JCB logo
  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents

Published online
doi:10.1083/jcb.1844iti4
The Journal of Cell Biology, Vol. 184, No. 4, 465-
The Rockefeller University Press, 0021-9525 $30.00
© Williams
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF, 1190K)
Right arrow PPT slides of all figures
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Services
Right arrow Email this article
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new content in the JCB
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Williams, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Williams, R.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

In This Issue

Tankyrase: A new breed of telomere security guard



Figure 1
Tankyrase 1 deficiency can prompt sister telomere fusion (arrowheads).

At mitosis, a protein called tankyrase 1 serves as protector by separating sister chromatid strands to prevent their telomeres from fusing, conclude Hsiao and Smith.

The team had previously shown that cells lacking tankyrase 1 arrest at mitosis when their sister chromatid telomeres remain associated via protein-protein interactions—even though normal separation occurs along the rest of the chromatid pair. That work highlighted the unique nature of telomere cohesion and led the team to investigate more closely how and why tankyrase 1 prompts telomere separation.

For the how, the team's studies indicate that tankyrase prompts the removal of a telomere-specific TIN2/TRF1 complex that binds to chromatid cohesion proteins. As for the why, the authors demonstrate that promoting sister telomere separation prevents their fusion. After DNA replication, telomeres are processed to generate 3' overhangs that form protective t loop structures by strand invasion. If chromatid separation does not occur, the DNA ends are at risk of invading the sister strand, and end joining. Indeed, many of the unseparated telomeres in tankyrase-lacking cells were fused together (by nonhomologous end joining). The team would now like to dissect the timing of 3' end processing and sister telomere separation to understand when tankyrase 1 acts. RW


References

Hsiao, S.J., and S. Smith. 2009. J. Cell Biol. doi:10.1083/jcb.200810132.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



Ruth Williams

ruth.williams{at}rockefeller.edu


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?

Related Article

Sister telomeres rendered dysfunctional by persistent cohesion are fused by NHEJ
Susan J. Hsiao and Susan Smith
J. Cell Biol. 2009 184: 515-526. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF, 1190K)
Right arrow PPT slides of all figures
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Services
Right arrow Email this article
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new content in the JCB
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Williams, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Williams, R.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?


  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents