|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Index of Online Supplemental Material for
J. Cell Biol. 10.1083/jcb.200305142
Wang et al.
• Figure S1 Histogram representing the minimal locus-PML distances for TAP/LMP and PSMB4.
• Figure S2 The association of PML bodies with loci in close proximity with each other.
• Figure S3 Linear regression graphs comparing the percentage of loci in direct contact with PML bodies.
• Figure S4 The effect of knock-down and formation of new PML bodies on transcription levels.
• Figure S5 The association of PML bodies with genes encoding proteins of different functions.
• Figure S6 Comparison of locus-PML associations relative to the positions of the loci within their chromosome territories.
• Table S1 Analysis of associations of different loci with PML bodies (mmd-locus), with closest (as measured via mmd) associations shown first
• Table S2 Comparison of different loci in cells treated with IFNg vs. untreated MRC5 fibroblast cells
• Table S3 Comparing the direct contact of loci with PML bodies and the location of the locus signal relative to the chromosome territory
• Table S4 List of genes analyzed with their BAC/PAC probes and primers designed against the corresponding mRNA sequences
• Table S5 List of genes analyzed quantitative real-time PCR with primers designed against the corresponding mRNA sequences
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
