JCB logo
  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents

Published online
doi:10.1083/jcb.1821iti3
The Journal of Cell Biology, Vol. 182, No. 1, 2-3
The Rockefeller University Press, 0021-9525 $30.00
© Robinson
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF, 913K)
Right arrow PPT slides of all figures
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Services
Right arrow Email this article
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new content in the JCB
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Robinson, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Robinson, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

In This Issue

PEGGING MITOCHONDRIAL POSITION



Figure 1
Mitochondria (green) in Peg1 mutants aggregate (left), whereas wild-type mitochondria are more spread out (right).

Mitochondria need microtubule-binding proteins for proper positioning, say Chiron et al.

Mitochondria rely on microtubules to move around the cell and for distribution into daughter cells. Many cell types use microtubule-bound motors to move mitochondria. Yeast cells instead depend on microtubule growth to do the job, but how mitochondria are lashed onto the growing microtubules was unknown.

In normal yeast cells, mitochondria are evenly distributed throughout the cell. In a screen of temperature-sensitive yeast mutants, the authors discovered one in which mitochondria aggregated at the ends of the cell, a phenomenon that also occurs when microtubules depolymerize. The mutant gene that caused this phenotype was peg1, which encodes a homologue of the mammalian microtubule plus end–binding protein CLASP.

Mitochondrial aggregation could not be recapitulated by mutants of either the motor protein dynein or other plus end–binding proteins. The Peg1 mutation did not affect the cytoskeleton, and the changes were independent of the cell cycle, suggesting the aggregation was not due to other changes in microtubules.

Peg1 was found to be a mitochondrial peripheral membrane protein. As CLASP links membranes to microtubules in mammalian cells, Chiron proposes a similar function for Peg1 in yeast, and suggests that it hitches mitochondria to microtubules.

Chiron, S., et al. 2008. J. Cell Biol. doi:10.1083/jcb.200712147.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



Richard Robinson

rrobinson{at}nasw.org


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF, 913K)
Right arrow PPT slides of all figures
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Services
Right arrow Email this article
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new content in the JCB
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Robinson, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Robinson, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?


  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents