JCB logo
Accuri Cytometers
  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents

Published online
doi:10.1083/jcb.1857iti3
The Journal of Cell Biology, Vol. 185, No. 7, 1130-
The Rockefeller University Press, 0021-9525 $30.00
© Short
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF, 509K)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Services
Right arrow Email this article
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new content in the JCB
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Short, B.
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Short, B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

In This Issue

Fibronectin is a good catch for integrin


Kong et al. find a touch of romance in the engagement between integrin adhesion receptors and their extracellular matrix ligands. The more life tries to pull them apart, the more they want to stay together.

As a cell crawls along, integrin heterodimers bind extracellular matrix molecules such as fibronectin and help the cell gain traction. You might expect that the harder the integrin–fibronectin bond is pulled, the more likely it is to break. But some types of molecular bond—called catch bonds—actually grow stronger as more force is applied to them.

Researchers have long speculated that integrins might display this unusual behavior, but experiments measuring the forces that disrupt integrin–ligand interactions failed to find any evidence of catch bonds. Kong et al. took a slightly different approach. They used atomic force microscopy to measure how long individual bonds between {alpha}5β1 integrin and fibronectin lasted when pulled apart with constant forces. As the pulling force increased, the {alpha}5β1–fibronectin association lasted longer, indicating that the molecules do form catch bonds.

The increased force might induce a conformational change in the proteins that locks the bond tighter. Kong et al. provide evidence that this switch occurs in the extracellular head domain of {alpha}5β1. Senior author Cheng Zhu, however, speculates that such a conformational change could be propagated across the plasma membrane to the integrin's tail, altering its association with the cytoskeleton and downstream signaling molecules. Force-induced changes in adhesion strength and signaling may help cells migrate and respond to their local environment.


References

Kong, F., et al. 2009. J. Cell Biol. doi:10.1083/jcb.200810002.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



Ben Short

bshort{at}rockefeller.edu


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF, 509K)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Services
Right arrow Email this article
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new content in the JCB
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Short, B.
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Short, B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?


  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents