondria–cytoskeleton interactions.
|
|
|
Discussion |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionResultsDiscussionMaterials and methodsReferences |
|---|
A key role of Myo2 in mitochondrial transport is compatible with several observations that have been reported early after the discovery of the actin dependence of mitochondrial inheritance. Yeast actin mutants that exhibit specific mitochondrial defects contain amino acid exchanges under or near the myosin footprint (Drubin et al., 1993). This observation suggested immediately that actin–myosin interactions might underlie the cytoplasmic organization of mitochondria (Drubin et al., 1993). Furthermore, saturation of myosin-binding sites on actin filaments with the globular head domain of skeletal muscle myosin was observed to block binding of mitochondria in vitro (Lazzarino et al., 1994), and a mitochondria-associated motor activity was found to display an ATP concentration dependence similar to that of myosin family members in a microfilament sliding assay (Simon et al., 1995). However, it has been argued that Myo2 is unlikely to be the major mitochondrial motor because reduction of the length of the Myo2 lever arm in the myo2-6IQ mutant is expected to decrease the velocity of the motor but was found to have no effect on the mean velocity of mitochondrial movement (Boldogh et al., 2004). However, it has been pointed out that Myo2-dependent movement of secretory vesicles in the myo2-6IQ mutant is even faster than that of mitochondria in wild-type cells, which suggests that, in the case of mitochondria, Myo2 velocity may not be the limiting factor (Frederick and Shaw, 2007). We consider it likely that several motor molecules must cooperate to move a large organelle, such as a mitochondrion. In this case, velocity would not be expected to be limited by the speed of a single, processively moving motor molecule.
The fact that mutations in the proximal half of the Myo2 globular tail impair binding of mitochondria to actin filaments suggests that the sites responsible for establishing interactions of the motor with mitochondria and vacuoles overlap. Although the identity of the mitochondrial Myo2 receptor remains to be identified, two previously characterized proteins potentially cooperate with Myo2 in mitochondrial distribution and morphology. Ypt11 is a small Rab-type GTPase, and Mmr1 is a protein concentrated on mitochondria in the bud. Both components act as high-dose suppressors of myo2 mutants, and a ypt11 mmr1 double mutant shows severe mitochondrial partitioning defects (Itoh et al., 2002, 2004). However, ypt11 and mmr1 single mutants do not display strong mitochondrial phenotypes (Dimmer et al., 2002; Itoh et al., 2002, 2004), indicating that neither protein on its own is sufficient to act as a mitochondrial Myo2 receptor. Moreover, it has not been demonstrated whether Ypt11 and Mmr1 are directly required for interaction of mitochondria with the cytoskeleton. As Ypt11 does not seem to associate with mitochondria (Itoh et al., 2002, 2004), it appears that additional, yet unknown proteins are involved in anchoring Myo2 to the mitochondrial surface.
Boldogh et al. (2001a) have proposed an alternative mechanism to explain mitochondrial motility in budding yeast. They found that subunits of the Arp2/3 complex, the cell's most important initiator of actin polymerization, are located on the mitochondrial surface and that mitochondrial motility is impaired when actin dynamics are perturbed. These observations raised the possibility that mitochondria might move by an actin polymerization–dependent mechanism similar to the intracellular movement of certain bacterial pathogens, such as Listeria monocytogenes (Boldogh et al., 2001a, 2006). However, actin-dependent movement of mitochondria differs from other actin polymerization–dependent motility processes in an important aspect: mitochondrial movement occurs along preexisting actin cables (Fehrenbacher et al., 2004), whereas intracellular bacterial pathogens and endocytic membranes are propelled by growth of a newly generated comet-like actin tail (Kaksonen et al., 2006; Stevens et al., 2006). Moreover, it is difficult to reconcile this model with our observations that Myo2 is required for interaction of mitochondria with actin filaments in vitro, and that anterograde mitochondrial movement and entry into the bud is impaired in cargo binding–defective myo2 mutants in vivo. Thus, we consider it unlikely that Arp2/3 complex–dependent actin polymerization is the main mechanism mediating mitochondrial motility in yeast. Recent evidence suggests that somewhat redundant mechanisms for mitochondrial movement have evolved in fungi. For example, microtubule-dependent transport of mitochondria in the filamentous fungus Neurospora crassa is mediated by an evolutionarily conserved kinesin-related motor protein. When this motor is lacking, expression of an unconventional fungi-specific kinesin that replaces its function is induced (Fuchs and Westermann, 2005). In analogy, we consider it possible that Myo2 is the major transporter of mitochondria in yeast, and actin polymerization–driven motility might contribute to a minor extent.
