Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Newest Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Archive
    • Subject Collections
    • Special Collections
  • Reviews & Opinions
    • Editorials
    • People & Ideas
    • Spotlights
    • Viewpoints
    • Inside Look
    • Reviews
    • biosights podcast
  • Alerts
  • About
    • History
    • Editors & Staff
    • Journal Metrics
    • Permissions & Licensing
    • Advertise
    • Contact Us
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Publication Fees
    • Author Services
  • Subscriptions
  • Rockefeller University Press
  • JCB
  • JEM
  • JGP
  • LSA

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
JCB
  • Rockefeller University Press
  • JCB
  • JEM
  • JGP
  • LSA
  • Log in
JCB

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Newest Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Archive
    • Subject Collections
    • Special Collections
  • Reviews & Opinions
    • Editorials
    • People & Ideas
    • Spotlights
    • Viewpoints
    • Inside Look
    • Reviews
    • biosights podcast
  • Alerts
  • About
    • History
    • Editors & Staff
    • Journal Metrics
    • Permissions & Licensing
    • Advertise
    • Contact Us
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Publication Fees
    • Author Services
  • Subscriptions

You are here

jcb Home » 2017 Archive » 4 December » 216 (12): 3949
Report

Chromosome biorientation and APC activity remain uncoupled in oocytes with reduced volume

View ORCID ProfileSimon I.R. Lane  Correspondence email, View ORCID ProfileKeith T. Jones
Simon I.R. Lane
Biological Sciences, Faculty of Natural and Environmental Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UKSchool of Biomedical Sciences and Pharmacy, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Simon I.R. Lane
  • For correspondence: simon.lane@soton.ac.uk
Keith T. Jones
Biological Sciences, Faculty of Natural and Environmental Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UKSchool of Biomedical Sciences and Pharmacy, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Keith T. Jones
DOI: 10.1083/jcb.201606134 | Published October 4, 2017
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info
  • Metrics
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Data supplements

  • Files in this Data Supplement:

    • Supplemental Materials (PDF)
    • Video 1 -
      Nonaligned bivalents do not prevent anaphase in B3 oocytes. B3 oocytes expressing H2B-mCherry (red) and CenpC-GFP (green) with time shown (h:min) relative to anaphase onset. Bar, 10 µm. Inset shows the bright-field image of the same oocyte at low magnification, with H2B-mCherry in red.
    • Video 2 -
      Nocodazole-induced nonaligned bivalents do not prevent anaphase in B3 oocytes. B3 oocytes expressing H2B-mCherry (red) and CenpC-GFP (green) with time shown (h:min) relative to anaphase onset. Bar, 10 µm. Nocodazole present throughout at 25 nM. Inset shows the bright-field image of the same oocyte at low magnification, with H2B-mCherry in red.

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Repeated oocyte bisection produces small oocytes that undergo MI. (A) Schematic of the triple bisection procedure showing the generation of B0, B1, B2, and B3 oocytes. The same colors are adopted for all figures throughout. (B) Oocyte volumes expressed in pL (left axis) or as a percentage of full size oocytes (right axis). Dashed horizontal lines show the expected sizes of half, quarter, and eighth oocytes. (C) Oocyte radii after bisection. (D) Representative images of oocytes expressing tubulin-GFP and H2B-mCherry, with cartoon depiction underneath. Bar, 50 µm. (E) Percentage of oocytes completing MI; n.s. not significant. Error bars indicate 95% confidence interval. In B, C, and E, numbers of oocytes used are indicated in parentheses. In B and C, groups without common letters indicate significant differences (analysis of variance with Tukey’s correction for multiple comparisons; P < 0.0001).

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    Smaller oocytes spend longer in prometaphase but then have a faster rate of securin loss. (A) Relative securin degradation traces from B3 cytoplasts lacking chromosomes after bisection. (B) Representative time lapse of B0 (top) and B3 (bottom) oocytes expressing securin-YFP and H2B-mCherry relative to time after NEB. Bar, 10 µm. (C) Timing of anaphase relative to NEB, determined from images as in B. There is no significant difference in the time of anaphase between B0 and B3 oocytes. (D) Timing of NEB (left) and anaphase (right) relative to activation of the APC. Plots for individual oocytes are displayed above, with means below. (E) Individual (pale) and mean (bold) securin traces from B0 and B3 oocytes, arranged relative to the time of APC activation. Horizontal bars show the corresponding timing of anaphase. (F) Maximal rate of securin destruction recorded from traces as in E. In C, D, and F, numbers of oocytes used are indicated in parentheses. In C, D, and F, statistical test was unpaired t test. Error bars indicate SD.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    Non-bioriented bivalents do not prevent APC activation in smaller oocytes. (A) Representative time-lapse images of B0 and B3 oocytes expressing H2B-mCherry (green) and CenpC-GFP (red) with time relative to anaphase. Arrowheads indicate non-bioriented bivalents in both types of oocyte. Bar, 10 µm. (B) Cartoon depicting measurements of stretch, displacement and θ on a bivalent with sister kinetochore pairs (red). (C) Number of bivalents per oocyte classed as non-bioriented (>3 SDs from the control mean in any of the parameters of stretch, displacement, or θ) at times relative to anaphase; n.s. not significant. (D) 3D plot of bivalents in B3 oocytes 5 min before anaphase, indicating the spread of stretch, displacement, and θ. Colors indicate the number of SDs a bivalent is, according to its worst-performing measure, from mean values defined by metaphase oocytes treated without nocodazole (green <1, yellow ≤2, orange ≤3, and red >3). (E and F) Proportion of bivalents falling within the stated number of SDs at anaphase −5 min for B0 (E) and B3 (F) oocytes. Error bars indicate SD.

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    Several non-bioriented bivalents fail to prevent APC activation in small oocytes. (A) Percentage of B0 and B3 oocytes extruding polar bodies with or without addition of 25 nM nocodazole to the culture medium. Statistical test was Fisher’s exact. Error bars indicate 95% confidence interval. (B) Representative time-lapse images of oocytes expressing H2B-mCherry and CenpC-GFP with time relative to anaphase. Bar, 10 µm. (C) Number of bivalents per oocyte classed as non-bioriented (>3 SDs from the control mean in any of the parameters of stretch, displacement, or θ) at times relative to anaphase. Statistical test is Dunn’s multiple comparison test; n.s. not significant; *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01. (D) 3D scatterplot of bivalents 5 min before anaphase in B3 oocytes cultured in 25 nM nocodazole. Colors indicate the number of SDs a bivalent is, according to its worst-performing measure, from mean values defined by metaphase oocytes treated without nocodazole (green <1, yellow ≤2, orange ≤3, and red >3). (E) Proportion of bivalents for B0 oocytes falling within the stated number of SDs at anaphase −5 min.

  • Figure 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 5.

    Matched doses of nocodazole reveal differences in APC activity with reduced oocyte volume. (A) B0 oocytes were matured in the indicated concentrations of nocodazole and assessed for bivalent biorientation 6 h after NEB. Colors indicate the number of SDs a bivalent is, according to its worst-performing measure, from mean values defined by metaphase oocytes treated without nocodazole (green <1, yellow ≤2, orange ≤3, and red >3). (B and C) 3D scatterplots showing the extent of chromosome biorientation in B3 oocytes (25 nM nocodazole; B) and B0 oocytes (35 nM nocodazole; C) as in A. (D) Percentage of oocytes of the indicated size extruding polar bodies after 15-h culture in the indicated concentration of nocodazole. (E) Duration of MI, defined as the time from NEB to anaphase. (F) Individual (pale) and mean (bold) securin traces from B0 and B3 oocytes, arranged relative to the time of APC activation. Horizontal bars show the corresponding timing of anaphase. (G) Representative traces of two modes of securin degradation found in B3 oocytes matured in 25 nM nocodazole. Arrowheads indicate the timing of anaphase. Red color indicates periods of stalling. (H) Proportion of MI-arrested oocytes that exhibited stalling. (I) Proportion of oocytes that completed MI that exhibited stalling. (J) Results from experiments with and without nocodazole addition are presented together for comparison of the effects of oocyte volume reduction and addition of matched doses of nocodazole. Blue points, B3 oocytes; red, B0; round points, no stalling event was detected; square points, stalling. Back border indicates the presence of nocodazole (25 nM for B3 and 35 nM for B0). Parentheses indicate number of oocytes. Error bars are SDs. Gray dashed lines indicate points where the duration of MI (prometaphase + metaphase) is the same. Statistical comparisons between all points are indicated in Fig. S3. In A, D, E, and G–I, numbers of oocytes are indicated in parenthesis. Statistical tests used were Fisher’s exact test (D, H, and I) and unpaired t test (E).

Previous articleNext article
Back to top
Download PDF
PDF + Supp Data
Citation Tools
Chromosome biorientation and APC activity remain uncoupled in oocytes with reduced volume
Simon I.R. Lane, Keith T. Jones
The Journal of Cell Biology Dec 2017, 216 (12) 3949-3957; DOI: 10.1083/jcb.201606134

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address

Email logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo Reddit logo CiteULike logo LinkedIn logo
The Journal of Cell Biology: 218 (12)

Current Issue

December 2, 2019
Volume 218, No. 12

  • Table of Contents
  • All Issues

Jump To

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Results and discussion
    • Materials and methods
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info
  • Metrics
  • Preview PDF
 

Subjects

  • DNA Biology
  • Development
  • Cell Cycle and Division

ARTICLES

  • Current Issue
  • Newest Articles
  • Archive
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds

FOR AUTHORS

  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Instructions for Authors

ABOUT

  • About JCB
  • Editors & Staff
  • Permissions & Licensing
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Feedback
  • Newsroom
  • Privacy Policy

CONNECT WITH JCB

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • RSS
  • Instagram

Online ISSN: 1540-8140
Print ISSN: 0021-9525

Copyright © 2019 JCB by Rockefeller University Press