The spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC) ensures faithful chromosome segregation by delaying anaphase onset until all sister kinetochores are attached to bipolar spindles. An RNA interference screen for synthetic genetic interactors with a conserved SAC gene, san-1/MAD3, identified spdl-1, a Caenorhabditis elegans homologue of Spindly. SPDL-1 protein localizes to the kinetochore from prometaphase to metaphase, and this depends on KNL-1, a highly conserved kinetochore protein, and CZW-1/ZW10, a component of the ROD–ZW10–ZWILCH complex. In two-cell–stage embryos harboring abnormal monopolar spindles, SPDL-1 is required to induce the SAC-dependent mitotic delay and localizes the SAC protein MDF-1/MAD1 to the kinetochore facing away from the spindle pole. In addition, SPDL-1 coimmunoprecipitates with MDF-1/MAD1 in vivo. These results suggest that SPDL-1 functions in a kinetochore receptor of MDF-1/MAD1 to induce SAC function.

To ensure faithful chromosome segregation, the spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC) monitors the status of kinetochore–microtubule binding and inhibits activity of the anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome (APC/CCDC20), thereby delaying anaphase onset until all sister kinetochores have properly attached to bipolar mitotic spindles (for review see May and Hardwick, 2006; Musacchio and Salmon, 2007).

The SAC signaling pathway is mediated by highly conserved proteins such as MAD1-3, BUB1, and BUB3, first identified by two independent genetic screens in budding yeast (Hoyt et al., 1991; Li and Murray, 1991). These proteins temporally associate with kinetochores that have not achieved bipolar attachment. MAD1 specifically localizes and recruits MAD2 to microtubule-free kinetochores and facilitates binding of MAD2 and CDC20, an APC/C activator, thereby inhibiting APC/C (Sironi et al., 2001; De Antoni et al., 2005). However, how MAD1 is specifically targeted to unattached kinetochores is yet unanswered. In metazoan cells, the ROD–ZW10–ZWILCH (RZZ) complex is crucial in the SAC pathway (for review see Karess, 2005). The RZZ complex recruits dynein/dynactin to kinetochores (Starr et al., 1998). Although the RZZ complex is required to regulate levels of MAD1 and MAD2 at unattached kinetochores (Kops et al., 2005), it localizes to not only microtubule-free but also tension-free kinetochores (Famulski and Chan, 2007).

In Caenorhabditis elegans, MDF-1/MAD1 is required for SAC-dependent delay of mitotic progression induced by chemical or mutational disruption of microtubules in proliferating germ cells (Kitagawa and Rose, 1999) and early-stage embryogenesis (Nystul et al., 2003; Encalada et al., 2005). However, MDF-1 loss hardly affects cell cycle progression during early embryogenesis.

SAN-1/MAD3 is also essential for microtubule defect– or anoxia-induced mitotic delay in early-stage embryos (Nystul et al., 2003) but not for animal viability in C. elegans; deletion of san-1 causes no severe developmental defects (Stein et al., 2007). In contrast, despite being dispensable during early embryogenesis, C. elegans strains carrying deletion mutations in mdf-1 or mdf-2/MAD2 exhibit severe defects in larval and germ cell development (Kitagawa and Rose, 1999). Lethality of the mdf-1 deletion strain is suppressed by reduction of APC/C activity (Furuta et al., 2000; Kitagawa et al., 2002; Tarailo et al., 2007a), suggesting that MDF-1 regulates APC/CCDC20 activity during development. The defect in metaphase-to-anaphase transition in meiosis I caused by APC/C mutants can be suppressed by hypomorphic mutations in mdf-1, mdf-2, or san-1, suggesting that these SAC components are required to regulate APC/C activity during meiosis (Stein et al., 2007).

An RNAi-based genomewide screen for synthetic genetic interactors with known SAC components identified spdl-1, which is required to activate the SAC pathway, particularly MDF-1–mediated signaling pathways. Our findings suggest that SPDL-1 functions in the SAC pathway as a constituent of the kinetochore receptor for MDF-1 in C. elegans.

SPDL-1, identified as a san-1/MAD3 synthetic genetic interactor, is required for SAC activation

The RNAi screen for genes whose depletion caused phenotypes that were embryonic lethal or had reduced number of progeny in combination with san-1 deletion (san-1Δ) by using Ahringer's RNAi feeding library (Kamath et al., 2003) identified known components of spindles, kinetochore, and cohesion as well as other SAC components (unpublished data). Thus, san-1 synthetic lethal genes include genes whose depletion activates the SAC and those required for SAC activation. (To avoid confusion caused by the inconsistency of nomenclature among organisms, names for C. elegans genes used in this study are listed in Fig. S1 A.)

Uncharacterized san-1 synthetic lethal genes were further screened for genes whose depletion by RNAi bypasses the mitotic delay induced by ZYG-1 deficiency in two-cell–stage embryos (see Materials and methods). The mitotic delay in ZYG-1–depleted embryos was bypassed by codepletion of MDF-1 (Fig. 1 A), indicating the delay was SAC dependent. This secondary screen identified C06A8.5 (Fig. 1 A), which encodes a protein-sharing sequence similarity with Spindly family proteins (Fig. S1 B; Cheeseman and Desai, 2008). Although our finding that SAC activation needs C06A8.5 does not support that it behaves as an orthologue of Spindly, which silences the SAC rather than activating it (Griffis et al., 2007), we designated this gene spdl-1 as assigned by the Caenorhabditis Genetic Center to be consistent in gene naming.

RNAi of spdl-1 caused synthetic lethality with san-1Δ but did not affect viability of the mdf-1 mutant allele or the mdf-2Δ allele (Fig. S1 C). This result was in contrast to that obtained for other candidates of the screen, such as HCP-1, BUB-3, or GOA-1, whose depletion was synthetically lethal with not only san-1Δ but also the mutant allele of mdf-1 or mdf-2Δ (Fig. S1 C). MDF-1 depletion was also lethal with san-1Δ but not with the mdf-1 mutant or the mdf-2Δ allele (Fig. S1 C), suggesting that SPDL-1 functions in an MDF-1–mediated pathway.

RNAi by feeding the bacterial clone expressing spdl-1 double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) only partially depleted SPDL-1, with little effect on brood size or number of progeny of wild-type worms, but considerably reduced viability of progeny in the san-1Δ strain (Fig. S1 C). However, microinjection with spdl-1 dsRNA into gonad arms of wild-type adult hermaphrodites caused substantial reduction of SPDL-1 (Fig. S1 D) and the embryonic lethal phenotype at high penetrance (not depicted). Thus, SPDL-1 is indispensable for embryogenesis.

During chromosome segregation in embryos expressing GFP–histone H2B and GFP–β-tubulin, depletion of SPDL-1 caused severe chromosome missegregation at the first mitosis (Fig. 1 B). In SPDL-1–depleted embryos, chromosome congression was incomplete and sister chromatids being separated were often connected by lagging chromosomes. Regardless of the presence of lagging chromosomes, cytokinesis occurred at the same time as in untreated embryos (Fig. 1 C), leading to karyomere formation at a frequency similar to that reported previously (Sonnichsen et al., 2005). Time course analysis revealed that depletion of SPDL-1 induced rapid and premature centrosome separation, which reflects a defect in kinetochore–microtubule attachment (Fig. 1 C), suggesting that SPDL-1 plays a role in proper kinetochore–microtubule attachment in addition to the SAC function. However, the defect was less severe than that caused by depletion of NDC-80, a constituent of the core microtubule-binding site (Fig. 1 C; Desai et al., 2003).

We next tested the genetic interaction of SPDL-1 and the APC/C, the downstream target of the SAC. At 24°C, mat-3/APC8 temperature-sensitive allele, mat-3(or180) (referred to as mat-3ts), causes embryonic arrest at metaphase of meiosis I at high penetrance (Table I; Golden et al., 2000). When mat-3ts embryos were depleted of SPDL-1, they exited meiosis and entered the mitotic cycle with abnormal chromosome segregation, resulting in arrested embryos with multiple cells, which resembles the previously described suppression effect of the mdf-1Δ allele on the mat-3ts phenotype (Tables I and II; Stein et al., 2007). Thus, SPDL-1 depletion bypassed the meiosis I metaphase arrest of mat-3ts, possibly by decreasing the SAC activity to inhibit the APC/C.

The spdl-1 deletion allele spdl-1(ok1515) (referred to as spdl-1Δ) is a recessive lethal allele. The spdl-1Δ homozygotes that were segregated from spdl-1Δ hemizygotes survived through embryogenesis may be due to maternal contribution but showed larval lethal or sterile phenotype (unpublished data). Sterile spdl-1Δ homozygotes had oocytes that prematurely exited meiotic prophase, resulting in endomitosis (Emo phenotype; Fig. S2 A; Iwasaki et al., 1996). Oocytes having extra chromosomes were also identified (Fig. S2, B and C). Sterility was suppressed by ectopic expression of GFP–SPDL-1 (unpublished data), confirming that the germline defect was caused by loss of SPDL-1 function. mdf-1Δ homozygotes also showed an abnormal number of bivalents in oocytes and the Emo phenotype (Kitagawa and Rose, 1999). As the sterile phenotype of mdf-1Δ homozygotes is suppressed by the temperature-sensitive allele of emb-30/APC4, emb-30(tn377) (referred to as emb-30ts; Furuta et al., 2000; Kitagawa et al., 2002; Tarailo et al., 2007a), we tested whether an emb-30ts mutation suppresses the sterile phenotype of spdl-1Δ homozygotes. In contrast to spdl-1Δ homozygotes that showed sterility at high penetrance, 90% of emb-30ts; spdl-1Δ homozygotes laid eggs (Fig. S2 D). However, these embryos were arrested, suggesting that emb-30ts mutation suppressed the oocyte maturation defect but not the embryonic lethality of spdl-1Δ homozygotes. These results strongly suggest that SPDL-1 plays a role in regulating APC/C activity during oogenesis presumably via its SAC function.

Kinetochore localization of SPDL-1 depends on KNL-1 and CZW-1 but not on NDC-80 or BUB-1

Immunofluorescence microscopy using a SPDL-1–specific antibody (Fig. S2 E) revealed that SPDL-1 localized to microtubules through mitosis and to kinetochores upon nuclear envelope breakdown (NEBD) until anaphase (Fig. 1 D and Fig. S2 F). We confirmed this localization pattern in living embryos expressing GFP–SPDL-1 in the spdl-1Δ background (Video 1).

We analyzed the molecular dependency of kinetochore localization of SPDL-1 on other kinetochore proteins. RNAi-mediated depletion of KNL-1 (Desai et al., 2003), a core outer kinetochore component, or CZW-1/ZW10 (Starr et al., 1997), a component of the RZZ complex, significantly reduced the targeting of SPDL-1 on chromosomes (Fig. 2 A) without affecting localization of SPDL-1 on microtubules (Fig. S3 A) and total amount of cellular SPDL-1 in whole-worm lysate (Fig. 2 B), suggesting that both are specifically required for SPDL-1 targeting to kinetochores. However, in embryos depleted substantially of endogenous BUB-1 (Oegema et al., 2001) or NDC-80 (Fig. 2 B and Fig. S3 B), SPDL-1 remained associated with chromosomes (Fig. 2 A and Fig. S3 A).

In reciprocal experiments, we observed kinetochore localization of KNL-3 (Cheeseman et al., 2004), a component of the MIS-12 complex; KBP-4 (Cheeseman et al., 2004), a component of the NDC-80 complex; CZW-1; and BUB-1 in SPDL-1–depleted embryos in metaphase (Fig. 2 C). Depletion of KNL-1 also reduced the targeting of CZW-1 on chromosomes (unpublished data). Together, SPDL-1 is positioned downstream of CZW-1 and KNL-1 in a linear hierarchical dependency of kinetochore assembly. In contrast, localizations of SPDL-1 and BUB-1 are independent of each other, even though both proteins are required for SAC activation in C. elegans embryos.

SPDL-1 localizes and targets MDF-1 to the kinetochores that face away from the pole in embryonic cells with monopolar spindle

We next tested whether depletion of SPDL-1 affects MDF-1 localization at unattached kinetochores. MDF-1–kinetochore association was barely detectable during normal mitosis (unpublished data). In two-cell–stage embryos depleted of ZYG-1, condensed chromosomes formed an arc around the single microtubule aster nucleated from the mono centrosome (Fig. 3 A). In these cells, MDF-1 accumulated along the outer side of the chromosome arc that faces away from the centrosome (Fig. 3 A). In contrast, KNL-1 and NDC-80 localized to both the inner and outer sides of the chromosome arc (Fig. 3 A). These results suggest that sister centromeres were resolved and the outer kinetochore was assembled on both sister chromatids, but one assembled on the side facing away from the centrosomes is not captured, or only laterally captured, by microtubules. Monotelic microtubule attachment could cause the lack of tension on both sister kinetochores. Consistent with the previous finding that BUB1 and the RZZ complex localize to tension-free kinetochores (Skoufias et al., 2001; Famulski and Chan, 2007), BUB-1 and CZW-1 localized as KNL-1 and NDC-80 did (Fig. 3 A). In contrast, SPDL-1 asymmetrically localized as MDF-1 did (Fig. 3 A). Furthermore, MDF-1 associating with chromosomes was substantially reduced by depletion of SPDL-1 (Fig. 3 B and Fig. S3 C). These observations strongly suggest that SPDL-1 is specifically required for MDF-1 targeting to unattached kinetochores. Although CZW-1 localized at both sister kinetochores in ZYG-1–depleted embryos (Fig. 3 A), codepletion of CZW-1 and ZYG-1 substantially reduced localization of SPDL-1 and MDF-1 on the kinetochores facing away from the centrosome (Fig. S3 D), suggesting that SPDL-1 requires CZW-1 for its accumulation on unattached kinetochores as it does in normal mitosis. Depletion of BUB-1 did not affect kinetochore localization of SPDL-1 (Fig. 2 A and Fig. S3 A) but reduced MDF-1 on kinetochores in ZYG-1–depleted embryos (Fig. 3 B). Thus, MDF-1 localization depends on two independent molecules, SPDL-1 and BUB-1.

SPDL-1 physically associates with MDF-1

We next analyzed the physical interaction between SPDL-1 and MDF-1. There was a small but detectable amount of MDF-1 and MDF-2 in SPDL-1 immunoprecipitates from whole-worm lysate of wild-type strain (Fig. 3 C); reciprocally, SPDL-1 and MDF-2 were detected in immunoprecipitates with anti–MDF-1 antibody (Fig. 3 C). Coimmunoprecipitation of MDF-1 and SPDL-1 increased in the lysate from ZYG-1deficient worms (Fig. 3 C; O'Connell et al., 2001), suggesting that the MDF-1–MDF-2 complex associates more stably with SPDL-1 at unattached kinetochores.

In conclusion, our san-1 synthetic lethal screen identified that SPDL-1 is required for spindle defect–induced activation of the SAC. SPDL-1 localizes at the kinetochore during mitosis in a CZW-1/ZW10–dependent and BUB-1–independent manner (Fig. 3 D). In embryonic cells with the monopolar spindle, SPDL-1 localizes to kinetochores on the side of the chromosome that faces away from the mono centrosome, thereby recruiting MDF-1 via its physical association. MDF-1 localization to unattached kinetochores also depends on BUB-1. We could not show direct interaction of SPDL-1 and MDF-1 by yeast two-hybrid analysis (unpublished data), suggesting that the proteins need additional components for their interaction, or MDF-1 may be modified in a BUB-1 kinase–dependent manner for its interaction with SPDL-1.

Whether SPDL-1 is actively recruited to unattached kinetochores by interacting with other proteins or specifically excluded from attached kinetochores needs study. High amounts of SPDL-1 on metaphase chromosomes (Fig. 1 D) imply that SPDL-1 is removed from kinetochores after microtubule attachment. SPDL-1 is structurally related to Spindly, which plays a role in recruiting dynein to kinetochores and is translocated from kinetochores to microtubules in a dynein-dependent manner (Griffis et al., 2007). Therefore, dynein may remove SPDL-1 from kinetochores attached to microtubules. Although Spindly does not play the same role as SPDL-1 in MAD1 recruitment in other organisms because the property of MAD1 to localize to unattached kinetochores is highly conserved among eukaryotes (including C. elegans), other organisms might also have a similar regulatory mechanism in which other proteins may play the role of SPDL-1 in recruiting MAD1 to unattached kinetochores. Therefore, elucidating how SPDL-1 accumulates specifically at unattached kinetochores should help unravel the molecular mechanisms by which microtubule attachment status of the kinetochore is sensed to initiate SAC function.

Strains and plasmids

The following C. elegans strains were used in this study: N2 Bristol (wild-type), RB1391 san-1(ok1580) I, XA3501 unc-119(ed3) III; ruIs32[pAZ132; Ppie-1∷GFP∷his-11 unc-119(+)] III; ojIs1[Ppie-1∷GFP∷tbb-2 unc-119(+)], CB270 unc-42(e270) V, AG164 unc-42(e270) mdf-1(av19) V, RQ153 unc-46(e177) V/nT1[let-X(m435)] IV;V, KR3627 unc-46(e177) mdf-1(gk2) V/nT1[let-X(m435)] IV;V, AG170 mdf-2(tm2910) IV, AG169 mat-3(or180) III. VC1049 spdl-1(ok1515)/mln1[mls14 dpy-10(e128)] II, RQ309 spdl-1(ok1515)/mln1[mls14 dpy-10(e128)] II; emb-30(tn377ts) III, OD1 unc-119(ed3) III; itIs1[pIC22; Ppie-1∷GFP∷knl-3 unc-119(+)], OD11 unc-119(ed3) III; itIs7[pIC41; Ppie-1∷GFP∷kbp-4 unc-119(+)], DH1 zyg-1(b1) II, KR3779 fzy-1(h1983) II; unc-46(e177) mdf-1(gk2) V, RQ120 san-1(ok1580) I, RQ283 spdl-1(ok1515) II; unc-119(ed3) III; jzIs41[pRK177; Ppie-1∷GFP∷spdl-1; unc-119(+)]; itIs37[pAA64; Ppie-1∷mCherry∷his-58 unc-119(+)], RQ298 unc-119(ed3) III; jzIs48[pRK226; Ppie-1∷GFP∷czw-1 unc-119(+)], RQ244 unc-119(ed3) III; unc-46(e177) mdf-1(gk2) V; jzIs1[pRK139; Ppie-1∷GFP∷mdf-1 unc-119(+)]; itIs37[pAA64; Ppie-1∷mCherry∷his-58 unc-119(+)]. RQ120 was isolated from RB1391 after outcrossing four times. RQ283, RQ298, and RQ309 were constructed for this study. To generate transgenic strains expressing GFP–SPDL-1 or GFP–CZW-1, we constructed GFP fusions in pIC26 (Cheeseman et al., 2004). The unspliced genomic locus for spdl-1 (C06A8.5) or czw-1 (F20D12.4) was amplified by PCR from N2 genomic DNA and inserted into the pIC26 in frame. The resulting plasmid DNA was integrated into DP38 [unc-119(ed3)] using microparticle bombardment (Praitis et al., 2001) with a PDS-1000/He Biolistic Particle Delivery System (Bio-Rad Laboratories). The expression of GFP proteins in early stage embryos of RQ283 and RQ298 were analyzed by fluorescence microscopy (Videos 1 and 2). The construction of RQ244 has been described previously (Watanabe et al., 2008). KR3779 was described previously (Kitagawa et al., 2002) and provided by A. Rose (University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada). The strains carrying itIs37 (McNally et al., 2006) were provided by K. Oegema (Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA) and F.J. McNally (University of California, Davis, Davis, CA). The strains carrying mat-3(or180), mdf-2(tm2910), and mdf-1(av19) were provided by A. Golden (The National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD). All other strains were obtained from the Caenorhabditis Genetics Center.

Ahringer's C. elegans RNAi feeding library (Kamath et al., 2003) was obtained from Geneservice Ltd. dsRNA expression vectors for targeting particular genes except mdf-1 and bub-3 were isolated from the feeding library clones, retransformed, and individually cultured. For targeting mdf-1, C-terminus coding region of mdf-1 cDNA (1,130 −2,040) was cloned into pPD129.36 (Kamath et al., 2001). For targeting bub-3, the cDNA containing the 58th to 1,032nd of bub-3 coding region was cloned into pPD129.36.

RNAi screen for san-1 synthetic genetic interactors

Each RNAi bacterial clone was grown overnight at 37°C in low-salt LB (0.5% NaCl) containing 50 μg/ml ampicillin in each well of 96–deep well plates, induced with 1 mM isopropyl β-d-thiogalactoside at 37°C for 4 h. About 10 synchronized L1 larvae of wild-type or san-1Δ strain in 100 μl of complete S medium containing 50 μg/ml ampicillin and 1 mM isopropyl β-d-thiogalactoside were fed 50 μl of induced bacterial culture in each well of 96-well plates. Wells for wild-type and san-1Δ strains were placed adjacent to each other to allow easy comparison. After 5–8 d of incubation, densities of F1 worms in each well were scored by visual inspection under a microscope. Six-level scores were defined by the densities of F1 worms. If the score level of F1 density in the san-1Δ strain was reduced by more than two levels compared with the wild-type strain, the RNAi clone was considered a positive gene. Positive results were confirmed by repeating the experiments at least three times. Insert DNA sequences of positive clones were confirmed by sequencing. Some of genes positive for synthetic lethality with san-1 were further tested for synthetic genetic interaction with mdf-1 or mdf-2 as described previously (Tarailo et al., 2007b; Hajeri et al., 2008).

RNA-mediated interference

RNAi by the feeding method (Kamath et al., 2001, 2003), by the soaking method (Maeda et al., 2001), and by the microinjection method (Desai et al., 2003) was performed as described previously. For the soaking and microinjection methods, dsRNA was generated as follows: DNA fragments were amplified from the dsRNA expression vector containing a part of the coding region of the targeting gene by PCR, using T7 primer. PCR products were subjected to in vitro RNA transcription using the Megascript T7 kit (Ambion). The final concentration of dsRNA for each gene in the soaking buffer was 2 μg/μL and in the injection buffer was 1 μg/μL. Depletion level of each protein was tested as described previously (Desai et al., 2003).

Live imaging of embryos expressing GFP-fused proteins

Living embryos expressing GFP-fused proteins were dissected, mounted on an agarose pad, covered with mineral oil, and subjected to time-lapse experiments at room temperature (24°C). To follow whole mitosis in one-cell–stage embryos expressing GFP–SPDL-1 or GFP–CZW-1, an image at single focal planes was taken every 30 s. To follow mitosis in one- or two-cell–stage embryos expressing GFP fusion proteins, a set of images at three focal planes at 2-μm intervals was taken at each time point. To analyze centrosome separation, a set of images at five focal planes at 2-μm intervals was taken every 10 s. Images were projected and the distance between centrosomes was measured using Openlab (Improvision).

Live images were taken by a motorized fluorescence microscope (DM IRE2; Leica) equipped with a Plan Apo 63× lens (NA 1.4; Leica) with 1.5× magnification and an ORCA-ER high-resolution digital CCD camera (Hamamatsu Photonics) binning 2× under control of Openlab. Image deconvolution was performed by Volocity (Improvision).

Induction of SAC-dependent mitotic delay by RNAi-mediated depletion of ZYG-1

SAC-dependent mitotic delay was induced by RNAi-mediated depletion of ZYG-1, a protein required for daughter centriole formation (O'Connell et al., 2001), which results in monopolar spindle formation in the second embryonic division. Consequently, sister kinetochores capture only the mono-oriented microtubule attachment, causing SAC-dependent mitotic delay. Embryos expressing GFP–histone H2B and GFP–tubulin were dissected from adult hermaphrodites injected with zyg-1 dsRNA only or a mixture of dsRNAs of zyg-1 and other genes, and subjected to time-lapse differential interference contrast and fluorescent microscopy. The duration of mitosis was defined as an interval between NEBD and chromosome decondensation. Under our experimental conditions, the duration of mitosis of ZYG-1–depleted cells was extended to 600 s, the duration of normal mitosis being 200 s (Fig. 1 A).

Phenotypic analysis of the spdl-1 deletion strain

Chromosome morphology of germ cells in hermaphrodite gonads of wild-type or spdl-1(ok1515) homozygotes were analyzed as described previously. (Kitagawa and Rose, 1999). To analyze the fertility of the strains, more than twenty wild-type–looking L4 larvae segregated from VC1049 [spdl-1(ok1515)/mln1] or RQ309 [spdl-1(ok1515)/mln1; emb-30(tn377ts)] were isolated individually and incubated at 20°C for 12 h, and then the presence of eggs was checked. The homozygosity of spdl-1(ok1515) in fertile worms was confirmed by PCR.

Antibody preparation

For generation of rabbit anti–SPDL-1 antibody and anti–CZW-1 antibody, a full-length cDNA of spdl-1 and a cDNA containing the 1,090th to 2,334th of czw-1 coding region were cloned into pRSETA (Invitrogen). Each purified 6-histidine–tagged recombinant proteins was used to immunize two rabbits. The antiserum generation was performed by Covance ImmunoTechnologies laboratory. For affinity purification, full-length spdl-1 cDNA and a cDNA containing the 1,090th to 2,334th of czw-1 coding region were cloned into pGEX4T1 (GE Healthcare), and purified GST–SPDL-1 or GST–CZW-1 was coupled to an AminoLink column (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Rabbit immunosera were affinity purified on the AminoLink column with coupled GST-fused proteins.

Immunofluorescence microscopic analysis

For immunostaining of proteins except SPDL-1 or CZW-1, embryos dissected or isolated by the alkaline hypochlorite method (Lewis and Fleming, 1995) were transferred onto poly-l-lysine–coated slides, frozen on dry ice, cracked, fixed with −20°C methanol for 10 min, dehydrated with −20°C acetone for 10 min, and rehydrated with PBS, pH 8.0, for 10 min. For SPDL-1 or CZW-1 staining, embryos prepared by the alkaline hypochlorite method were collected in a tube, fixed with −20°C methanol for 10 min, and washed with PBS. Embryos were then blocked with blocking solution (10% skimmed milk in PBS) for 1 h; incubated overnight at 4°C with blocking solution containing rat anti–α-tubulin YL1/2 (1:100; AbD Serotec) and anti–SPDL-1 (1:200), anti–KNL-1 (1 μg/ml; Desai et al., 2003), anti–NDC-80 (1 μg/ml; Desai et al., 2003), anti–BUB-1 (1 μg/ml; Oegema et al., 2001), anti–MDF-1 (1:2,000; Watanabe et al., 2008), or anti–CZW-1 antibodies (1:200); washed with PBST (0.1% Tween-20 in PBS); incubated for 3 h with blocking solution containing Alexa 594–conjugated anti–rabbit IgG (1:2,000; Invitrogen), Alexa 488–conjugated anti–rat IgG (1:2,000; Invitrogen), and 3 μg/ml DAPI; washed with PBST; and mounted on slides. For costaining of SPDL-1 and other kinetochore proteins, embryos were isolated by the alkaline hypochlorite method, fixed with 3% formaldehyde for 30 min, postfixed with −20°C methanol for 5 min, washed with PBST, and then subjected to immunostaining. The anti–SPDL-1 antibody was labeled with DyLight488 or 594 (Thermo Fisher Scientific), and used along with the anti–BUB-1 antibody labeled with Cy3 or the anti–-CZW-1 antibody labeled with DyLight488, respectively. For costaining of SPDL-1 and KNL-1, the specimen was first stained with anti–KNL-1 antibody and Alexa 488–conjugated anti–rabbit IgG (Invitrogen), and then stained with anti–SPDL-1 labeled with DyLight594. Images were taken by the same microscope system as described in a previous section (Live imaging of embryos expressing GFP-fused proteins) except for a Plan Apo 100× lens (NA 1.4; Leica) without auxiliary magnification and binning (1×). Optical section images were collected at focus intervals of 0.5 μm. Antibodies for KNL-1, NDC-80, and BUB-1 were provided by A. Desai (Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA).

Immunoprecipitation/Western blotting analysis

zyg-1(b1) temperature-sensitive strain (O'Connell et al., 2001) was maintained at 16°C and incubated at 25°C for 12 h before protein lysate preparation. Protein lysate from gravid worms was prepared in RIPA buffer (50 mM Tris-Cl, pH 8.0, 200 mM NaCl, 1% NP-40, 0.5% deoxycholic acid, and 0.1% SDS) and immunoprecipitation was performed as described previously (Watanabe et al., 2008). For Western blot analysis, the following primary antibodies were used: anti–MDF-1 (1:20,000; Watanabe et al., 2008), anti–SPDL-1 (1:2,500), and anti–MDF-2 (1:1,000; Kitagawa and Rose, 1999).

Online supplemental material

Fig. S1 shows genetic and cell biological characterization of the physiological function of spdl-1. Fig. S2 shows fluorescence microscopic analysis of molecular dependency of SPDL-1 on other kinetochore-associating proteins for its kinetochore localization. Fig. S3 shows fluorescence microscopic analysis of molecular dependency of MDF-1 and other kinetochore-associating proteins for its kinetochore localization. Video 1 shows the time-lapse imaging analysis of the one-cell–stage embryo expressing GFP–SPDL-1 in spdl-1Δ background. Video 2 shows the time-lapse imaging analysis of the one-cell–stage embryo expressing GFP–CZW-1.

© 2008 Yamamoto et al. This article is distributed under the terms of an Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike–No Mirror Sites license for the first six months after the publication date (see http://www.jcb.org/misc/terms.shtml). After six months it is available under a Creative Commons License (Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike 3.0 Unported license, as described at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/).

Abbreviations used in this paper: APC/C, anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome; dsRNA, double-stranded RNA; NEBD, nuclear envelope breakdown; RZZ, ROD–ZW10–ZWILCH; SAC, spindle assembly checkpoint.

We thank the Caenorhabditis Genetics Center; Arshad Desai for providing antibodies and useful discussion; Andy Golden and David Greenstein for critically reading the manuscript; and Elaine Law, Christen N. Gregory, Brynne Hancock, and Leslie Douglas for technical assistance.

This work was supported by the Cancer Center Support grant CA021765 from the National Cancer Institute and by the American Lebanese Syrian Associated Charities. A. Essex was supported by the University of California, San Diego, Genetics Training grant.

Cheeseman, I.M., and A. Desai.
2008
. Molecular architecture of the kinetochore-microtubule interface.
Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol.
9
:
33
–46.
Cheeseman, I.M., S. Niessen, S. Anderson, F. Hyndman, J.R. Yates III, K. Oegema, and A. Desai.
2004
. A conserved protein network controls assembly of the outer kinetochore and its ability to sustain tension.
Genes Dev.
18
:
2255
–2268.
De Antoni, A., C.G. Pearson, D. Cimini, J.C. Canman, V. Sala, L. Nezi, M. Mapelli, L. Sironi, M. Faretta, E.D. Salmon, and A. Musacchio.
2005
. The Mad1/Mad2 complex as a template for Mad2 activation in the spindle assembly checkpoint.
Curr. Biol.
15
:
214
–225.
Desai, A., S. Rybina, T. Muller-Reichert, A. Shevchenko, A. Shevchenko, A. Hyman, and K. Oegema.
2003
. KNL-1 directs assembly of the microtubule-binding interface of the kinetochore in C. elegans.
Genes Dev.
17
:
2421
–2435.
Encalada, S.E., J. Willis, R. Lyczak, and B. Bowerman.
2005
. A spindle checkpoint functions during mitosis in the early Caenorhabditis elegans embryo.
Mol. Biol. Cell.
16
:
1056
–1070.
Famulski, J.K., and G.K. Chan.
2007
. Aurora B kinase-dependent recruitment of hZW10 and hROD to tensionless kinetochores.
Curr. Biol.
17
:
2143
–2149.
Furuta, T., S. Tuck, J. Kirchner, B. Koch, R. Auty, R. Kitagawa, A.M. Rose, and D. Greenstein.
2000
. EMB-30: an APC4 homologue required for metaphase-to-anaphase transitions during meiosis and mitosis in Caenorhabditis elegans.
Mol. Biol. Cell.
11
:
1401
–1419.
Golden, A., P.L. Sadler, M.R. Wallenfang, J.M. Schumacher, D.R. Hamill, G. Bates, B. Bowerman, G. Seydoux, and D.C. Shakes.
2000
. Metaphase to anaphase (mat) transition–defective mutants in Caenorhabditis elegans.
J. Cell Biol.
151
:
1469
–1482.
Griffis, E.R., N. Stuurman, and R.D. Vale.
2007
. Spindly, a novel protein essential for silencing the spindle assembly checkpoint, recruits dynein to the kinetochore.
J. Cell Biol.
177
:
1005
–1015.
Hajeri, V.A., A.M. Stewart, L.L. Moore, and P.A. Padilla.
2008
. Genetic analysis of the spindle checkpoint genes san-1, mdf-2, bub-3 and the CENP-F homologues hcp-1 and hcp-2 in Caenorhabditis elegans.
Cell Div.
3
:
6
.
Hoyt, M.A., L. Totis, and B.T. Roberts.
1991
. S. cerevisiae genes required for cell cycle arrest in response to loss of microtubule function.
Cell.
66
:
507
–517.
Iwasaki, K., J. McCarter, R. Francis, and T. Schedl.
1996
. emo-1, a Caenorhabditis elegans Sec61p γ homologue, is required for oocyte development and ovulation.
J. Cell Biol.
134
:
699
–714.
Kamath, R.S., M. Martinez-Campos, P. Zipperlen, A.G. Fraser, and J. Ahringer.
2001
. Effectiveness of specific RNA-mediated interference through ingested double-stranded RNA in Caenorhabditis elegans.
Genome Biol.
2
:
RESEARCH0002
.
Kamath, R.S., A.G. Fraser, Y. Dong, G. Poulin, R. Durbin, M. Gotta, A. Kanapin, N. Le Bot, S. Moreno, M. Sohrmann, et al.
2003
. Systematic functional analysis of the Caenorhabditis elegans genome using RNAi.
Nature.
421
:
231
–237.
Karess, R.
2005
. Rod-Zw10-Zwilch: a key player in the spindle checkpoint.
Trends Cell Biol.
15
:
386
–392.
Kitagawa, R., and A.M. Rose.
1999
. Components of the spindle-assembly checkpoint are essential in Caenorhabditis elegans.
Nat. Cell Biol.
1
:
514
–521.
Kitagawa, R., E. Law, L. Tang, and A.M. Rose.
2002
. The Cdc20 homolog, FZY-1, and its interacting protein, IFY-1, are required for proper chromosome segregation in Caenorhabditis elegans.
Curr. Biol.
12
:
2118
–2123.
Kops, G.J., Y. Kim, B.A. Weaver, Y. Mao, I. McLeod, J.R. Yates III, M. Tagaya, and D.W. Cleveland.
2005
. ZW10 links mitotic checkpoint signaling to the structural kinetochore.
J. Cell Biol.
169
:
49
–60.
Lewis, J.A., and J.T. Fleming.
1995
. Basic culture methods.
Methods Cell Biol.
48
:
3
–29.
Li, R., and A.W. Murray.
1991
. Feedback control of mitosis in budding yeast.
Cell.
66
:
519
–531.
Maeda, I., Y. Kohara, M. Yamamoto, and A. Sugimoto.
2001
. Large-scale analysis of gene function in Caenorhabditis elegans by high-throughput RNAi.
Curr. Biol.
11
:
171
–176.
May, K.M., and K.G. Hardwick.
2006
. The spindle checkpoint.
J. Cell Sci.
119
:
4139
–4142.
McNally, K., A. Audhya, K. Oegema, and F.J. McNally.
2006
. Katanin controls mitotic and meiotic spindle length.
J. Cell Biol.
175
:
881
–891.
Musacchio, A., and E.D. Salmon.
2007
. The spindle-assembly checkpoint in space and time.
Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol.
8
:
379
–393.
Nystul, T.G., J.P. Goldmark, P.A. Padilla, and M.B. Roth.
2003
. Suspended animation in C. elegans requires the spindle checkpoint.
Science.
302
:
1038
–1041.
O'Connell, K.F., C. Caron, K.R. Kopish, D.D. Hurd, K.J. Kemphues, Y. Li, and J.G. White.
2001
. The C. elegans zyg-1 gene encodes a regulator of centrosome duplication with distinct maternal and paternal roles in the embryo.
Cell.
105
:
547
–558.
Oegema, K., A. Desai, S. Rybina, M. Kirkham, and A.A. Hyman.
2001
. Functional analysis of kinetochore assembly in Caenorhabditis elegans.
J. Cell Biol.
153
:
1209
–1226.
Praitis, V., E. Casey, D. Collar, and J. Austin.
2001
. Creation of low-copy integrated transgenic lines in Caenorhabditis elegans.
Genetics.
157
:
1217
–1226.
Sironi, L., M. Melixetian, M. Faretta, E. Prosperini, K. Helin, and A. Musacchio.
2001
. Mad2 binding to Mad1 and Cdc20, rather than oligomerization, is required for the spindle checkpoint.
EMBO J.
20
:
6371
–6382.
Skoufias, D.A., P.R. Andreassen, F.B. Lacroix, L. Wilson, and R.L. Margolis.
2001
. Mammalian mad2 and bub1/bubR1 recognize distinct spindle-attachment and kinetochore-tension checkpoints.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA.
98
:
4492
–4497.
Sonnichsen, B., L.B. Koski, A. Walsh, P. Marschall, B. Neumann, M. Brehm, A.M. Alleaume, J. Artelt, P. Bettencourt, E. Cassin, et al.
2005
. Full-genome RNAi profiling of early embryogenesis in Caenorhabditis elegans.
Nature.
434
:
462
–469.
Starr, D.A., B.C. Williams, Z. Li, B. Etemad-Moghadam, R.K. Dawe, and M.L. Goldberg.
1997
. Conservation of the centromere/kinetochore protein ZW10.
J. Cell Biol.
138
:
1289
–1301.
Starr, D.A., B.C. Williams, T.S. Hays, and M.L. Goldberg.
1998
. ZW10 helps recruit dynactin and dynein to the kinetochore.
J. Cell Biol.
142
:
763
–774.
Stein, K.K., E.S. Davis, T. Hays, and A. Golden.
2007
. Components of the spindle assembly checkpoint regulate the anaphase-promoting complex during meiosis in Caenorhabditis elegans.
Genetics.
175
:
107
–123.
Tarailo, M., R. Kitagawa, and A.M. Rose.
2007
a. Suppressors of spindle checkpoint defect (such) mutants identify new mdf-1/MAD1 interactors in Caenorhabditis elegans.
Genetics.
175
:
1665
–1679.
Tarailo, M., S. Tarailo, and A.M. Rose.
2007
b. Synthetic lethal interactions identify phenotypic “interologs” of the spindle assembly checkpoint components.
Genetics.
177
:
2525
–2530.
Watanabe, S., T.G. Yamamoto, and R. Kitagawa.
2008
. Spindle assembly checkpoint gene mdf-1 regulates germ cell proliferation in response to nutrition signals in C. elegans.
EMBO J.
27
:
1085
–1096.

Supplementary data