JCB logo
amgmicro.com
  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents

Published online
doi:10.1083/jcb.1843iti2
The Journal of Cell Biology, Vol. 184, No. 3, 338-
The Rockefeller University Press, 0021-9525 $30.00
© Short
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF, 746K)
Right arrow PPT slides of all figures
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Services
Right arrow Email this article
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new content in the JCB
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Short, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Short, B.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

In This Issue

Cell cycle keeps Fus2p in check before yeast mate



Figure 1
Fus2p (green) localizes to the nucleus (left) until after cell division, when it moves to the mating cell tips (right).

Ydenberg and Rose show that yeast cells use both pheromone signaling and the cell cycle to ensure that a protein important for mating only operates at the right time and place.

When haploid yeast cells sense pheromones from an opposite mating type, they differentiate by inducing expression of mating-specific genes, arresting in the G1 phase of the cell cycle, and sending out protrusions called "shmoos" toward the source of the pheromone. One induced protein, Fus2p, initially localizes to the nucleus but moves to the shmoo tip after cell cycle arrest to mediate mating-cell fusion. Fus2p's expression and localization depends on the pheromone-activated MAP kinase Fus3p. But how Fus3p targets Fus2p to the shmoo tip, and why this only occurs after G1 arrest was unknown.

Ydenberg and Rose found that Fus3p directly phosphorylated Fus2p to promote its localization to the cytoplasm, but Fus2p always remained nuclear until after cell division. The cell cycle–regulated, cyclin-dependent kinase Cdc28p modulates the yeast response to pheromones, so the authors reasoned that it might control Fus2p's whereabouts by counteracting Fus3p. Indeed, they found that Cdc28p opposes Fus3p in two different ways, depending on which stage of the cell cycle the yeast are at.

In late G1 and S phase, it was already known that Cdc28p prevented the activation of Fus3p by pheromones. Later in the cell cycle, at G2/M phase, pheromone signaling and Fus3p were fully active but Cdc28p still prevented Fus2p from exiting the nucleus by an unknown mechanism. Only after cell division and G1 arrest was Cdc28p activity low enough for Fus3p to promote Fus2p's redistribution to the cytoplasm and shmoo tip.

Why do yeast regulate Fus2p's localization using both pheromone and cell cycle–regulated pathways? Ydenberg and Rose think that it may be vital for Fus2p to remain sequestered in the nucleus until after cell division so that it can't interfere with cytokinesis: Fus2p is likely to be an activator of Rho GTPases, so localizing it to the wrong place at the wrong time might have disastrous consequences for the cell. Differentiating cells in higher eukaryotes face similar problems as they turn on genes not normally expressed during the mitotic cycle. To safely differentiate, the authors suspect that other eukaryotes have evolved similar solutions to those used by mating yeast.


References

Ydenberg, C.A., and M.D. Rose. 2009. J. Cell Biol. doi:10.1083/jcb.200809066.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



Ben Short

bshort{at}rockefeller.edu


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?

Related Article

Antagonistic regulation of Fus2p nuclear localization by pheromone signaling and the cell cycle
Casey A. Ydenberg and Mark D. Rose
J. Cell Biol. 2009 184: 409-422. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF, 746K)
Right arrow PPT slides of all figures
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Services
Right arrow Email this article
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new content in the JCB
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Short, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Short, B.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?


  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents