Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Newest Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Archive
    • Subject Collections
    • Special Collections
  • Reviews & Opinions
    • Editorials
    • People & Ideas
    • Spotlights
    • Viewpoints
    • Inside Look
    • Reviews
    • biosights podcast
  • Alerts
  • About
    • History
    • Editors & Staff
    • Permissions & Licensing
    • Advertise
    • Contact Us
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Publication Fees
    • Author Services
  • Subscriptions
  • Rockefeller University Press
  • JCB
  • JEM
  • JGP
  • LSA

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
JCB
  • Rockefeller University Press
  • JCB
  • JEM
  • JGP
  • LSA
  • Log in
JCB

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Newest Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Archive
    • Subject Collections
    • Special Collections
  • Reviews & Opinions
    • Editorials
    • People & Ideas
    • Spotlights
    • Viewpoints
    • Inside Look
    • Reviews
    • biosights podcast
  • Alerts
  • About
    • History
    • Editors & Staff
    • Permissions & Licensing
    • Advertise
    • Contact Us
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Publication Fees
    • Author Services
  • Subscriptions

You are here

jcb Home » 2000 Archive » 24 July » 150 (2): F23
Analysis

A Survey of Human Disease Gene Counterparts in the Drosophila Genome

Mark E. Fortini, Marian P. Skupski, Mark S. Boguski, Iswar K. Hariharan
Mark E. Fortini
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Marian P. Skupski
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mark S. Boguski
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Iswar K. Hariharan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1083/jcb.150.2.F23 | Published July 24, 2000
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info
  • Metrics
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1

    InterPro alignment of VWF to the protein that it most resembles in the Drosophila genome. Representation of domains of the human VWF protein and the most similar predicted Drosophila protein (not drawn to scale). The Drosophila ORF with the best sequence similarity to human VWF (bottom) has several VWF-C domains (black), a VWF-D domain (gray), and a very low E value when aligned to human VWF (top). However, it has no VWF-A domains (white), which bind GPIIb, collagen and heparin, and are crucial for the function of the human protein. Thus the Drosophila predicted protein is unlikely to represent a true homologue of human VWF.

  • Figure 2
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2

    Alignment of the human and Drosophila Menin proteins. The human (bottom line) and Drosophila (top line) Menin proteins were aligned using the MacVector 6.5 ClustalW program with the BLOSUM 30 matrix and an open gap penalty of 10. The fly protein is 34% identical and 47% similar to the human protein over its entire length.

  • Figure 3
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3

    Alignment of the human and Drosophila Peutz-Jeghers STK11 kinases. The human (bottom line) and Drosophila (top line) Peutz-Jeghers disease STK11 kinases were aligned using the MacVector 6.5 ClustalW program with the BLOSUM 30 matrix and an open gap penalty of 10. The fly protein is 43% identical and 56% similar to the human protein over its entire length.

Tables

  • Figures
  • Table 1
Previous articleNext article
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
A Survey of Human Disease Gene Counterparts in the Drosophila Genome
Mark E. Fortini, Marian P. Skupski, Mark S. Boguski, Iswar K. Hariharan
The Journal of Cell Biology Jul 2000, 150 (2) F23-F30; DOI: 10.1083/jcb.150.2.F23

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address

Email logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo Reddit logo CiteULike logo LinkedIn logo
The Journal of Cell Biology: 218 (2)

Current Issue

February 4, 2019
Volume 218, No. 2

  • Table of Contents
  • All Issues

Jump To

  • Article
    • Survey Design and Methodology
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info
  • Metrics
  • Preview PDF
 

ARTICLES

  • Current Issue
  • Newest Articles
  • Archive
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds

FOR AUTHORS

  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Instructions for Authors

ABOUT

  • About JCB
  • Editors & Staff
  • Permissions & Licensing
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Feedback
  • Newsroom
  • Privacy Policy

CONNECT WITH JCB

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • RSS
  • Instagram

Online ISSN: 1540-8140
Print ISSN: 0021-9525

Copyright © 2019 JCB by Rockefeller University Press