Our work establishes for the first time a direct role of Myo2 as a motor protein moving mitochondria in yeast. Some observations reported in the literature provide evidence for an involvement of myosin-related proteins in mitochondrial motility in other organisms also. A putative unconventional myosin has been detected on motile mitochondria in locust photoreceptors (Stürmer and Baumann, 1998), partitioning of mitochondria and other organelles during spermatogenesis is defective in Caenorhabditis elegans class VI myosin mutants (Kelleher et al., 2000), and a plant-specific class XI myosin was found to colocalize with mitochondria and chloroplasts in maize cells (Wang and Pesacreta, 2004). Interestingly, cellular fractionation experiments and immunoelectron microscopy revealed that a class V myosin encoded by the dilute gene is associated with mitochondria in mammalian melanoma cells (Nascimento et al., 1997). Thus, it will be interesting to see in the future whether yeast and mammalian cells use similar mechanisms to mediate actin-dependent mitochondrial motility.
|
Materials and methods |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionResultsDiscussionMaterials and methodsReferences |
|---|
Staining of cellular structures
To visualize mitochondria, yeast strains were transformed with plasmid pYX142-mtGFP (Westermann and Neupert, 2000). mtDNA nucleoids were stained in methanol-fixed cells according to published procedures (Jones and Fangman, 1992). The actin cytoskeleton was stained with rhodamine phalloidin (Invitrogen) as described previously (Amberg, 1998).
Microscopy
Electron microscopy of yeast cells (Dürr et al., 2006) and isolated mitochondria (Meeusen et al., 2004) was performed as described previously. Differential interference contrast (DIC) and epifluorescence microscopy was performed using a microscope (Axioplan 2; Carl Zeiss, Inc.) equipped with a Plan-Neofluar 100x 1.30 NA Ph3 oil objective (Carl Zeiss, Inc.). Samples were embedded in 1% low-melting-point agarose and observed at room temperature. Images were recorded with a monochrome camera (Evolution VF Mono Cooled; Intas Science Imaging Instruments GmbH) and processed with Image Pro Plus 5.0 and Scope Pro 4.5 software (Media Cybernetics, Inc.). CorelDRAW graphics suite version 12.0 (Corel Corporation) was used for mounting of the figures; image manipulations other than minor adjustments of brightness and contrast were not performed.
For time-lapse live cell microscopy, cells were grown in glucose-containing minimal medium to early logarithmic growth phase and transferred to a percolation chamber that was constantly flushed with fresh medium and kept at ambient temperature. Cells were mounted in 1% low-melting-point agarose to inhibit spatial movements of the cells. For image acquisition, a beam-scanning confocal microscope (TCS SP2; Leica) equipped with a Plan-apo 63x 1.2 NA water immersion lens (Leica) was used. Images were averaged fourfold. Displayed are maximal intensity projections of 3D data stacks. Except smoothing and contrast stretching using the image acquisition software Imspector (Max-Planck-Innovation GmbH), no further image processing was applied.
Analysis of mitochondria–actin interactions in vitro
Phalloidin-stabilized actin filaments were prepared by polymerizing nonmuscular human actin (Tebu-Bio GmbH) according to the manufacturer's instructions. To fluorescently label actin filaments, 15 µg of Alexa Fluor 568–labeled actin (Invitrogen) was mixed with 100 µg of nonlabeled actin before polymerization.
For actin/mitochondria cosedimentation, isolated mitochondria were further purified by sucrose density gradient centrifugation as described previously (Altmann et al., 2007). The purity of representative mitochondria preparations was checked by electron microscopy (Fig. S2, available at http://www.jcb.org/cgi/content/full/jcb.200709099/DC1). Preparation of salt-washed mitochondria and mitochondrial salt extracts (Boldogh et al., 1998), binding of filamentous actin (at a concentration of 100 µg/ml) to purified mitochondria, and cosedimentation of actin with mitochondria (Lazzarino et al., 1994) were performed according to published procedures. Affinity-purified Myo2 antibodies used for pretreatment of isolated mitochondria were a gift from L.S. Weisman (University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI). Actin was detected by immunoblotting with monoclonal PanActin Ab-5 antibodies (Thermo Fisher Scientific), and mitochondria were detected with polyclonal Tom40 antibodies (a gift from D. Rapaport, Universität Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany). ECL-generated bands were quantified by densitometry using Scion Image software (Scion Corporation).
For visualization of actin–mitochondria interactions, 200 µg of mitochondria isolated from strains expressing mtGFP were incubated with 2.25 µg of fluorescently labeled actin filaments in 50 µl RM buffer (0.6 M sorbitol, 20 mM Hepes/KOH, pH 7.4, 2 mM MgCl2, 0.1 M KCl, 1 mg/ml of fatty acid–free bovine serum albumin, protease inhibitor cocktail, and 1 mM PMSF). To assay ATP sensitivity, either 50 U/ml apyrase (–ATP) or 2 mM ATP, 0.1 mg/ml creatine kinase, and 10 mM creatine phosphate (+ATP) were added. Samples were incubated for 10 min at 30°C, embedded in low-melting-point agarose, and observed by fluorescence microscopy.
Online supplemental material
Fig. S1 shows cross sections of complete wild-type and TetO7-myo2 cells analyzed by electron microscopy. Fig. S2 shows preparations of purified wild-type and TetO7-myo2 mitochondria analyzed by electron microscopy. Online supplemental material is available at http://www.jcb.org/cgi/content/full/jcb.200709099/DC1.
|
Acknowledgments |
|---|
This work was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (grant We 2174/3-2 and 3-3) and the Fonds der Chemischen Industrie.
Submitted: 17 September 2007
Accepted: 2 March 2008
|
References |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionResultsDiscussionMaterials and methodsReferences |
|---|
Altmann, K., and B. Westermann. 2005. Role of essential genes in mitochondrial morphogenesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Biol. Cell. 16:5410–5417.
Altmann, K., M. Dürr, and B. Westermann. 2007. Saccharomyces cerevisiae as a model organism to study mitochondrial biology: general considerations and basic procedures. Methods Mol. Biol. 372:81–90.[Medline]
Amberg, D.C. 1998. Three-dimensional imaging of the yeast actin cytoskeleton through the budding cell cycle. Mol. Biol. Cell. 9:3259–3262.
Bereiter-Hahn, J. 1990. Behavior of mitochondria in the living cell. Int. Rev. Cytol. 122:1–63.[Medline]
Berger, K.H., and M.P. Yaffe. 2000. Mitochondrial DNA inheritance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Trends Microbiol. 8:508–513.[CrossRef][Medline]
Boldogh, I.R., and L.A. Pon. 2006. Interactions of mitochondria with the actin cytoskeleton. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1763:450–462.[Medline]
Boldogh, I., N. Vojtov, S. Karmon, and L.A. Pon. 1998. Interaction between mitochondria and the actin cytoskeleton in budding yeast requires two integral mitochondrial outer membrane proteins, Mmm1p and Mdm10p. J. Cell Biol. 141:1371–1381.
Boldogh, I.R., H.-C. Yang, W.D. Nowakowski, S.L. Karmon, L.G. Hays, J.R. Yates III, and L.A. Pon. 2001a. Arp2/3 complex and actin dynamics are required for actin-based mitochondrial motility in yeast. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 98:3162–3167.
Boldogh, I.R., H.-C. Yang, and L.A. Pon. 2001b. Mitochondrial inheritance in budding yeast. Traffic. 2:368–374.[CrossRef][Medline]
Boldogh, I.R., S.L. Ramcharan, H.C. Yang, and L.A. Pon. 2004. A type V myosin (Myo2p) and a Rab-like G-protein (Ypt11p) are required for retention of newly inherited mitochondria in yeast cells during cell division. Mol. Biol. Cell. 15:3994–4002.
Brachmann, C.B., A. Davies, G.J. Cost, E. Caputo, J. Li, P. Hieter, and J.D. Boeke. 1998. Designer deletion strains derived from Saccharomyces cerevisiae S288C: a useful set of strains and plasmids for PCR-mediated gene disruption and other applications. Yeast. 14:115–132.[CrossRef][Medline]
Burke, D., D. Dawson, and T. Stearns. 2000. Methods in yeast genetics. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY. 205 pp.
Catlett, N.L., and L.S. Weisman. 1998. The terminal tail region of a yeast myosin-V mediates its attachment to vacuole membranes and sites of polarized growth. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 95:14799–14804.
Catlett, N.L., and L.S. Weisman. 2000. Divide and multiply: organelle partitioning in yeast. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 12:509–516.[CrossRef][Medline]
Catlett, N.L., J.E. Duex, F. Tang, and L.S. Weisman. 2000. Two distinct regions in a yeast myosin-V tail domain are required for the movement of different cargoes. J. Cell Biol. 150:513–526.
Chan, D.C. 2006. Mitochondria: dynamic organelles in disease, aging, and development. Cell. 125:1241–1252.[CrossRef][Medline]
Dimmer, K.S., and L. Scorrano. 2006. (De)constructing mitochondria: what for? Physiology (Bethesda). 21:233–241.[CrossRef][Medline]
Dimmer, K.S., S. Fritz, F. Fuchs, M. Messerschmitt, N. Weinbach, W. Neupert, and B. Westermann. 2002. Genetic basis of mitochondrial function and morphology in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Biol. Cell. 13:847–853.
Dimmer, K.S., S. Jakobs, F. Vogel, K. Altmann, and B. Westermann. 2005. Mdm31 and Mdm32 are inner membrane proteins required for maintenance of mitochondrial shape and stability of mitochondrial DNA nucleoids in yeast. J. Cell Biol. 168:103–115.
Drubin, D.G., H.D. Jones, and K.F. Wertman. 1993. Actin structure and function: roles in mitochondrial organization and morphogenesis in budding yeast and identification of the phalloidin binding site. Mol. Biol. Cell. 4:1277–1294.[Abstract]
Dürr, M., M. Escobar-Henriques, S. Merz, S. Geimer, T. Langer, and B. Westermann. 2006. Nonredundant roles of mitochondria-associated F-box proteins Mfb1 and Mdm30 in maintenance of mitochondrial morphology in yeast. Mol. Biol. Cell. 17:3745–3755.
Fehrenbacher, K.L., H.C. Yang, A.C. Gay, T.M. Huckaba, and L.A. Pon. 2004. Live cell imaging of mitochondrial movement along actin cables in budding yeast. Curr. Biol. 14:1996–2004.[CrossRef][Medline]
Frederick, R.L., and J.M. Shaw. 2007. Moving mitochondria: establishing distribution of an essential organelle. Traffic. 8:1668–1675.[CrossRef][Medline]
Fuchs, F., and B. Westermann. 2005. Role of Unc104/KIF1-related motor proteins in mitochondrial transport in Neurospora crassa. Mol. Biol. Cell. 16:153–161.
Gari, E., L. Piedrafita, M. Aldea, and E. Herrero. 1997. A set of vectors with a tetracycline-regulatable promoter system for modulated gene expression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast. 13:837–848.[CrossRef][Medline]
Giaever, G., A.M. Chu, L. Ni, C. Connelly, L. Riles, S. Veronneau, S. Dow, A. Lucau-Danila, K. Anderson, B. Andre, et al. 2002. Functional profiling of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome. Nature. 418:387–391.[CrossRef][Medline]
Goodson, H.V., B.L. Anderson, H.M. Warrick, L.A. Pon, and J.A. Spudich. 1996. Synthetic lethality screen identifies a novel yeast myosin I gene (MYO5): myosin I proteins are required for polarization of the actin cytoskeleton. J. Cell Biol. 133:1277–1291.
Hermann, G.J., and J.M. Shaw. 1998. Mitochondrial dynamics in yeast. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 14:265–303.[CrossRef][Medline]
Hermann, G.J., E.J. King, and J.M. Shaw. 1997. The yeast gene, MDM20, is necessary for mitochondrial inheritance and organization of the actin cytoskeleton. J. Cell Biol. 137:141–153.
Hoppins, S., L. Lackner, and J. Nunnari. 2007. The machines that divide and fuse mitochondria. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 76:751–780.[CrossRef][Medline]
Itoh, T., A. Watabe, A. Toh-e, and Y. Matsui. 2002. Complex formation with Ypt11p, a rab-type small GTPase, is essential to facilitate the function of Myo2p, a class V myosin, in mitochondrial distribution in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 22:7744–7757.
Itoh, T., A. Toh-e, and Y. Matsui. 2004. Mmr1p is a mitochondrial factor for Myo2p-dependent inheritance of mitochondria in the budding yeast. EMBO J. 23:2520–2530.[CrossRef][Medline]
Jensen, R.E., A.E. Aiken Hobbs, K.L. Cerveny, and H. Sesaki. 2000. Yeast mitochondrial dynamics: fusion, division, segregation, and shape. Microsc. Res. Tech. 51:573–583.[CrossRef][Medline]
Jones, B.A., and W.L. Fangman. 1992. Mitochondrial DNA maintenance in yeast requires a protein containing a region related to the GTP-binding domain of dynamin. Genes Dev. 6:380–389.
Kaksonen, M., C.P. Toret, and D.G. Drubin. 2006. Harnessing actin dynamics for clathrin-mediated endocytosis. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 7:404–414.[CrossRef][Medline]
Kelleher, J.F., M.A. Mandell, G. Moulder, K.L. Hill, S.W. L'Hernault, R. Barstead, and M.A. Titus. 2000. Myosin VI is required for asymmetric segregation of cellular components during C. elegans spermatogenesis. Curr. Biol. 10:1489–1496.[CrossRef][Medline]
Lazzarino, D.A., I. Boldogh, M.G. Smith, J. Rosand, and L.A. Pon. 1994. Yeast mitochondria contain ATP-sensitive, reversible actin-binding activity. Mol. Biol. Cell. 5:807–818.[Abstract]
Luo, J., E.A. Vallen, C. Dravis, S.E. Tcheperegine, B. Drees, and E. Bi. 2004. Identification and functional analysis of the essential and regulatory light chains of the only type II myosin Myo1p in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Cell Biol. 165:843–855.
Meeusen, S., J.M. McCaffery, and J. Nunnari. 2004. Mitochondrial fusion intermediates revealed in vitro. Science. 305:1747–1752.
Merz, S., M. Hammermeister, K. Altmann, M. Dürr, and B. Westermann. 2007. Molecular machinery of mitochondrial dynamics in yeast. Biol. Chem. 388:917–926.[CrossRef][Medline]
Mnaimneh, S., A.P. Davierwala, J. Haynes, J. Moffat, W.T. Peng, W. Zhang, X. Yang, J. Pootoolal, G. Chua, A. Lopez, et al. 2004. Exploration of essential gene functions via titratable promoter alleles. Cell. 118:31–44.[CrossRef][Medline]
Nascimento, A.A., R.G. Amaral, J.C. Bizario, R.E. Larson, and E.M. Espreafico. 1997. Subcellular localization of myosin-V in the B16 melanoma cells, a wild-type cell line for the dilute gene. Mol. Biol. Cell. 8:1971–1988.
Nunnari, J., and P. Walter. 1996. Regulation of organelle biogenesis. Cell. 84:389–394.[CrossRef][Medline]
Okamoto, K., and J.M. Shaw. 2005. Mitochondrial morphology and dynamics in yeast and multicellular eukaryotes. Annu. Rev. Genet. 39:503–536.[CrossRef][Medline]
Pashkova, N., N.L. Catlett, J.L. Novak, G. Wu, R. Lu, R.E. Cohen, and L.S. Weisman. 2005. Myosin V attachment to cargo requires the tight association of two functional subdomains. J. Cell Biol. 168:359–364.
Pashkova, N., Y. Jin, S. Ramaswamy, and L.S. Weisman. 2006. Structural basis for myosin V discrimination between distinct cargoes. EMBO J. 25:693–700.[CrossRef][Medline]
Pruyne, D., A. Legesse-Miller, L. Gao, Y. Dong, and A. Bretscher. 2004. Mechanisms of polarized growth and organelle segregation in yeast. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 20:559–591.[CrossRef][Medline]
Reck-Peterson, S.L., D.W. Provance Jr., M.S. Mooseker, and J.A. Mercer. 2000. Class V myosins. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1496:36–51.[Medline]
Schott, D., J. Ho, D. Pruyne, and A. Bretscher. 1999. The COOH-terminal domain of Myo2p, a yeast myosin V, has a direct role in secretory vesicle targeting. J. Cell Biol. 147:791–808.
Shaw, J.M., and J. Nunnari. 2002. Mitochondrial dynamics and division in budding yeast. Trends Cell Biol. 12:178–184.[CrossRef][Medline]
Simon, V.R., T.C. Swayne, and L.A. Pon. 1995. Actin-dependent mitochondrial motility in mitotic yeast and cell-free systems: identification of a motor activity on the mitochondrial surface. J. Cell Biol. 130:345–354.
Simon, V.R., S.L. Karmon, and L.A. Pon. 1997. Mitochondrial inheritance: cell cycle and actin cable dependence of polarized mitochondrial movements in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Cell Motil. Cytoskeleton. 37:199–210.[CrossRef][Medline]
Singer, J.M., G.J. Hermann, and J.M. Shaw. 2000. Suppressors of mdm20 in yeast identify new alleles of ACT1 and TPM1 predicted to enhance actin-tropomyosin interactions. Genetics. 156:523–534.
Smith, M.G., V.R. Simon, H. O'Sullivan, and L.A. Pon. 1995. Organelle-cytoskeletal interactions: actin mutations inhibit meiosis-dependent mitochondrial rearrangement in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Biol. Cell. 6:1381–1396.[Abstract]
Stevens, R.C., and T.N. Davis. 1998. Mlc1p is a light chain for the unconventional myosin Myo2p in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Cell Biol. 142:711–722.
Stevens, J.M., E.E. Galyov, and M.P. Stevens. 2006. Actin-dependent movement of bacterial pathogens. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 4:91–101.[CrossRef][Medline]
Stürmer, K., and O. Baumann. 1998. Immunolocalization of a putative unconventional myosin on the surface of motile mitochondria in locust photoreceptors. Cell Tissue Res. 292:219–227.[CrossRef][Medline]
Wang, Z., and T.C. Pesacreta. 2004. A subclass of myosin XI is associated with mitochondria, plastids, and the molecular chaperone subunit TCP-1alpha in maize. Cell Motil. Cytoskeleton. 57:218–232.[CrossRef][Medline]
Warren, G., and W. Wickner. 1996. Organelle inheritance. Cell. 84:395–400.[CrossRef][Medline]
Westermann, B. 2003. Mitochondrial membrane fusion. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1641:195–202.[Medline]
Westermann, B., and W. Neupert. 2000. Mitochondria-targeted green fluorescent proteins: convenient tools for the study of organelle biogenesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast. 16:1421–1427.[CrossRef][Medline]
Winsor, B., and E. Schiebel. 1997. Review: an overview of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae microtubule and microfilament cytoskeleton. Yeast. 13:399–434.[CrossRef][Medline]
Yaffe, M.P. 1999. The machinery of mitochondrial inheritance and behavior. Science. 283:1493–1497.
Yang, H.C., A. Palazzo, T.C. Swayne, and L.A. Pon. 1999. A retention mechanism for distribution of mitochondria during cell division in budding yeast. Curr. Biol. 9:1111–1114.[CrossRef][Medline]
CiteULike 
Complore 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us 
Digg 
Facebook 
Reddit 
Technorati 
Twitter What's this?
Related Article
Related In this Issue article
This article has been cited by other articles:
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
