JCB logo
CrossRef
  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents

Published online
doi:10.1083/jcb.1812rr1
The Journal of Cell Biology, Vol. 181, No. 2, 177-
The Rockefeller University Press, 0021-9525 $30.00
© Robinson
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF, 820K)
Right arrow PPT slides of all figures
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Services
Right arrow Email this article
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new content in the JCB
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Robinson, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Robinson, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Research Roundup

Pack loose, grow long



Figure 1
MSP filaments pack more loosely as they elongate away from the site of polymerization (top).

ROBERTS/NAS

Longer cytoskeletal rods have more empty space between them, and that space helps drive amoeboid cell motility, say Thomas Roberts (Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL) and colleagues.

Theories of amoeboid-like cell movement have largely relied on cytoskeleton polymerization to explain membrane protrusion. But in studying filaments of the worm major sperm protein (MSP) using electron tomography, the authors noted that filaments became more loosely packed as they elongated.

"Polymer physicists have known for a long time that shorter rods pack more tightly," says Roberts. By contrast, longer rods, regardless of composition, enclose more empty space. Measurements from the new images were consistent with this effect, and simulations confirmed that growing rods exhibited the same length-dependent space constraints as static ones. An MSP mutant that polymerized 2.4 times more slowly reduced the protrusion rate by 3.4-fold, indicating that both polymerization and packing-based expansion contribute to protrusion.

"It's plausible that this effect may occur in actin systems as well," says Roberts, although actin-based protrusion differs in its molecular details, including the use of cross-linking proteins. Formula

Miao, L., et al. 2008. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. doi:10.1073/pnas.0708416105.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



Richard Robinson

rrobinson{at}nasw.org


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF, 820K)
Right arrow PPT slides of all figures
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Services
Right arrow Email this article
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new content in the JCB
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Robinson, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Robinson, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?


  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents