JCB logo
Quantitative Colocalization Analysis Software
  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents

Published online
doi:10.1083/jcb.1816iti2
The Journal of Cell Biology, Vol. 181, No. 6, 875-
The Rockefeller University Press, 0021-9525 $30.00
© Robinson
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF, 1149K)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Services
Right arrow Email this article
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new content in the JCB
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Robinson, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Robinson, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

In This Issue

A better way to see splicing partners


Splicing factor interactions have been well-characterized in vitro, but less so in vivo. Ellis et al. have now used live cell imaging techniques to study these interactions in vivo and to discover where in the nucleus they occur.

Coimmunoprecipitation can't capture the dynamic nature of protein interactions, and the resolution of conventional fluorescence microscopy is too poor to distinguish truly interacting proteins from ones that are merely close to each other. In contrast, a positive FRET (fluorescence resonance energy transfer) signal implies two proteins are close enough to interact, and photobleaching or FLIM (fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy) can detect changes in an interacting pair over time.

Using these techniques, the authors confirmed that the splice site protein, SF2/ASF, and the 5' splice site factor, U1 70K, interact in a type of nuclear body called a "speckle" and, to a lesser extent, in the nucleoplasm. When transcription was blocked, nucleoplasmic, but not speckle-localized, interactions were diminished. This finding bolsters the case for speckles as storage or assembly sites for splicing factors rather than sites of transcription-associated splicing.

The same localization and response to transcription inhibition was seen for interactions between SF2/ASF and the 3' splice site binder, U2AF35. But apparently not all splicing factors accumulate in speckles: interactions between HCC1 and either U2AF35 or U2AF65 were most prominent in the nucleoplasm, even when transcription was blocked.

There is clearly still much to uncover about splicing factor interactions in vivo, but by using FLIM-FRET, the authors have a powerful tool to dig deeper. Formula

Ellis, J.D., et al. 2008. J. Cell Biol. doi:10.1083/jcb.200710051.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



Richard Robinson

rrobinson{at}nasw.org


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF, 1149K)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Services
Right arrow Email this article
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new content in the JCB
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Robinson, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Robinson, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?


  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents